ALAN LUCIEN ØYEN: “THE MOST POWERFUL THING IS TO BE ABLE TO BE QUIET TOGETHER” SAYS CELEBRATED NORWEGIAN WRITER, DIRECTOR, CHOREOGRAPHER FROM HARBOURFRONT DURING RUN OF “STORY, STORY, DIE” …. A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about one or more projects that you have been working on or have recently completed. Why exactly do they matter to you and why should they matter to others?

ALAN LUCIEN ØYEN: All my work is created in response to “now”. I find inspiration everywhere around me. So, the times we live in are bound to influence the work. I always start with dialogue and creative exchange through dialogue with the cast I’m working with. With the work we’re currently touring in Canada, Story, story, die. our starting point was the concept of “staging” – how we fictionalize our everyday life in when we exchange with other people. The theatricality of producing vignettes and trailers from our lives is particularly terrifying on social media, but I think it has to do with something innately human. We are story tellers. But the concept of acceleration and dialogue that is becoming noise, because we are responding to each other with no wait/process time is scary and something that greatly influenced the work. I hope and think this make it relevant to our audiences today.

JS: How did doing these projects change you as a person and as a creator?

ALO: I don’t think it’s possible to trace change. It happens slowly constantly. Sure, my work affects me and changes within me, but no more or less than life itself. The past 15 years life and work has been the same and it constantly changes me and itself. Hopefully it’s evolution. I try to learn from every encounter I make.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate about the work you produce or do?

ALO: I hope very little(!)

I consider performing art a true social project, in terms that it comes about through exchange between a big group of people working tighter, (as opposed to writing or painting, which is an activity that can happen alone). Equally I believe I dialogue with the audience. If there is no dialogue, or if the work does not communicate, I have failed as an artist and a creator. Accessibility to the work is therefore very much at the forefront of my creative processes.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

ALO: Listening. My mother says, we have two ears and one mouth. Observation is key. I am an emotional person and also a believer in dialogue. I try to create emotional work that is somehow eager to engage with the audience, this is probably because of how I am as a person.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

ALO: To create. On the spot. I once read that to create a Japanese Haiku poem – in addition to the specific rules – there were “rules” that said the poem should “come from a happy place” and that the work should “feel easy.” I try to live by this. