BENJAMIN APPL: BARITONE, TO SING SCHUBERT’S DIE SCHÖNE MÜLLERIN JULY 11 AT TORONTO SUMMER MUSIC FESTIVAL, RECALLS “IN THE LAST FEW YEARS, I STAYED MAYBE 20-30 DAYS A YEAR AT MY HOME, IN MY OWN BED. I LIVE OUT OF A SUITCASE, A LIFE WHICH I COULD HAVE NEVER IMAGINED WHEN I WAS IN BANKING.” …. A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS 

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us what you want the public to know about your work in the arts. For instance, how do you yourself describe it as a significant experience in your life and why exactly do you labour to make it exist?

BA: On a different life path, I grew up in a family which was musical, my mother played the guitar, we sang a lot, and then I was a chorister. Afterwards, I wasn’t sure if I should become a singer. Therefore, I worked in a bank and studied business before moving to London in 2010. Music has always been an important part of my life, a love, and it hasn’t been always my profession. And it was just wonderful to experience how music shaped my entire life and became more and more significant. That’s something I love with the arts, or with music generally, and it can happen whether you become a professional musician or not. But music is something that doesn’t let you go. And this is a significant experience for me, and a realization which makes my daily life better. Listening to music or making music when I feel ill or sick, it just transforms me as a human being, it makes me happier. And that’s for me really something which is so significant and makes my existence better, my life better. And it’s the most wonderful thing I think that art, music, can do and does with me personally.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create, as originator or as interpreter, or as both if such is the case?

BA: Well, I’m not an originator, I’m an interpreter, and it’s interesting to be a medium for people of music of the 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th and 21st century I perform. Like a painter, I paint every night, the song in a different way. When you think of a painting of Venice, for example, there exist many. Every painter paints the scene a different colour, paints the sky in a different colour. And we, every day, depending on our experiences we had throughout the day, shape it differently, and that’s what I like, it’s not in stone what we do. Every day we have a chance to create it in a different way, with the same piece of music, with the same text. And that I find very fulfilling.

JS: Please give us a brief autobiography, some stuff about yourself that is relevant to the essence of your work in the arts.

BA: As I said before, coming from a chorister, studying business, working in a bank, becoming a musician, this is not a straight way forward but it is essential to who I am today. I started later than anyone else with singing, which I am now grateful for it. I think very often that particularly male singers start too early. You need certain experience in life, not just vocal maturity, but also intellectually. It’s a tough job, you have to be prepared, and that’s something why I’m very happy about it. And that I had this loop, that I really experienced something else, but made the step that music had to be the centre of my life.

JS: In what ways is your creative work fairly easy to do and in what ways is it difficult to realize? Why is it so?

BA: I think there’s not so much fairly easy with our job, apart from after finding a personal connection with the music and how to present it and communicate it with people. If you’re yourself and you try to find a good emotional connection and the way how to communicate it, then it can be fairly easy. Generally, it’s quite a difficult job. We carry our instrument 24 hours inside of us, and we can’t, like a pianist, leave the instrument at home for two hours in the evening and go to the pub. And that’s something we have to live with regarding our instrument, we have to accept it when it’s not working one day, we have to be kind to it. And that is quite a difficult thing to reflect and think about, but not become too self-centered and think only about ourselves – yes, that’s something very challenging and we have to cope with it.

JS: How does doing the kind of work you do in the arts change you as a person – and as a creator?

BA: It changes us very much. Again, in this reflecting process, we have to be open, we have to find inspiration and that’s something, of course, that has a huge influence on ourselves. We change our daily routine, we have to be careful with our voice, we can’t have the wildest life before performances, and so on. And the curiosity as an artist that we have to have influences us very much. The way of reflecting about ourselves, that we try to become better and better, is also something which changes us. I think, of course, the art and the voice are so dominant in our life, and really leading our lives, that we have to follow the music and the voice as a person with our life.

JS: What kind of audience does your work in the arts interest? What new audience are you also seeking? Why to both questions?

BA: The field of Art Song is a bubble within the classical music world, which is a bubble in itself. So, I am very much aware that we will never have huge audiences or huge crowds and millions of people listening to us, but that is also fine to accept. I think that, generally, elderly people who have more time in their lives, who don’t have to worry about small kids, or making a lot of money in their jobs, or have to learn a lot in schools, and so on, they have more the luxury of time. And when you do some recitals, you have to focus fully on the music and the text. It’s not something which you can listen to on playlists next to a fancy dinner. It really requires full attention. And that’s challenging in the 21st century in a very “short living” time when everything’s very hectic. So that’s a reason why I think particularly people listening to song cycles are very often are in the second half of their lives.

I’m trying with my own program to go into schools and bring this Art Song into schools and make kids curious about this music. It’s very important to plant the love I feel for this music into the hearts or into the ears of these young people so that at least they have the first encounter and see that people are passionate about it.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work in the arts?

BA: It’s the emotional impact, we connect to these songs. In song recitals, you don’t have a stage director telling you what to do, it’s all your own work, it’s your own life experiences you put emotionally into these songs and communicate with an audience. So, of course, these are big parts of ourselves, we reveal our inner life on stage. On top of that it’s personal programs that you put together, concept albums about your life, about your life experiences. It’s a very personal signature on recorded albums and, for example, I created one about home and about belonging. Also with program notes, with contemporary compositions, working together with the composer, choosing the text. So, we shape the music history of our time within the centuries of music history through our commissions, through the work we sing. I think that’s very important that we never forget that we are a part of music history which is still going on and will go on in the future.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person in the arts?

BA: Finding inspiration. We give so much on stage and every evening try to give what we can that we actually have to fulfil our inner inspirations – go to museums, watch in the underground how people walk, and think ‘This is a character in this song.’ Having a wonderful time with other inspiring people, listening to their stories, being curious, having every pore of your body open so we find inspiration again for a new way of interpreting songs. Asking questions why we do it this way, this tempo, why do we take time here, why is this word important for us. So that we actually create and never just deliver.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that brought you to this point as a creative person in the arts.

BA: I think it was really coming to London in 2010 from a small place in Bavaria and finding inspiration in all these museums, musical theatre, plays. All of that really shaped me as an artist, and the friends I found here. That was really a turning point where I was also certain I would become a musician for sure and not go back to banking.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

BA: I think it’s the life living out of a suitcase. In the last few years, I stayed maybe 20-30 days a year at my home, in my own bed. I spend most of the time on the road or in hotels, a life which I could have never imagined when I was in banking. I had a very easy life living with my girlfriend, together cooking every evening, watching TV. It’s a completely different setup now, which is hard, but has also on the other hand wonderful experiences, and you meet very interesting people. But from outside, I think, it’s such a strange life and people struggle to imagine living it.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted as yet that you would like to do in the arts.

BA: There’s so many ideas, interesting places to perform. I would love to perform song recitals for example like Schubert’s “Winter Journey” in the Arctic. Pushing boundaries with other art forms, collaborations. I have so many ideas in my mind that it’s overwhelming, I have to write them down. First of all, not to forget them, but also to focus my mind on one idea. So, it’s still a source of many ideas coming out. I would just love to go in different directions, work with different people.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

BA: There is nothing major I would like to change. Of course, there are small decisions which maybe were wrong or should have been done differently, but there is really nothing major I would do differently.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s culture, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

BA: I think it’s wonderful that there are so many young people interested in studying singing or classical music. In colleges there are so many applications, like never before, so that’s something very positive. I find the lack of interest in politics and people in arts quite worrying. There are so many studies around the world which show the impact of music on human brains, on kids, how it makes them better human beings with better social skills, but also they learn other subjects faster, like languages, and so on. There is only good, and I find it strange that no politicians really see the huge impact and how important it is. We have to plant music and art into the brains and hearts of young people. And even if they don’t like it in the beginning, I think it’s important that they have the chance to encounter it so that when they get older and listen to classical music they feel familiar with it. If they don’t get the chance from the very beginning, it’s very hard later on to really understand this world which is so important in shaping for everyone. That’s something I feel very passionate about.

JS: What exactly has the impact of the COVID pandemic been on your creative work and your life in the arts?

BA: I have to say that before COVID I was travelling around massively and it was somehow also very healthy having this reset. Before that there was always this part of being annoyed by small, unimportant things like hotel breakfasts and sitting at an airport waiting for an airplane. And having this massive break where everything stands still, when you have a chance again to look into music, to create, to ask big questions like why do you do this job, or if there is something else you should do? I see it looking back as a gift somehow, to have this objective perspective, one step back, and look at your life and overlook everything. And therefore it changes a lot as I had time to look into new repertoire, to think of new collaborations, to talk to people about ideas, and therefore every one of us had the chance in this past two and a half years to make the best of it, to use this time wisely, and to actually take your life again into your own hands and see what you’ll do with it, and therefore I’m grateful.

JS: How has the pandemic changed you as a person?

BA: I think it changed me as a person to not take things for granted, to be grateful for the opportunities, for the relationships, for the private lives, for moments of calmness, for not accepting everything immediately and really stand up if things are not the way you think they should be.

JS: What’s next in the coming few years of your life in the arts?

BA: It’s definitely exploring new directions, new collaborations, working with dancers, with painters, with visual artists. Just probing the horizon, being curious, not thinking in boxes but outside my box, and appreciating other people and their work and their love.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SHEILA MURRAY: AUTHOR OF NEW NOVEL “FINDING EDWARD” (CORMORANT BOOKS) EXPLAINS “THE BOOK ASKS, “WHY IS WHITE CANADIAN HISTORY WRITTEN, AND CELEBRATED, WHEN WHAT BLACKS HAVE ACCOMPLISHED IS DISMISSED, OR HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW?” ……: A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us what you want the public to know about your new book. For instance, what exactly is it and why does it exist?

SHEILA MURRAY: Finding Edward is a book about two mixed-race men, one born in the 1920s, the other in 1990s. Cyril, the novel’s central character, was born in Jamaica. His coming of age is guided by his search for the story of the much older man who was born in Toronto. Edward’s history and his resilience become an inspiration for the younger man who is struggling to grasp his own potential.

At the same time, the book asks, “Why is white Canadian history written, and celebrated, when what Blacks have accomplished is dismissed, or hidden from public view? The Tulsa race massacre in the USA took place in 1921, around the same time that my character, Edward, was born. That massacre of Black American professionals, and the destruction of their achievements, was hidden for decades.

JS: Please give us a brief autobiography, some stuff about yourself that is relevant to this book.

SM: My mother was English and white, my father was Black Jamaican, and I was born and raised in England. My starting point with the book was to explore what it is to be mixed race, and the tensions that affect those of us who are racialized by the cultures we’re raised in. We should be able to claim our place as equally rooted in both colours, but that’s impossible in today’s world. We don’t get to choose our ‘racial’ identity. If we are darker skinned, rather than lighter, then Canadian and American cultures identify us as ’Black.’ I identify as Black when there is not an optional mixed-race box to check. Racialized people experience a litany of disadvantages in Canada and the USA. An obvious response to all of this, is that everyone should be treated equally— but this is patently not the case.

JS: In what ways was this book fairly easy to do and in what ways was it difficult to realize? How long did it take and why that long?

SM: If I were to start writing the novel today, it would be a different story, at least for Cyril. I started writing Finding Edward in 2012. Since then, a new race-consciousness has surfaced in mainstream culture. My book’s central character, Cyril, arrived in what Canada considered its ‘multicultural’ heyday — before Black Lives Matter fiercely challenged the status quo, and prevailed. Trayvon Martin was murdered in Florida in 2012 and his killer acquitted in 2014. Michael Eligon was shot by Toronto police in 2012, and his killer cleared of responsibility a month later. By 2016, Black Lives Matters was established in Canada. In 2017, Colin Kaepernick knelt for the American national anthem, and I suspect that a whole lot of people saw for the first time that something was very wrong in their liberal, democratic worlds. Not only in the USA, but also in Canada. Had Cyril arrived in Toronto after Black Lives Matter was established, his trajectory might have been different. His personal experiences reflect the widespread ambiguities of 2012. Although many of those ambiguities still exist in the mainstream, Edward, whose mystery drives the novel’s plot, would have been astonished by the power of the Black Lives Matter movement.

I did have several occasions to rewrite the novel after the initial draft, but it wasn’t until my editor, Marc Cote, acquired it that it grew into its true life. Marc wanted to publish, and said that the structure was basically working, but the story needed more: more history, more scenes with the minor characters, more Edward. Those notes pushed me to go much deeper into Cyril and Edward. By the finish, I knew them so well that I felt I could stand in a room with them.

JS: How did doing this book change you as a person – and as a creator?

SM: As I said earlier, I began the book as an exploration of my own mixed-race identity. Part of that exercise was having my DNA analyzed, which was amazing. My ancestry turned out to span most of the globe. I am not a mix of two, but a wide mix of a great many. And that somehow supports the validity of my novel’s central question, which is, “What does it mean to be a Racialized Person in a society whose mainstream culture identifies as white? Especially for people of mixed, or in my case, multiple races?”

As a creator and first-time novelist, the tremendous response to the book has given me confidence as a writer. I know that I’ve achieved what I set out to do—and more. I want my next book to be equally challenging, and believe now that I have the skill and assurance to do it. (And, of course, hope that it will be equally well received!) Finding Edward has been a great learning experience, and the best part is knowing how well people enjoy the characters and the story.

JS: What kind of audience will this project interest? What new audience are you also seeking? Why to both questions?

SM: Just a few weeks since its publication, I have a different answer to that question than I would have had before.

I hoped that Finding Edward would attract readers who are interested in the novel’s central issues—that the same prejudices and bigotry existed in 2012 as they did all through the history of Blacks in Canada. So, most achievements, hard-fought triumphs, were, and still are ignored, unheralded, and certainly not mainstream in our Canadian cultural narrative. More generally, I anticipated that the story would be of interest to readers of literary fiction whose values are rooted in social justice—regardless of how they identity.

But I’ve been wonderfully surprised by beautiful responses to the story from ‘old, straight, white men,’ who have found many points of true engagement, particularly with the life of the older character, Edward. But also, with the much younger, Cyril. They have been very moved by their stories. Neither of my characters is exceptional. But their lives are rich, and they clearly connect with a wide variety of readers.

I would also love to think that Finding Edward will interest young people. It is a coming-of-age story— a period over a year in 2012 where Cyril, age 20, figures out who he is and how he belongs. That’s every young person’s challenge. Young people will shape Canada’s future, and they should know our Black history. I particularly hope that young, Black, readers will find the book. I want them to know that Blacks have been in Canada for a very long time, and their successes have helped shape this country — something that’s rarely acknowledged. And I want young, mixed-race folk, to own both sides of their heritage.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate about your book?

SM: That’s an interesting question. At the moment, in the early days of publication, my feeling is that the characters now belong to their readers. They’re not mine to defend, or champion, or to worry about. It’s not for me to say what’s been misunderstood, or under-appreciated. But if I’ve done my job well, readers will care about the characters, and, as they read, will come to understand how systemic racism operates, and how it has shaped Canada.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

SM: I tried to put my emotional self-knowledge into the writing. I want readers to feel what I felt for Cyril and for Edward. A strong sense of fear, trepidation, shyness, lack of confidence, embarrassment, shame, loneliness —equally tempered with pride, courage, certainty, daring, fellowship and self-assurance.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

SM: I have been in creative sectors all of my working life. But despite always giving a project my all, I have never identified as a ‘filmmaker’ or ‘sound designer’ or ‘journalist,’ or ‘fiction writer’. I’m going to change that. Finding Edward has had such a wonderful response, that now, instead of saying, “I will probably write another novel,” I can say that I will definitely write another. And because I’ve reached an age where there is less future than past, I will start it as soon as I can!

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that brought you to the creation of this work.

SM: It is, perhaps, recognizing in my early 40s that my life had moved along a rather unconventional trajectory. That was a time when I needed to know more about myself and the reason for my decisions. For instance, why had I not pursued a more traditional career path or family life.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

SM: My life has been only incidentally in the arts, although I worked in the film world in different capacities for many years. Indeed, my first film, made in the early 1980s started as a documentary, morphed into a drama and included about six musical numbers. Canada’s first docu-drama-musical! Although it found some success, it was gruelling and my co-producer and I were broke. I had to make a living, and fast, which led me to sound editing. Outsiders may find it difficult to understand that people in the arts work very hard, often over long hours and weekends, and are generally poorly paid. I now work in the non-profit sector which has some similar characteristics!

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted as yet that you would like to do in the arts

SM: When I was a teenager in England my favourite times in high school were spent in the art rooms, where a handful of us passed long days with excellent teachers. Had I stayed in England, and my studies not been interrupted by our family’s move to Toronto, I’m pretty sure I’d have gone on to art school, as my friends did. I enjoy painting and drawing now, though I’m sure that I will never make things to show or to sell!

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

SM: From my now outsider view, film and television seem to be thriving. I don’t know if it’s any easier, or harder to raise the money to create programming. What’s very different from my time—and I imagine this is true across the arts—is the competition. It’s so much harder to enter those fields, or to get into the universities or schools that credential the artists. The increased competition may simply be because our populations are much bigger — so many more people want in. On the other hand, it may be that more people can explore, develop and showcase their creative work through social media and other online venues. I am woefully absent from these, so really don’t know how well they work for artists generally.

Similarly, I don’t know enough about the writing world to comment, although I’m pretty sure that large publishing houses are less invested in nurturing writers than in making money.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create?

SM: Finding Edward is my first novel, but I’ve written and published a fair bit of short fiction. I start with very little, a sentence overheard on the street, or an image, a face, an expression. Once I have that spark, I start writing, and as I write, discover what it is I am trying to say, what’s been on my mind. It’s a wonderful experience. So, what I like best is the act of creating. Once that’s done, and the work exists—featuring people with names and purpose—it is pure pleasure to have a reader share what they found in the work.

JS: What exactly has the impact of the COVID pandemic been on your creative work and your life in the arts?

SM: As a writer, COVID has had very little impact on me. Although I can certainly say that it was truly great to be able to have an in-person book launch. That probably wouldn’t have happened had it been released any sooner!

JS: How has the pandemic changed you as a person?

SM: I don’t think it has, though I very much look forward to when we can look back at this time with objectivity. I hope it happens — that the pandemic really will end. Then I’ll know better how it’s changed not just me, but so many of us. I do think that there is a lot more anger, frustration and division than I’ve seen ever before.

JS: What’s next in the coming few years of your creative life?

SM: Another novel. And to start writing as soon as I can, but certainly in 2022!

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

NICOLAS NAMORADZE: GEORGIAN-BORN PIANIST AND COMPOSER IN SOLO RECITAL OF BACH, RACHMANINOFF, AND HIS OWN COMPOSITIONS, AT TORONTO SUMMER MUSIC 2022, IS “SOON LAUNCHING A NEW DIGITAL PLATFORM ON MUSIC AND THE MIND, IN ASSOCIATION WITH IDAGIO, THE WORLD’S LEADING CLASSICAL MUSIC STREAMING SERVICE” … A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us what you want the public to know about your work in the arts. For instance, how do you yourself describe it as a significant experience in your life and why exactly do you labour to make it exist?

NICOLAS NAMORADZE: Whether as a performer or composer, the work I do stems from the feeling and conviction that I have something to say—and music is my means of expressing it. It’s much less labor and much rather a way of life. There are many fields I am interested in, and I often wish I could have several lives to be able to pursue various careers; however, if I had to pick just one, it would without a doubt be what I am doing now.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create, as originator or as interpreter, or as both if such is the case?

NN: Whatever the nature of my work, it is as honest and true to my artistic intentions as I can make it.

JS: Please give us a brief autobiography, some stuff about yourself that is relevant to the essence of your work in the arts.

NN: I was born in 1992 in Tbilisi, Georgia, and grew up in Budapest, Hungary. I completed my undergraduate in Budapest, Vienna and Florence, and then moved to New York for my master’s at The Juilliard School and my doctorate at the CUNY Graduate Center. I was fortunate enough to study piano and composition with some of our era’s greatest masters, such as Emanuel Ax, John Corigliano, Zoltán Kocsis and András Schiff. I now pursue a busy international career as a performer and composer. It is a thrill to perform for audiences around the globe in some of the world’s most hallowed venues and collaborate with some remarkably inspiring colleagues.

Beyond my activities as a pianist and composer, I’ve also had for many years a keen interest in the cognitive sciences, and I’m currently pursuing postgraduate studies in neuropsychology at King’s College London, where my research interests include the effects of mental practice and mindfulness on musical performance.

JS: In what ways is your creative work fairly easy to do and in what ways is it difficult to realize? Why is it so?

NN: The difficulties are many, such as the relentless focus and dedication required, the immense technical demands as a performer, the challenges of interpretation, the grueling travel and performance schedules, the complex and taxing processes of composition, and so forth. However, I can’t think of anything I’d rather be doing—and while it doesn’t make it easy per se, it is all enormously meaningful and gratifying.

JS: How does doing the kind of work you do in the arts change you as a person – and as a creator?

NN: Music of course is an expression of the human condition and imagination, and by engaging with it, whether as a performer or composer, I feel that I in a sense have lived many lives, through the myriad journeys and dramatic narratives of the art itself. This breadth of experience in turn informs one’s craft—a very special cycle.

I also think that artists often end up seeing life through the lens of their craft. Not only do my ears find interest in the sonic spectrum that accompanies our lives, but I also find myself being intimately attuned to the temporal structures of our day-to-day experiences, to their underlying rhythm.

JS: What kind of audience does your work in the arts interest? What new audience are you also seeking? Why to both questions?

NN: While much of the audience of our genre consists of veteran classical music lovers, it is of course essential to bring in new audiences, and in particular the future generations of listeners. This is something of a cliché, but nonetheless true. The universality and accessibility of this music is not reflected by its current reach, and new digital media present unique opportunities that we can make the most of.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work in the arts?

NN: My artistic output is informed by my interest and curiosity in several fields, whether other artforms or realms such as the sciences; my many passions constitute the inspiration for my work.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person in the arts?

NN: Finding time! Between performing, composing, pursuing a neuropsychology degree, and launching a forthcoming digital platform, I’m doing my best to squeeze in more than 24 hours in a day.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that brought you to this point as a creative person in the arts.

NN: In terms of my professional trajectory, my international career was launched in 2018 when I won the triennial Honens International Piano Competition in Calgary.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

NN: I find that the many hours of practice and daily dedication to one’s craft involved in being a performer tends to be underestimated.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted as yet that you would like to do in the arts.

NN: I’ve written for many formations—solo instruments, chamber groups and orchestras, electronic and electroacoustic music as well scoring films and even installations—but I haven’t yet written for the stage. An opera sometime down the line would be an exciting project.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

NN: While one may always have taken a few different turns along the path, I’m happy with the direction my career is taking—and I’m still at the beginning of it, so I’m mostly looking ahead!

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s culture, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

NN: Classical music is less present that it once was in media such as TV and radio—and, more broadly, in education systems and the general cultural consciousness. However, I’d echo my answer above to the question of audiences in saying that new digital platforms offer much promise in expanding the reach of such artforms.

JS: What exactly has the impact of the COVID pandemic been on your creative work and your life in the arts?

NN: While on the one hand concert life and travel ground to a halt, many opportunities also arose on the other. I had the time to write my doctoral dissertation (which eventually became a book that has just been published), begin another degree in a rather different field, and pursue a number of unique projects in the digital sphere.

JS: How has the pandemic changed you as a person?

NN: It has made me come to appreciate for many things we used to take for granted, as well as becoming more attuned to facets of the human experience that could sometimes get lost in the hustle and bustle of our life as usual; I think this has brought a new kind of patience.

JS: What’s next in the coming few years of your life in the arts?

NN: Many exciting projects are on the horizon for the upcoming season, including residencies at the Honens International Piano Competition and the Florida Grand Piano Series; recital appearances at the Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival, Le Festival Radio France Occitanie Montpellier, Beethovenfest Bonn, Miami International Piano Festival, Kulturpalast Dresden and Lugano Musica, among others; a tour of duo recitals for piano and electronic marimba with Lukas Ligeti to mark György Ligeti’s centenary in 2023; and a series of concerto performances with multiple Canadian orchestras of a new work written for me by Kati Agócs. I am also soon launching a new digital platform on music and the mind, in association with IDAGIO, the world’s leading classical music streaming service—this will definitely be a major focus of mine during the upcoming period.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

AFARIN MANSOURI: AWARD-WINNING COMPOSER, LIBRETTIST AND MUSICOLOGIST, WITH NEW OPERA ZULEYKHA AT TORONTO SUMMER MUSIC FESTIVAL ON JULY 13, DECLARES “PRIORITY MUST BE GIVEN TO AUTHENTICITY AND INTEGRITY” …A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us what you want the public to know about your work in the arts. For instance, how do you yourself describe it as a significant experience in your life and why exactly do you labor to make it exist?

AFARIN MANSOURI: I use my creativity as a vehicle for closeness of cultural traditions, creating awareness and values. My compositions are my adventures in exploring life and going beyond the limits of borders and cultures. To me, art is a tool to manifest and reflect our transcendental desires and thoughts, to make connections and to bring unity and closeness.

I hope that my artistic creations can act like a bridge, connecting my Iranian background to the world. Creativity is my nature and I try to use my art as a way of practicing gratefulness. I am inspired by everything in this world, from an emotional experience, to what I see in the nature, or a painting, a dance, poetry, listening to the news about science or war, and even talking to an unknown person. I believe everything in the world has an interesting story, which gives it depth and meaning, and I like to reflect these stories from my own perspective in my music and artistic creations.

I believe creativity does not have boundaries and limitations. Creativity is connected to a source that is beyond the borders and lines we draw as humans, lines such as race or gender that we have created in this world which only divide us. I believe as an artist that our legacy in this life could be the impact we have on our community and our making the connections we build through our art.

So why exactly do I labour to make it exist?  Why do I create? I believe being creative is like being a boiling spring in nature, it’s there, it happens and can’t be stopped. One must learn how to channel it, to use it properly and not to waste. To me creativity is like the power of life that wants to experience something unique through my body and mind. All I have to do is to let it happen and not block this force. It’s sometimes scary, but also very beautiful.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create, as originator or as interpreter, or both?

AM: There are so many things I like about what I create. Not necessarily the product, but the process. First phase is changing ideas to notes and words on the paper. Basically, creating something from nothing! It’s so magical, it finds its own way sometimes without my thinking too much or planning, I have just trusted this voice and let it find its own way! Then the second great phase is when performers give this music creation a life by playing it. I like to call this phase “Breathing the soul into a body!”. And then the third phase is the impact it has on the audience and the audience feedback. Hearing their experience and witnessing how they have made connection and what their experiences were and what they have learnt.

Originality is a very tricky subject to talk about. In my opinion and generally speaking, we are all a hierarchy and an extension of the past generations of human efforts and experiences. So, the only original thing is the nature and existence. Human creation is only a limited interpretation of a single being’s experience in this vast existence, which is affected by the past.

However, we can say that we try to be authentic when creating something. Meaning that we are not copying something and calling it our own.

Depends on who the audience is, my compositions may sound original to some, and strange to some others; and totally familiar and not original to come and super innovative to others. Everything is relative.  For example, A Persian Tango might be new and innovative to Persian ears because Tango is not Iranian, but is it original? No! Or a Farsi opera with an Eastern Tale and Eastern Exotic instruments might sound new and exciting to many non- Farsi speakers, but is it original? We may say it is authentic. Is my music new and original? In a way yes, it is because I do not steal my ideas from others! Is it original, because it comes from my mind, but it is also connected to a history of humanity and my relation to this history?

JS: Please give us an autobiography, some stuff about yourself that is relevant to the essence of your work in the arts.

AM: I am a female Iranian Canadian Composer. I grew up in Iran, a country where women are not permitted to sing. So, to be a female composer/singer and writing an opera is an exceptional act of defiance and courage on a personal level. I started playing piano when I was 8. My love for opera began at age 14, when I saw the video of Bizet’s Carmen for the first time. Having access to such a video during wartime was a forbidden act but brought me feelings of joy. I remember those joyful moments were cut off by the sirens, warning us to find a secure place due to an air raid. Since then, I have developed a lifelong passion for opera.

When I came to Canada in 2002, I started my academic training in music and chose music composition as my path. I now hold a Ph.D. in music.  During all these years I found out how much I like to tell stories through my music, and that connected me more to opera.

In 2010, I co-founded Iranian-Canadian Composers of Toronto, a not-for-profit organization (now acts as a collective) along with 4 other colleagues of mine. I was acting as Artistic Director of this organization from 2010 to 2019. During this period, we produced more than 30 new musical productions and collaborated with organizations such as National Ballet of Canada, Nuit Blanche, and different festivals and orchestras. All of these productions had a story to tell: Love, identity, immigration, …

In 2016, after I finished my Master Studies at University of Toronto, I was lucky to be accepted by Tapestry opera’s LibLab and I could create 4 operatic scenes by working with 4 different writers, addressing different contemporary issues such as gender suppression, and political and social issues. Collaboration with Tapestry Opera resulted in creation of my first fully staged opera with this company. In 2018, my opera “Forbidden” gained national and international attention through the Globe and Mail and BBC as I explored my new approach to combine Eastern music with traditional opera. BBC Farsi made a documentary film based on this work for Farsi speaking people around the world. It was for the first-time that an audience could hear opera performed by Persian instruments and also mixed with hip hop music.

During 2010-2019 I collaborated with Canadian Opera Company as an advocate of opera, introducing opera to the communities who have not been exposed to this genre. For the first time in the history of this company, I gave a lecture in Farsi on some of the production to the community who has been banned from seeing an opera. I was also acting as a teaching artist, teaching multiple opera workshops to youth and children, plus being a member while working with COC’s diversity, equity and inclusivity committee.

My last production with ICOT was the creation of the operatic composition “Saffronic” as part of the stage production The Journey, Notes of Hope which considers the issues surrounding immigration and building of new identity. This operatic work is based on poetry of Banu Zan, a contemporary Iranian-Canadian poet writer.

In January 2020, I released my first Children’s Audio Opera “Little Heart” with Centre disc. This work is inspired by an Iranian children’s book about a girl who is trying to learn what love is!

After the Pandemic, I was lucky to be able to continue my composing and created my first digital opera AITCH ARR written by Donna-Michelle St Bernard. It was performed by Queen’s University opera.

I founded Cultureland, an organization to commission new works which centre on the exploration of non-western elements in terms of language, drama, music or design and I am hoping to create, produce and direct more operas in the future.

This summer I feel so lucky that the first Act of My Farsi opera “Zuleykha” is being produced and workshopped by Loose Tea Theatre and Toronto Summer Music Festival. This opera is introducing so many mystical and spiritual eastern symbols and poetry with opera to the Western audience. This opera presents the inner journey of the Biblical female character Zuleykha who was known as Potiphar’s wife. In texts, she has been regarded as a sinner and seducer of Prophet Joseph, however that perspective is from those that have been in control of her story: men. I have spent years reading and researching all the different texts and stories that Zuleyhka has been mentioned in. This opera completes and continues her story from a female perspective. It portrays the challenges she had to overcome in a male dominant society in order to find her inner voice. It is a combination of history and fiction and spirituality. The opera symbolizes the inner journey of Zuleykha in different stages: Quest, Love, Knowledge, Independence, Unity, Bewilderment and Deprivation and Doom.

The libretto is written by me in Farsi and incorporates the writings of poetry of mystic philosophers such as Rumi, Hafiz and Attar. The music of opera is open to all the people on the earth beyond cultures and borders. Language wise, the audience will experience the poetic Farsi language and sound of many traditional instruments. It combines opera with old Eastern “Maqaam” music with melismatic singing and traditional Iranian recitative style.

The score is for a mixture of Western and Eastern Instruments. We hope to fully stage this work soon in the next year.

JS: In what way is your creative work fairly easy to do and in what ways  is it difficult to realize?

AM: Journalism and Media play a huge role in this. I have different experiences when it comes to realization of my work. These days it really depends on the proper way of marketing your work and if the artist is not an entrepreneur, and the work of an artist is presented by other organizations, it is their responsibility to make sure they are introducing the artist and their works properly. But if the artist is an entrepreneur, then it’s going to be even harder. I have been there. You have to learn a lot of skills like marketing, promotion, fundraising, all of which takes away energy and time from your creativity – or you need funds to hire proper skilled people to do it for you and funding is hard.

JS: How does the kind of work you do in the art change you as a person and as a creator?

AM: Creativity helped me to learn about myself, many aspects of my soul I was not even aware of. I also learn a lot from other artists when we perform a piece, and by exchanging ideas and sharing thoughts and artistic exchanges I learn something new every day. It is a never-ending learning process. I am learning how to let go of being a perfectionist, and accepting the resources are in reach and using them the best way I can.

JS: What kind of audience does your work in the arts interest? What new audience are you also seeking? Why to both questions?

AM: I normally do not think about choosing a certain type of audience, as I like to make soul connection and pass on the meanings, unless the work is targeting a certain age, for example, a musical for kids age 4-7. Many audiences like to listen to vocal works that are pronounced correct in terms of language and sometimes this brings difficulty to my work. For example, we do not have so many Iranian opera singers who can sing Farsi.

I am hoping to attract audience from all backgrounds, people who are open to try new experiments, hear new stories, and give honest feedback.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work in the arts?

AM: My integrity, my honesty and authenticity

JS: What is your biggest challenge as a creative person in the art?

AM: Limited resources and funding to showcase and share whatever I have created so far in my life.  It is difficult not to lose hope and not to block my creativity because of this and keep creating.

JS: Please describe a major turning point in your life that brought you to this point as a creative person in the arts.

AM: Immigration to Canada; deciding to pursue my dreams in music.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

AM: I don’t know what you mean! Who is an outsider?

If you mean people who are not artists, I believe what they may not understand is the amount of time, energy and effort an artist spends to create a work that they may watch in a short amount of time. For example, many years to create an opera, while audience only enjoy it for 2 hours.  People active in other fields mostly see the final productions and cheer the exciting parts. What they do not know is the hard journey and sometimes the dark moments each artist has to take to get to that point.

Also, people who do not travel to see the world, or have not immigrated, have different perspective about life and are perhaps a bit more limited than those who do.

But in general, my perspective in life is different. Art has an educational value, so it can teach.  I do not like to divide life and relationships by using outsider and insider. I try to work from heart, and I believe this pure energy can find its way to those it should. We are all one, we need to learn that about one another if we are interested to learn!

JS: Please tell us what you have not attempted yet that you would like to do in the arts.

1)Acting and singing in at least one operatic production, especially my own work.

2)Directing at least one of my own operas.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it?

AM: Nothing really. But perhaps the only thing I would change is that I could sing more and could put my shyness and fears away much earlier so I could do many more artistic activities including singing and performance on the stage.  Also, I am very much into creating and not very skilled in presenting myself as well as I should, especially the way social media works these days.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s culture, including forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

AM: The openness of minds gives me hope. The openness to try variety, new ideas, and moving on. What is depressing is creating divisions and borders to marginalize people.

The most super depressing thing for me is lack of communication and being stubborn in staying in a close-minded state and not open to try new things at least once and then deciding. How can we know if we like something before we try it?

Another thing so depressing is when humans are dividing themselves based on gender, race, age, wealth, etc. to give priority to themselves. Priority must be given to authenticity and integrity not anything else. Calling one group white, the other group minority, underserved, …. it’s super depressing.  Art is created from a place where none of these matter.

JS: What exactly has the impact of the Covid pandemic been on your creative work and your life in the arts?

AM: I was actually very lucky as I could do a lot of work during the pandemic.

In March 2021, I could workshop and film one of my Farsi operas in collaboration with Loose Tea Music Theatre and Kingstone Watershed festival.

In Spring 2021, I could create my first digital online opera “AITCH ARR”in collaboration with Queen’s University School of Music and Drama, and librettist Donna- Michelle St Bernard.  It was a comic opera, performed at different times with different groups in different online settings. (You can still watch it online on YouTube)

In Summer 2021 I started working with De Jeniffer Wise and Liza Balkan on a new opera called Refugee.

In Fall 2021, I started developing another opera called Hypatia with libretto by Alan Olejniczak.

During 2021, I also collaborated with Seattle opera as a composer, worked with 11 different writers and created music for 11 different operatic scenes.

In Winter 2022 I composed my orchestral prelude for the 100 anniversaries of Toronto Symphony Orchestra titled “Mithra”, about the goddess of love. It was premiered May 2022 in Roy Thomson Hall and I could attend the performance in person!

I started the first phase of recording of my first vocal album in collaboration with Thin Edge Music Collective, while working on preparation of the score of my Farsi Opera Zuleykha for Toronto Summer Music Festival and Loose Tea Theatre. I am also working with Fresh Squeeze Opera to develop an Aria for my new opera Hypatia.

JS: How has the pandemic changed you as a person?

AM: I now value the human relationships and how much we need in-person meetings and gatherings to exchange our energy.

JS: What is next in the coming years of your life in the arts?

AM: Hopefully, the 4 operas I have in my hand, acting and singing in at least one of them and gaining experience in how to direct an opera.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

ALAN LUCIEN ØYEN: “THE MOST POWERFUL THING IS TO BE ABLE TO BE QUIET TOGETHER” SAYS CELEBRATED NORWEGIAN WRITER, DIRECTOR, CHOREOGRAPHER FROM HARBOURFRONT DURING RUN OF “STORY, STORY, DIE” …. A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about one or more projects that you have been working on or have recently completed. Why exactly do they matter to you and why should they matter to others?

ALAN LUCIEN ØYEN: All my work is created in response to “now”. I find inspiration everywhere around me. So, the times we live in are bound to influence the work. I always start with dialogue and creative exchange through dialogue with the cast I’m working with. With the work we’re currently touring in Canada, Story, story, die. our starting point was the concept of “staging” – how we fictionalize our everyday life in when we exchange with other people. The theatricality of producing vignettes and trailers from our lives is particularly terrifying on social media, but I think it has to do with something innately human. We are story tellers. But the concept of acceleration and dialogue that is becoming noise, because we are responding to each other with no wait/process time is scary and something that greatly influenced the work. I hope and think this make it relevant to our audiences today.

JS: How did doing these projects change you as a person and as a creator?

ALO: I don’t think it’s possible to trace change. It happens slowly constantly. Sure, my work affects me and changes within me, but no more or less than life itself. The past 15 years life and work has been the same and it constantly changes me and itself. Hopefully it’s evolution. I try to learn from every encounter I make.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate about the work you produce or do?

ALO: I hope very little(!)

I consider performing art a true social project, in terms that it comes about through exchange between a big group of people working tighter, (as opposed to writing or painting, which is an activity that can happen alone). Equally I believe I dialogue with the audience. If there is no dialogue, or if the work does not communicate, I have failed as an artist and a creator. Accessibility to the work is therefore very much at the forefront of my creative processes.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

ALO: Listening. My mother says, we have two ears and one mouth. Observation is key. I am an emotional person and also a believer in dialogue. I try to create emotional work that is somehow eager to engage with the audience, this is probably because of how I am as a person.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

ALO: To create. On the spot. I once read that to create a Japanese Haiku poem – in addition to the specific rules – there were “rules” that said the poem should “come from a happy place” and that the work should “feel easy.” I try to live by this. A challenge is always setting up the parameters for such creation in a pressurized environment. But I aim to and try to.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire because of their work in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

ALO: I think the most powerful thing is to be able to be quiet together. It’s difficult and exciting and when that is true and there is understanding through silence that’s very powerful. I’d love to sit quietly with Pina Bausch, Ingmar Bergman and Nina Simone.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

ALO: I can’t recall. I find everything in life influences me, whether I like it or not/am aware or not.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

ALO: I sometimes get “what do you do in the daytime?” That’s a hopeless conversation.

“How do you remember all the words?” – That is not so magical to me, as there is logic to words.

“How do you remember all the movements?” – This really IS magic to me, because it’s all abstract.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted as yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

ALO: I say my works on the stage are poor excuses for not making films. I will eventually get round to it. I’ve been given too many opportunities that I would have had to pass up on to pursue film, so I’ve waited. I think / hope the exchange from theatre will help me make the films I’d like to make.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

ALO: Maybe be more ballsy. I know so much about life in the arts is a game of opportunities. And I’m feeling very grateful for all that I have been allowed to be a part of without actively raising my hand. But what if I hadn’t been afraid to raise my hand?

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

ALO: I’m greatly inspired by the fact that people are willing to sit down in person and listen to other people’s thoughts/ideas/problems and solutions. I think that’s powerful and what is needed in real life.

I’m terrified by the internet and the speed of which it’s changing us and the world we live in. It facilitates for some much beauty, but at such a cost. We get it all immediately now, yes. But we’ve lost waiting, for instance. And we’re burning our candle from both ends.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create and/or do?

ALO: The fact that I get to exchange with other people through both the process and the presentation of the work. The be given the power to suggest ideas to the world is an honor.

JS: In your creative life thus far, what have been the most helpful comments you have heard about your work?

ALO: I can’t recall.

JS: Finally, what do you yourself find to be the most intriguing and/or surprising things about you?

ALO: Intriguing and surprising are words I can’t use to describe myself. If they apply at all someone else has to be the judge of.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

DANIEL CARTER, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS + PROGRAMMING OF TORONTO’S BUDDIES IN BAD TIMES THEATRE, ON THE NEW NATIONAL QUEER AND TRANS PLAYWRITING UNIT AND THE IMPORTANCE OF DIVERSE VOICES TO BE HEARD WITHIN THE ARTS…. A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

See the source image

 

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about the recently launched Unit. Why exactly does it matter to you and why should it matter to us?

DANIEL CARTER: The National Queer and Trans Playwriting Unit is a new initiative that aims to support playwrights creating new queer performance works. The idea was originally conceived by ZeeZee Theatre who brought together companies from across Canada – some with queer specific mandates, some without – with the aim of supporting five playwrights financially and artistically as they develop their work. The unit will conclude with a public reading of their work, and a commitment of further development and/or production of the work by the consortium of companies.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate in the work you produce or do?

DC: A lot of the work that Buddies produces comes out of our Residency Program, which is focused on deep and long-term development. The projects seen on stage spend anywhere between 3 to 5…sometimes 7 years in development, often moving through several iterations before being publicly presented. What you see on stage is really 10% of the work, whereas the other 90% is the collaborative process of creation and experimentation…and lots of meetings, emails and grant writing.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

DC: I love questions. I love bad ideas. I love exquisite pressure. I think these are all quite generative in a (creative) process. And I think I try to bring this to the work I do as a collaborator, producer, and administrator.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

DC: Tough question. My impulse was to say time to be creative. But I think there is a lot of space to be creative in the day-to-day of my role. However, when I recall freelancing and working contract positions – having more of a portfolio career – money and regular income was a consistent challenge. This is one of the reasons why I’m very excited about the Queer and Trans Playwriting Unit – the financial resources it offers to artists, so they can actually afford time and space to focus on creation, is really wonderful, and hopefully provides some sense of security.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

DC: Stay focused. Hustle. And take time to rest!

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

DC: I think my time spent at Factory Theatre in one of their new work development programs was very grounding for me as an early-career artist and having just returned to Toronto. Factory was my first “Yes” in Toronto theatre after a long list of “Nos.” (Also any time spent around Nina is time well spent. She’s just incredibly insightful, caring yet no-nonsense, and honestly just cool.)

What’s wonderful about these units are the connections and relationships built with new collaborators and new mentors, and I hope the artists who are invited into the National Queer and Trans Playwrights Unit share a similar experience. I think the networks and communities that can be shared by the ten theatre companies with the incoming artists is really thrilling and hopefully creates relationships that help to support and further the development of these new works.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

DC: It can be pretty consuming. Maybe that’s just me – but I don’t think so. Whether you’re working on a project or within a company, I think that arts work is “sticky” in the sense that it stays with you. After you leave the office, close your computer, leave the rehearsal hall – thoughts, ideas, questions pop up and percolate. I find, for myself, it’s sometimes difficult to ignore those things as they arise or pin them for later for when I’m “back at work.” This was especially true throughout the pandemic when I lived/worked in the same space – that physical line between personal life and work life became a lot more blurry. Looking at the Unit, and the layers of structure and support that are built into its foundation (i.e., dramaturgical sessions, one-on-one mentors, working with the consortium of theatres), I feel as though there is a lot of space to build a working model that allows for the balance between work and life.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

DC: Great question, but honestly after the past two years of constant pivots and adapting, I just want to do a good old fashioned staged reading of something.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

DC: I think I’d want to be a bit more bold. I remember sitting in a bit of an info session with someone from Playwrights Guild of Canada, and the person leading it shared something that I echo to anyone who would listen, which is: just apply for that thing; a group of people are going to read your work, read about who you are and what you’re interested in, even if you don’t get that thing (award, residency, acceptance to a program) there is now a group of people who know who you are, who know about your work, and can keep you in mind for future opportunities. And I would definitely echo that sentiment for those thinking about applying to this newly launched Unit.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

DC: I think a lot of important conversations are happening around arts policy, equitable work, and working models, and seeing small shifts that have the ability to lead to larger shifts is very exciting. It feels as though there’s an openness to experiment, alongside a fearlessness to inquire and interrogate, which I think is a wonderful pairing for changemaking.

I’ve worked with a lot of early-career artists so far in my work, and seeing how they prioritize health and safety, care, and equitable payment – and really at the end of the day: people – is, I think, a strong indicator of the direction the arts sector is heading. And so, I’m hopeful that a sustainable future (through an environmental lens, financial lens, and human resources lens) is on the horizon.

JS: If you yourself were a critic of the arts discussing your work, be it something specific or in general, what would you say?

DC: I think any company that is queer mandated and strives to serve a community as expansive as our queer communities is a huge undertaking. It needs a one size fits one approach when working with communities. Sometimes we do it successfully, sometimes not. But looking back on this year, seeing our digital/hybrid/in-person programming, how we’ve been centring artists and their process, and making adjustments to our ways of working, is all really wonderful.

JS: Finally, what do you yourself find to be the most intriguing and/or surprising things about you?

DC: Oh, I’m such a boring person…but I have a black belt in kung fu!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BARBARA KANERATONNI DIABO ON HER DANCE PRODUCTION SKY DANCERS, – THE STORY OF 33 MOHAWK IRONWORKERS WHO LOST THEIR LIVES IN THE QUEBEC BRIDGE COLLAPSE OF 1907 – EXPLAINS “I PUT MY LOVE, MY PAIN, MY HEART, MY TIME, MY BODY, AND MY SPIRIT INTO THIS PIECE” ….AT HARBOURFRONT’S FLECK THEATRE ON MAY 20-22ND, 2022…. A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about one or more projects that you have been working on or have recently completed or are upcoming (Sky Dancers). Why exactly do they matter to you and why should they matter to us?

BARBARA KANERATONNI DIABO: Indigenous arts have been discouraged, hidden, ignored, or even illegal for so long, it is important for everyone to support Indigenous arts now. It is important for everyone to respect and know the stories of this land and its first peoples who are still here.

Sky Dancers is my latest completed dance production that will next be shown at Harbourfront Fleck Theatre on May 20-22nd, 2022. It is a true story that is important to me personally, my community of Kahnawake, and as I have learned, becomes important to everyone who learns about it. It is the story of the 33 Mohawk ironworkers who lost their lives when the Quebec Bridge collapsed in 1907 while under construction, as well as the stories of their families and the community. This disaster was a huge event in the engineering world, Canada, and of course, my community of Kahnawake, where these ironworkers lived.

My great-grandfather was one of the ironworkers who died on the bridge that day. This production is important to me because it has affected my family and many others in my community. Researching and creating this show has brought a better understanding about my roots and my present. I believe that this story will bring better understandings to all about Indigenous people, their contributions, their challenges, and their resilience. It has universal elements in it that all people can understand about loss, tragedy, and family.

Of course, I have other projects in the works, but more to come on that another time!

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate in the work you produce or do?

BKD: I created this work so it could be understood by anyone – dance fans, people who never watch dance, Indigenous, non-Indigenous, etc. We use many elements, such as video, storytelling, lights, an elaborate set, and dance to create a full story. Certain small things that come from our culture – certain dances, songs – may not be fully understood, but I believe are still appealing to all.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

BKD: That’s a tough question! It touches on some delicate subjects, such as death, loss, and residential school, so of course there were times when I felt vulnerable or triggered. But the importance of telling this story overrode that and helped me find the courage to keep going. I put my love, my pain, my heart, my time, my body, and my spirit into this piece.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

BKD:  It varies. Unpeeling through the layers of ideas to find the “right” clarity in a project to share. Trusting the creative process even in the “low” or challenging moments. Trying to convince some people of the great importance of arts. And of course, balancing organizational challenges, such as scheduling, funding, and other logistics with the creation process in the studio.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

BKD: I would say: Hi! I love your work. Thank you for being inspiring!

You would have to ask them for their answer…but maybe they would say “thanks”!

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

BKD: Hmmm…I feel every day that new things, events, and people influence me in my life. But if I had to choose…

1- Moving back to Montreal (from Nova Scotia) and teaching high school in my community of Kahnawake (right beside Montreal). It helped me re-connect with my community and learn more about my culture, when before I did not have as much access to it because I grew up away from it much of my life.

2- Going to the Native Theatre School in Ontario (which later became the Centre for Indigenous Theatre). It was the first time that I was in an environment that allowed me to connect and explore my culture with my art.

3- Becoming a mother. Priorities change and your heart grows!

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

BKD: Sometimes people seem to see artists as less important in society. That artists are less intelligent than those in science, for example. There can be great intelligence in all sectors.

Also, some people don’t realize how much work and time is put into one performance.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

BKD: I would like to tour more internationally. When I became more ready for this, that’s when COVID hit.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

BKD: I am not sure how to answer that – I am who I am today because of everything I have lived. And I like me!

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

BKD: What gives me hope is that it seems that organizations seem to be making more real commitments and actions to support Indigenous arts.

What sometimes brings me down is that some of these conversations have been already been going on for so many years – are we making change or is history just repeating? There is still a lot of work to do…it extends way beyond just the arts.

JS: If you yourself were a critic of the arts discussing your work, be it something specific or in general, what would you say?

BKD: Ha ha – next question.

JS: Finally, what do you yourself find to be the most intriguing and/or surprising things about you?

BKD: I am always curious and love learning. I often say that I feel like an eternal beginner. I still take dance classes in new styles that I don’t know. I will never learn everything that I want to before I die.

…oh yeah – and I am an absolute science-fiction geek! I think many people don’t expect that of me!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

CANADIAN DANCE ARTIST ANNE PLAMONDON IN HARBOURFRONT CENTRE CHOREOGRAPHIC DEBUT WITH “ONLY YOU” – VULNERABILITY AND ACCEPTANCE DANCED IN DUET ..…A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about one or more projects that you have been working on or have recently completed. Why exactly do they matter to you and why should they matter to us?

ANNE PLAMONDON: Last fall, I choreographed on the production Vanishing Mélodies of BJM. A dance and theater show with the music of Patrick Watson. I also worked with the students of Arts Umbrella school in Vancouver last January. Both of these projects give me the opportunity to develop my practice and my work, as well as encouraging the transmission of our discipline to the next generation.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate in the work you produce or do?

AP: This is an interesting question. I never think about that.

When I make work, I don’t worry about what others will not appreciate. I prefer to focus on the things that they might appreciate or relate to, and find a compelling way to share it through dance.  I focus on things that matter to me, such as creating movement that is interesting, intriguing or mysterious. I also wish to address issues that touch me personally, hoping it reaches other people’s hearts as well.

I also take the creative process very seriously. I believe in the power of getting together to make something. And how rich the energy of a group of dancers and collaborators can be.

I am fully aware that my work might not please everyone, and I admit, it is not always easy to accept. But I know that making stuff is partly my doing, my conscious decisions, my abilities etc…And another part is more mysterious and holistic somehow.

There is a pretty big part of intuition in my process.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

AP: I would say…my dance background, my influences, are important parts of myself that I put into my work. Every day, I come with everything I got. All my abilities, knowledge and my experiences as a performance for 25 years. All the people I learned from too.

My work is defined by my history as a dancer and as a person. I bring all of that into the studio. Even my fears and doubts. And my bravery. At least, that’s what I try to do every day.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

AP: The challenges are also what makes my job a very exciting one. It is not a routine. My agenda varies constantly, which makes it a bit complicated when you have a family.

I can never rely on my past successes. I am an endless student, and I must continue to be curious about everything in life.

There is also a certain amount of uncertainty that comes with creation, that I have to be ok with. Every creation has a different process. I have to stay open and flexible, in order to find its hidden treasures.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

AP: I’ve been very fortunate to learn from brilliant artists in my career. Some I had the chance to say thank you. Others not. Some, I was too young to recognize the chance I had to learn from them.

So, I would say thank you.

And I hope they would say “I always believed in you”.

The ones I admire from a distance but never had the chance to meet. Uhm… I guess I would engage in a conversation about art and its role in the world.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

AP: There’s been a few turning points, but becoming a mother was a major pivotal event. In all the most positive ways.

My daughter brought a lot of meaning and balance to my life. Dancing and creating is now more of a playground for curiosity, self-accomplishment and giving back.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

AP: This one is hard to respond to because I cannot speak for others. But I can speak from experience. The kind of misunderstanding I witness sometimes, is the fact that what I dois actually a real job. It is hard to believe, but there is still a misunderstanding about that. Sometimes, people don’t understand the amount of commitment required to develop and thrive as a dance artist.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

AP: I have a lot of faith in the dance evolution and its capacity to engage an audience, a reflection, and provoke change. Movement is a universal language that brings people together, in thoughts and emotions.  In this time where we need connection more than ever, I believe dance can help healing lots of our traumas.

See the source image

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A TRIBUTE POEM TO MY UKRAINIAN UNCLE WASYL, FROM 1984

BACKGROUND: My mother’s mother and her uncle, born Wasyl and later called Charlie, were born in Ukraine. I loved both very deeply and, with limited facility, would speak Ukrainian as a child to each one. When Charlie died, I wrote this poem and it became the first of my poems to appear in a literary journal (Fiddlehead) and then in my first book of poetry (Bones to Bury). I’m sure that you can understand why, in these days of Putin’s acts of genocide, that I am posting this tribute to a gentle and kind Ukrainian man.

WASYL SZEWCZYK

 by James Strecker (c) 1984

This method I learned

from Charlie:

After the meal

wash your bowl and spoon.

Let them dry

on the counter

until you eat again.

Be patient.

He was a bachelor.

In his seventh decade

they brought women,

like weather-beaten cattle,

to the timid man’s home

for him to take in

marriage. He rejected

the sagging Polish

widows and their matchmade

schemes for his land.

He left the house and garden

in a will. There was little

else: four boxes of novels

describing sophisticated

bachelors and accessible blondes,

and a handful of age-ruined

photographs, the girl

beautiful in 1921.

Had he loved her?

He wanted to nod his head yes,

but couldn’t.

He left an epithet, Charlie,

a handy anglicized substitute

for the alien Wasyl.

We removed two kinds of shirts

from his room: white shirts

covered with cellophane, then

dust (these should not be spoiled

too soon by common labourer’s

use) and others laden with sweat,

odors of work eating the fibres.

He wasted nothing, not even

his life.

Wasyl Szewczyk is dead,

Wasyl Szewczyk of Galicia,

a Ukrainian serf from a feudal

age who despised the priest

and his landowner’s god.

He had seen a pregnant girl

beaten by holy fists, had

fled to a dirty coal mining

town, a fourteen hour shift,

and wept from the pain

of his burned, bandaged hands.

His fingers learned to play

the clarinet, cut hair

with a barber’s expertise,

hold a book of Shevchenko’s

poetry. He was attuned, like

spring, to the delicacy

of creation.

At meals, he belched with

thanks, a peasant.

He lies buried in Beausejour,

Manitoba where he once pastured

cows, and his hair was black

as a rain-soaked prairie field.

Wasyl Szewczyk is dead.

There was little to say after him.

We lacked his wit, was it peasant

or Slavic, that taunted death

as a nuisance and friend.

He knew the dead to be lucky.

What aspect knows the man?

He posed unsmiling for photographs.

He lived a long life,

should have hated the world.

He wore a suit on Sundays.

Charlie Szewcyzk, the farmer

Wasyl, died last April

in his eightieth year.

At seventy-five

he had learned to play

the violin.

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BOOKS YOU MUST READ: 32 plus 27 RECOMMENDED BOOKS

RECOMMENDED BOOKS 32 plus 27

These are some of the books I’ve read or re-read or have kept dipping into over the last few years. The few I’ve disliked shall remain absent and anonymous, but the titles in the following two lists have so very much to offer, that I ask you to check them out.

 The 27 books in LIST #2 include comments about them from my previous blogs. For the 32 books in LIST #1, about which I have no comments for now, I suggest you Google them and read about them until you feel you cannot live without them.

LIST # 1

1–Sad Little Men: Private Schools and the Ruin of England by Richard Beard

2–Piano Notes by Charles Rosen

3–Encounter by Milam Kundera

4–Venice by Marie-Jose Gransard

5–Solitude by Anthony Storr

6–Felice by Georges Simenon

7–The Blue Room by Georges Simenon

8–A Maigret Christmas and Other Stories by Georges Simenon

9–The Rough Guide to Punk by Al Spicer

10–Hollywood Lesbians: From Garbo to Foster by Boze Hadleigh

11–The Indispensable Composers: A Personal Guide by Anthony Tommasini

12–Great Philosophers Who Failed at Love by Andrew Shaffer

13–Legendary Voices Volumes 1 & 2 by Nigel Douglas

14-The Art of Reading: An Illustrated History of Books in Print by Jamie Camplin & Maria Ranauro

15-Carringtons Letters, Dora Carrington: Her Art, Her Loves, Her Friendships Edited by Anne Chisholm

16-The Globe Guide to Shakespeare: The Plays, The Productions, The Life

17-The Annotated Big Sleep by Raymond Chandler

18-A Writer’s Notebook by W. Somerset Maugham

19-The Politics of Experience by R. D. Laing

20- Love Letters Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville-West

21-The Seagull Anton Chekhov Translated by Nelson, Pevear, Volokhonsky

22- Eminent Victorians: The Illustrated Edition by Lytton Strachey

23-Six Poets Hardy to Larkin: An Anthology by Alan Bennett

24- The Anchor Anthology of French Poetry from Nerval to Valery

25-Poirot and Me by David Suchet

26-The Essential Neruda: Selected Poems

27-The Complete Poems of Anne Akhmatova trans by Judith Hemschemeyer

28-Music in Art by Ausoni

29-Artists’ Techniques and Materials by Antonella Fuga

30-Love and the Erotic in Art by Stefano Zuffi

31-The Complete Kobzar: The Poetry of Taras Shevchenko trans Peter Fedynsky

32-W. H. Auden: Selected Poems

 

LIST #2 

1- If You Should Fail by Joe Moran

2-Casablanca: Script and Legend

3-Dark City: The Lost World of Film Noir by Eddie Mueller

4-The Story of Women and Art

5-Curious History of Sex by Kate Lister

6-Clothes Clothes Clothes Music Music Music Boys Boys Boys by Viv Albertine  

7-Fighting Theory: Avital Ronell in Conversation with Anne Dufourmantelle. Translated by Catherine Porter

8-The Films of Fay Wray by Roy Kinnard and Tony Crnkovich

9-Complicated Women: Sex and Power in Pre-Code Hollywood by Mike Lasalle

10-Fantasyland: How America Went Haywire, A 500-Year Study by Kurt Andersen

11-Miriam Hopkins: Life and Films of a Hollywood Rebel by Allan R. Ellenberger

12-Early Recordings and Musical Style; changing tastes in instrumental performance 1900-1950 by Robert Philip

13-Beethoven’s Conversation Books Volume 1 Nos. 1 To 8 (February to March 1820 Edited and Translated by Theodore Albrecht

14-The Uninhabitable Earth by David Wallace-Wells

15-The Poems of Catullus: A Bilingual Edition Translated with Commentary by Peter Green

16-Time Pieces: A Dublin Memoir by John Banville

17-Peggy to her Playwrights: The Letters of Margaret Ramsey, Play Agent’ with an Introduction by Simon Callow

18-Bright-Sided: How Positive Thinking is Undermining America’ Barbara Ehrenreich

19-Elizabeth Vigée Le Brun: The Odyssey of an Artist in an Age of Revolution

20-The Band: Pioneers of Americana Music by Craig Harris and The Band FAQ: All That’s Left to Know About the Fathers of Americana.

21-From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies (from 1974 and now revised and reissued in 1987) by film critic Molly Haskell

22-Women Who Read Are Dangerous by Stefan Bollman

23-Yasujiro Ozu by Donald Ritchie

24-This is Shakespeare by Emma Smith

25-The Jazz Singers: The Ultimate Guide, published by Backbeat Books, Yanow

26-Shakespeare for the People: Working-Class Readers 1800-1900,

27-University of Toronto: An Architectural Tour Larry Wayne Richards’

 

1-IF YOU SHOULD FAIL BY JOE MORAN: We live and we fail, repeatedly, over and over, endlessly. Why? Because we are alive, because we are human. Of course, you can’t tell this to the folks at McMaster University near my home, since they promise, blank at heart and thus blanketly, the achievement of excellence to all who enter here (thank you, Dante, for “Abandon all hope, ye who enter here” – but that was another kind of hell). Moran eschews the automatic, empty-souled, and out-of-touch, cowardly “positive thinking” of our time and prefers our looking into the mirror, where fourth-placed Olympians and Leonard da Vinci (yes, even the master reconsidered as a failure) also dwell. One feels a new beauty to one’s fucked-up life while reading Moran’s hard-hitting but insightful, provocative, and very kind book.

2-CASABLANCA: SCRIPT AND LEGEND: Certainly, there are six essays included here by the likes of Roger Ebert and Umberto Eco, but it’s an especial pleasure to read the truly classic film’s script and mutter the lines under one’s breath as one’s memory and imagination work side by side, with the help of “25 classic stills” included in the book, to become Bogie, or Ilsa if you will, and bring the film to life again for the thousandth time.

3-DARK CITY: THE LOST WORLD OF FILM NOIR: Eddie Muller’s now “Revised and Expanded Edition” appears on glossy paper with sharply-focused photos throughout, so the book is both a visual and tactile delight that one holds respectfully but lovingly in one’s hands. Muller, who hosts TCM’s weekly Noir Alley, is encyclopedic in his references and here he lives and breathes the idiom with an infectious writing style that sends us all, unselfconsciously, back to the forties and fifties. This is underbelly of America stuff, stylishly done, and very irresistible, whether you own a trench coat or not.

4-THE STORY OF WOMEN AND ART: If you want to explore the hollow, pretentious, cowardly, self-centred, artificial, destructive, stifling, unsportsmanlike, clueless, selfish, jealous, self-limiting, phony, spiritually-vacant, culture-killing, and pathetic (etc,etc.etc.) dominance of patriarchy in our culture, two invigoratingly passionate and scholarly-based series from historian Amanda Vickery are essential viewing: “The Story of Women and Power” and “The Story of Women and Art,” both highly-recommended, will surprise you at every turn, inform you richly, make you angry in your heart, fill you with admiring respect, and inspire you in ways you didn’t yet know about.

5-CURIOUS HISTORY OF SEX By Kate Lister This endlessly informative, perkily and energetically written, sometimes humorous and always challenging book ends with the following: “We must talk about consent, pleasure, masturbation, pornography, love, relationships and our own bodies. Because the only way we will dispel shame is to drag sex out in the open and have a good long look at it. History has shown us how damaging shaming sexual practices. in their myriad forms, can be. Let’s learn the lesson.”

Chapter titles include A History of the Cunt, A History of Virginity Tests, Medieval Impotence Tests, Sex and Cycling, Sex Work in the Ancient World, Filthy Fannies, Hair Today Gone Tomorrow and too often one learns how medical/cultural authority has been male stupidity at its egotistical and terrified worst. Images include an “Indian gouache painting of a giant penis copulating with a female devil c. 1900” and a photo titled: “Anonymous same-sex Victorian lovers enjoy a spot of cross-dressing and mutual masturbation.” Also included is a photo with the caption: “Tart cards in a British phone box in 2004.”

6-CLOTHES CLOTHES CLOTHES MUSIC MUSIC MUSIC BOYS BOYS BOYS by Viv Albertine   In the seventies, male-dominated, and virtuoso-worshipping rock scene in Britain, what better course for a female revolution than through a band called The Slits with a drummer called Paloma aka Palmolive, a guitarist and a bass player who knew almost nothing at first about their instruments, and a totally uninhibited lead singer aged fourteen about whom we read: “..halfway through the set she was dying for a piss, she didn’t want to leave the stage and couldn’t bear to be uncomfortable, so she just pulled down her leggings and knickers and pissed on the stage – all over the next band’s guitarist’s pedals as it happened – I was so impressed. No girl had pissed on the stage before, but Ari didn’t do it to be a rebel or to shock, it was much more subversive than that: she just needed a piss. In these times when girls are so uptight and secretive about their bodies and desperately trying to be ‘feminine’, she is a revolutionary.”

This hard-to-put-down, unflinchingly yet casually honest, uninhibited, and instinctively perceptive autobiographical account by guitarist Viv Albertine, friend of Sid Vicious and Johnny Rotten and tour-mate of The Clash, inspires affection and admiration as it takes us into the life of a young woman learning the ropes not only of making music but subtly of existence.

7-FIGHTING THEORY: AVITAL RONELL IN CONVERSATION WITH ANNE DUFOURMANTELLE. Translated by Catherine Porter

“According to Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, democracy in America began with a violent break, one that has haunted America ever since, because this violence (as we are seeing it today) keeps returning in a ruthless or ungovernable way. … And for Nietzsche as for Mary Shelly, America is a sort of laboratory that contains and spikes monstrosity also.” Elsewhere, Ronell says, “The hatred directed against women that comes out in the Judeo-Christian is hatred directed against the impulse to know.” …. Or try this, “I try to show that idiocy, for Wordsworth, for Rilke, for Wallace Stevens and others, is poetry itself. It is the place of extreme nonknowing, or rather the site of an absence of relation to knowledge, a place of pure reflection that nevertheless has nothing to do with philosophy or cognition.”

Ronell’s scope could be daunting as could her high-speed chase and nabbing of relevancies, but it is indeed an inspiring ride that stimulates, teases, informs, and dances with the reader’s mind. Learning doesn’t need to plod if it can fly, and Ronell’s mind certainly soars, all with a sense of humour and deep human feeling. As a result, it’s time to reread some Heidegger, Nietzsche, Derrida and and and….and read some more Ronell. Ronell comes across as instinctively hip in pulling in her densely-populated realm of ideas, and exciting as she does so. Is this book, as it challenges on every line, intimidating? Or does Ronell with her articulation of provocative ideas and connections constantly provide a reader with a freshly-watered path of seeds for the mind.
A very fulfilling experience.

Review # 2: Fighting Theory: Avital Ronell in Conversation with Anne Avital in which the former, considered by some “one of the most productive, established, and shrewd literary and cultural theorists of our time” displays a compelling ability to think and think about thinking at one go, to run simultaneous lines of thought with all sorts of references brought forth, and a compelling ability with surprising and fresh observations like “French theory exists first of all as a product of exportation from France; cheese, wine, things connected with pleasure, or ‘French kissing’…..The label French connotes pornography, or at least excessive exploration, disordered morality.” I enjoy her recall of meetings with German scholars who criticized her thus: “she’s spoiling our fun…she sees problems in the texts, everything becomes problematic with her.” But then, thinking seems to be a crime in our culture, as it used to be a sin in religion. In any case, this is a book for slow reading of its interweaving concepts and references (Heidegger, Derrida, and and) and much ensuing thought.

8-THE FILMS OF FAY WRAY BY Roy Kinnard and Tony Crnkovich

I think I was first curious about actress Fay Wray because she was born on an Alberta farm and, of course, was later famously paired with King Kong in both jungle and atop the Empire State Building. It’s strange how one becomes gradually fascinated by a porcelain-skinned screen actress, one whose eyes seem often rooted in a trance as she speaks with precise early talkies diction, and I progressed in no particular order through the following:

The Wedding March of 1928 with Erich von Stroheim; The Finger Points of 1931 – and the somewhat stilted early sound-era acting shows – based upon the murder of an idealistic reporter who took on gangsters and was killed for it; The Most Dangerous Game of 1932 with Joel McRea and Fay Wray stranded on a remote island where a madman Russian count enjoys hunting human prey – it is here we first have a leggy Wray in tattered dress and wide-eyed stare of horror; the classic King Kong of 1932 with its “notorious censored scene” of ape undressing woman and Miss Wray on all cylinders with wide-wide-eyed stares and screams at many a turn (terrific photos of all included); 1934’s Once to Every Woman with Wray as “dedicated nurse Mary Fanshawe in love with, and soon disillusioned by, that cheating Dr. Preston; the 1934 crime melodrama Woman in the Dark, with its Dashiell Hammett roots; and two personal favorites – a charming comedy, The Richest Girl in the World, with costars Miriam Hopkins and Joel McCrea, and a suspenseful The Clairvoyant in which Wray “certainly holds her own opposite Claude Rains, one of the screen’s greatest actors.” Rains is another one I’ve been checking out.

9-COMPLICATED WOMEN: SEX AND POWER IN PRE-CODE HOLLYWOOD by Mike LaSalle

It was indeed a “true Golden Age of women’s films” from 1929 to 1934, and we are told why: “Between 1929 and 1934, women in American film were modern! They took lovers, had babies out of wedlock, got rid of cheating husbands, enjoyed their sexuality, led unapologetic careers, and, in general, acted the way many think women acted after 1968…. Before then, women on screen had come in two varieties ‘good or bad – sweet ingenue or vamp. Then two stars came along and blasted away these stereotypes. Garbo turned the femme fatale into a woman whose capacity for love and sacrifice made all other human emotions seem pale. Meanwhile, Norma Shearer succeeded in taking the ingenue to a place she’d never been: the bedroom. Garbo and Shearer took the stereotypes and made them complicated.”

Of course, these two ladies were not alone – their companions soon included, to name only several, Claudette Colbert, Marlene Dietrich, Kay Francis, Jean Harlow, Miriam Hopkins, Barbara Stanwyck, Mae West – but then the “Production Code became law in Hollywood,” vigorously propelled by Joseph Breen, an avid Catholic, political reactionary, and anti-Semite who wrote, “These damn Jews are a dirty filthy lot.” In other words, Breen pulled real life and creativity, with much help, up the ass of right-wing America and the Catholic church. As a result, films in Hollywood were bound and gagged for three decades to follow. This too is a very important book.

10-FANTASYLAND: HOW AMERICA WENT HAYWIRE, A 500-YEAR STUDY by Kurt Andersen

Okay, let’s do Trump first. Author Kurt Anderson, co-founder in 1986 and, for seven years editor, of Spy magazine recalls the following concerning Donald Trump: “we devoted dozens of pages exposing and satirizing his lies, brutishness, egomania, and absurdity. Now everybody knows what we knew then. It was kind of providential that he came along just as we were creating a magazine to chronicle America’s rich and powerful jerks…. Trump’s reality was a reality show before that genre or term existed…Among the many shocking things about Trump is his irreligiosity – that our Christian party chose the candidate who was the least Christian of the lot, and that white evangelicals nonetheless approve of President Trump overwhelmingly.”

In this context in which a major country’s leader is a liar, cowardly bully, and a ridiculous and egomaniacal ass, he has, according to perverted logic, a great number of followers. They too live a reality-denying and fantasy existence “as the ultimate expression of our national character and path. America was founded by wishful dreamers, magical thinkers, and true believers, by impresarios and their audiences, by hucksters and their suckers. Believe what you want fantasy is deeply embedded in our DNA.”

This brilliantly conceived and realized book is informative, mind-opening, keenly insightful, and gripping in its detailed and intriguing narrative. It is also disturbing as hell, and after each dip into the text I need a break from this unrelenting account of a fucked-up country whose founding dreams were made of Puritanical severity, whose exploratory impetus was out and out greed, whose nobility of heart was too often racist and sexist suppression, and whose rugged individualism was self-centred and immature inability to face life as it is without hypocrisy. I’ve personally known, admired, loved even, a number of Americans who were and are special human beings. They despair of Trump, and his America, as much as the rest of us – and despair of his followers.

11-MIRIAM HOPKINS: LIFE AND FILMS OF A HOLLYWOOD REBEL by Allan R. Ellenberger

What is it about the great actresses who emerged in the thirties? A subtle feminine grandeur? A confidence of being that imbued every performance with solid but unforced presence? A blend of individual human personality and complex technical smarts that shaped every character with distinct qualities? A long-lasting impact because we can’t imagine their performances done any other way? A knack for greatness in the art of acting? The mystery of everyday womanhood?

Here are the films of Miriam Hopkins I have watched from one to ten times already and will again watch again any time anywhere. Take the dinner scene of Hopkins and Herbert Marshall in Trouble in Paradise directed with a polished sense of sexual fun and European sophistication for adults by Ernest Lubitsch – she pickpockets his watch, he her garter, and both delight in the game, and so do we. Or watch the two films in which Hopkins and her archrival Bette Davis star together – Old Acquaintance and The Old Maid – and compare how two theatrical presences emerge and hold their ground, each in competition with the other. In the former film, Davis gets to shake Hopkins quite violently and no doubt quite happily so– it’s in the script. Yet in Men Are Not Gods, Hopkins is quite touching in her compassion for an actress who is pregnant and the actor, her husband, with whom Hopkins is in love.

Or what about the two men and Hopkins of Design for Living and her believably casual final resolution – why not have both? Hopkins is quite at home in The Heiress among de Haviland, Clift and Richardson and gut-wrenching during and after the rape in The Story of Temple Drake. Do you know a sexier moment in film than when Hopkins as the “sluttish” Champaigne Ivy sits naked and sheet-covered on a bed and dangling her naked leg to tempt Dr Jekyll to “come back soon?”

Perhaps Hopkins was “one of the most difficult stars in Hollywood” but she was also gifted and admirably gutsy in taking charge of her film and stage careers. She had intellectuals Dreiser, Parker, and Stein as friends and had “a close and enduring friendship with Tennessee Williams.” In The Richest Girl in the World, the scene where Hopkins realizes she is coming to love Joel McCrea is a lesson in reaction acting with Hopkins doing a whole palette of expressions – I’ve watched this scene several dozen times. And I recommend this book about an underrated and overlooked major actress.

12-EARLY RECORDINGS AND MUSICAL STYLE; changing tastes in instrumental performance 1900-1950 by Robert Philip

Author Robert Philip spells out his purpose at the outset: “Recordings show how performance has gradually changed from the early twentieth century to our own time”. and we can witness how “performing styles can be seen as remnants of nineteenth century style.” “They demonstrate how the practices of the late twentieth century, including those we take entirely for granted, have evolved. The greatest value of this is that it forces us to question unspoken assumptions about modern taste, and about the ways in which we use it to justify our interpretations of earlier performance practice.”

The recordings of the early twentieth century are the link between two eras and they provide a “valuable key to understanding both the development of modern performance practice, and the practices of earlier centuries,” Philip also points out. One of the themes running through this book is that “musicians do not necessarily do what they say” … “and that in many cases it would be impossible to deduce everyday features of performance without the recordings” Philip takes us through quite detailed comparisons and discussions in chapters titled, for example, Flexibility of Tempo, String Vibrato, Orchestral Portamento, Tempo Rubato, and Long and Short Notes.

Be warned that you’ll inevitably compile a list of performances you have to hear, really hear. I am so tempted by this passage: “On recordings, the contrast between the old and the new school is very vivid. Sometimes the two styles can be heard side by side, for example in the famous recording of J. S. Bach’s Concerto for Two Violins made in 1915 by Kreisler and Zimbalist. This shows very clearly the difference between Kreisler’s continuous vibrato, which was unusual at that date, and Zimbalist’s traditional, more sparing use of it…”

Review # 2- No doubt you have often wondered, “What is the relationship between performance and recording? How are modern audiences affected by the trends set in motion by the recording era? What is the impact of recordings on the lives of musicians?” Happily, ROBERT PHILIP – a lecturer, music critic, broadcaster, writer, and performer – has also had these questions in mind and he breaks new historical and aesthetic ground in his PERFORMING MUSIC IN THE AGE OF RECORDING. Often, we can only piece together a hypothetical take on the styles of Brahms, Liszt, Chopin, and everyone else in the 19th century, but Philip makes such exploration a music-lover’s adventure, especially since we might not have recordings of a composer playing but we do have a student of a student of the composer in question on old 78s. And to think that Philip’s idea of doing research by listening was first met with academic disdain!

13-BEETHOVEN’S CONVERSATION BOOKS VOLUME 1 NOS. 1 TO 8 (FEBRUARY TO MARCH 1820 Edited and Translated by Theodore Albrecht

Beethoven lovers rejoice! A few months ago, this announcement grabbed my attention: “A complete new edition of Beethoven’s conversation books, now translated into English in their entirety for the first time. Covering a period associated with the revolutionary style of what we call “late Beethoven”, these often lively and compelling conversations are now finally accessible in English for the scholar and Beethoven-lover.”

Beethoven had increasing deafness from around 1798 and by 1818, he’d begun “carrying blank booklets with him, for his acquaintances to jot their sides of conversations, while he answered aloud. Often, he himself used the pocket-sized booklets to make shopping lists and other reminders, including occasional early sketches for his compositions. Today, 139 of these booklets survive, covering the years 1818 up to the composer’s death in 1827 and including such topics as music, history, politics, art, literature, theatre, religion, and education as perceived on a day-to-day basis in post-Napoleonic Europe.”

I’m now reading “February 1818 to March 1820” which means having a huge number of “new footnotes exclusive to this edition and brand-new introductions” in support of comments written by a variety of individuals who chatted and dined and drank with Beethoven. We don’t learn much of Beethoven’s own thinking, since the books usually contain questions and responses of Beethoven’s company at the time and not Beethoven’s own verbal comments and responses.

The editor has much to deal with, from, say, the self-serving forging of entries of Schindler, Beethoven’s occasional friend/secretary, to even the changing of numbering system on Vienna’s streets, to passing indications – perhaps – of Beethoven’s being commissioned to compose the Missa Solemnis. Let’s face it, these books, chaotic and mysterious as they can be on each page, do suggest fascinating aspects of the day-to-day life of a great composer. What did Beethoven say to evoke a specific comment, one often wonders, and one is gradually drawn, in countless fragments of conversation, into the world of a great creative spirit and mind.

14-THE UNINHABITABLE EARTH by David Wallace-Wells: The earth’s dire future, predicted – and far too much ignored or denied – not too long ago, is now our daily horrifying present tense, one which Wallace-Wells thoroughly details in chapters like Heat Death, Hunger, Dying Oceans, Unbreathable Air, and Economic Collapse. And, of course I still read just recently another smug and arrogant right-wing denier on the editorial page of Britain’s The Daily Telegraph. And like many others I do become angry whenever it is obvious that the fate of the world and all life forms are at the mercy of childishly egotistical and indifferent leaders and their followers who live only to look the other way.

15- THE POEMS OF CATULLUS: A BILINGUAL EDITION Translated with Commentary by Peter Green may have its critics among classicists regarding translation of specific words or cultural accuracy or even among poets regarding meter and awareness of poetic methods, but this edition does offer the appeal of an energetic personality with an assertive, sometimes confrontational, attitude that makes for a compelling read. Try #16 opening with “Up yours both, and sucks to the pair of you.” There is much here that arouses delight, and who knows what else?

16-I once interviewed author John Banville, a man who spontaneously answered my many questions, including those about writing, in beautifully constructed paragraphs. So, I read his TIME PIECES: A DUBLIN MEMOIR very slowly, surely with the intent to savour his quietly delicious and subtly moving writing. Also, to take in his connection to memory, time, cultural detail, and all else in one’s life that walks a fine line between remembering and reconstructing the past. “Dublin was never my Dublin, which made it all the more alluring. I was born in Wexford…” he begins, and later continues, “December days in the approach to Christmas are short, and end with a sense of soft collapse.” And he later exclaims, “Oh to be unhappy in the arms of Monica Vitti!” when first seeing L’Avventura. Oh, yes, agreed, give me some of that unhappiness!

17-Talking of delicious, the back cover of PEGGY TO HER PLAYWRIGHTS: THE LETTERS OF MARGARET RAMSEY, PLAY AGENT WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY SIMON CALLOW offers the following passage to David Hare from Ms Ramsey, a woman devoted to theatre and writing of the highest standards and writers of the highest integrity: “Fuck the critics. They’ve all compromised or sold out. They are failures. Along comes a shining child of twenty-six and tells them what’s wrong with them. They aren’t big enough to take the blows.” This book is an informed, opinionated, and exciting ride inside the real world of theatrical creativity and politics. Ramsey is a thorough pleasure to read and – why not? – perhaps emulate.

18-Whenever I weary of the ever-present denial of life’s hard realities posing as ‘positive thinking’ or ‘religion’ or ‘spirituality,’ I take an audio recording of BARBARA EHRENREICH’S BRIGHT-SIDED: HOW POSITIVE THINKING IS UNDERMINING AMERICA’ for another listen in the car, and find myself again applauding how this sharply-honed and ‘take no BS writer’ takes on both religious hypocrites and opportunistic new age gurus who make a good buck from the – take your pick – helplessness, gullibility, stupidity, or hopelessness of their followers. Her next book is Natural Causes: An Epidemic of Wellness, The Certainty of Dying, and Killing Ourselves to Live Longer, which, like the first, I’ve read, listened to, and thanked from the bottom of my sanity.

19-ELIZABETH VIGÉE LE BRUN: THE ODYSSEY OF AN ARTIST IN AN AGE OF REVOLUTION tells the story of an artist who has become a personal favorite, and I’m not alone in my high regard since Joshua Reynolds himself esteemed her higher than Van Dyck. I once flipped out over her technical mastery and depiction of character in her Self-portrait in a Straw Hat in London’s National Gallery where I later declared to the bookstore custodian – with her ensuing startled look – that the artist had the most kissable lips in town. Being Marie Antoinette’s favorite portraitist, Vigée le Brun had to quickly depart Paris after 1789, for travels in Italy, Austria, Russia, and England, during which both her clientele and her fame grew. This fascinating but discreet biography is as informed as possible, with sympathetic reference to the artist’s autobiography, and written in the somewhat guarded enthusiasm of academic prose.

20-The closest I ever got to The Band was through interviewing Garth Hudson some years ago in 2005. Recently, I have been deep-diving again into the one-of-a-kind and richly-realized music of The Band and, to support my listening to ten of their albums (okay, one is by a solo Rick Danko), have read two meticulously researched, consistently informative, sometimes eye-opening books: THE BAND: PIONEERS OF AMERICANA MUSIC BY CRAIG HARRIS AND THE BAND FAQ: ALL THAT’S LEFT TO KNOW ABOUT THE FATHERS OF AMERICANA. The Harris book grabbed me early with its reference to If I Had a Hammer, originally The Hammer Song by The Weavers on the Hootenanny label (a 78-rpm recording I once owned). The FAQ chapter on clubs connected to The Band – or Ronnie Hawkins, actually – took me down memory lane of Toronto’s Le Coq d’Or, Warwick Hotel, Friar’s Tavern, Edison Hotel, Steele’s Tavern (yep, I heard Gordon Lightfoot there), Embassy Club, and Hamilton’s Golden Rail and Grange Tavern (there was one other where Hamilton Place was later built – name???). Both books are good reads full of information and certainly make one appreciate The Band even more.

21-FROM REVERENCE TO RAPE: THE TREATMENT OF WOMEN IN THE MOVIES (from 1974 and now revised and reissued in 1987) by film critic MOLLY HASKELL takes an encyclopedic, feminist, acutely perceptive, insightfully critical, and ground-breaking look at the images of woman in film right from cinema’s beginnings. Haskell has a discerning mind and an evocative and razor-sharp writing style to match, so her take on women in cinema is always thought-provoking and challenging as she explores, say, the three types of women characters who appear in the woman’s film – the extraordinary woman, the ordinary woman, and ordinary woman who becomes extraordinary – and considers factors in a film woman’s life like the sacrifices she must make or the afflictions she endures or the choices on her plate or competition with other women. We rethink a great deal because of Haskell, say, about the misrepresentation of Doris Day as a professional virgin. Haskell is right on about Jeanne Moreau, Ingmar Bergman, Catherine Deneuve, and Francois Truffaut who “cannot, does not. lead innocence over the divide into experience.” Much here for both women and men to think about.

22-WOMEN WHO READ ARE DANGEROUS BY STEFAN BOLLMAN contains this passage: “Reading now meant identifying with the emotions of another as expressed on paper, and thereby exploring and expanding the horizons of one’s emotional potential.” In other words, women who enter the worlds of worthy authors, enter with their imaginations and minds beyond the immediate control of the patriarchal cultures in which they live. They can learn more of life in the world and thumb a ride on the trajectories of their independent thoughts. Each painting in this beautiful collection of often new discoveries faces a sympathetic and often poetic description, but what often strikes the reader is the intense concentration and unviolated privacy of the depicted reader. Each painting is a world unto itself and we must give of ourselves to enter it.

23-Yasujiro Ozu is considered by the Japanese to be “the most Japanese of all their directors” says DONALD RITCHIE in his full-length critical work on the director, OZU, has its sections titled Introduction, Script, Shooting, Editing, Conclusion, plus a very detailed Biographical Filmography. I’ve been under Ozu’s spell for a long time via Criterion Collection prints of his late in career but sometimes very early in career films, been under the spell of one of his stars, the mysteriously radiant Setsuko Hara (even bought a book of her film photographs from Japan and, yep, it was in Japanese). But it’s hard not to treasure Ozu’s ability to stress subtly the profundities of day-to-day life, to present light brush stroke insights into human psychology and behavior, to imply so much by nuance. Ozu loved his sake, lots of it especially when working on shooting scripts, and, unmarried, he lived with his mother until her death, and he shows us so much about people and about ourselves with his usually knee-high camera angle and loads of spiritual and directorial artistry that we slowly come to understand.

24-Another essential book on Shakespeare? I used to have six or seven such books which felt fresh with each re-connection, and I’m adding THIS IS SHAKESPEARE by EMMA SMITH to that list of reference pleasures. How can one resist a book that begins, in the Introduction, with “Lots of what we trot out about Shakespeare…? blah blah blah is just not true, and just not important.” Whatever your take on Shakespeare, this book will challenge it and enlighten you with fresh perspectives on his plays. After reading Smith on Coriolanus, 1 Henry IV, Twelfth Night, and The Tempest, I already reread the sixteen-page chapter on Coriolanus again, just to enjoy her inventive and informed perspective, her seductively fresh and undeniable writing style, her passionate commitment to Shakespeare as a master of theatricality and theatrical meanings, and her ability to communicate and celebrate the playwright’s “gappy” quality. Smith maintains “Gappiness is Shakespeare’s dominant and defining characteristic. And ambiguity is the oxygen of these works…”

25-SCOTT YANOW has, for over thirty years, written for every key jazz magazine around, from DownBeat to Coda, and I’ve long heeded his reviews in the All Music Guide to Jazz. He is thoroughly-brewed in both his love and knowledge of jazz; he is balanced, giving but firm, and engagingly passionate in his assessments; he has a knack for placing crucial historical and biographical facts; and yes, he is a pleasure to read. In his appropriately titled THE JAZZ SINGERS: THE ULTIMATE GUIDE, published by Backbeat Books, Yanow provides profiles of over 500 vocalists in the idiom from the likes of Ma Rainey, Bessie Smith and Jelly Roll Morton up to the freshly-minted breed of today that includes Diana Krall and Cassandra Wilson. You’ll find here many lesser known but worthy vocalists, recommended recordings, often websites of the singers, and chapters titled “198 Other Jazz Singers of Today,”55 Others Who Have Also Sung Jazz,” “30 Jazz Vocal Groups,” and a listing of suggested DVDs. One reason, I’ll read and re-read this Guide is for a fresh take on the singers; for example, I’ve known swing and classic jazz singer Alex Pangman for some years and still learned new stuff from Yanow’s entry on Alex.

26-SHAKESPEARE FOR THE PEOPLE: WORKING-CLASS READERS 1800-1900, published by Cambridge University Press, is a compelling study that is rich with humanity, partly because author Andrew Murphy uses as his resource more than a hundred fascinating autobiographical texts, from the era, in either published and manuscript form. Thus, we discover the profound connection between bard and working-class readership, with special focus upon radical readers “for whom Shakespeare’s work had a special political resonance.” We also learn how access to cheaper editions and public elementary education in Britain developed over the nineteenth century and how, in time, Shakespeare became “annexed” by an academic elite while the working class also turned instead to “mass-circulation newspapers or fiction.” We meet numerous individuals in this intriguing study, like Betsy Cadwaladyr who worked as a servant, ship steward, and nurse in the Crimean War with Florence Nightingale, all the while a diligent reader –and actor- of Shakespeare.

27-Because I did my M.A. at U of T, even before some of the buildings discussed herein were built, LARRY WAYNE RICHARDS’ handsomely produced UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO: AN ARCHITECTURAL TOUR from Princeton Architectural Press brings many memories of decades ago to vivid recollection, especially because Tom Arban’s stunning photographs are both bold and mysterious at one time and Richards’ text well serves both historical and guidebook ends. More than 170 buildings from all three campuses –St. George, Scarborough, and Mississauga- are featured, and one can read the background of, say, University College of 1858, Hart House of 1919, Massey College of 1963, and even the Royal Ontario Museum with photographs from both 1914 when it opened and today when it went wild on Bloor Street in architect Daniel Libeskind’s hands.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment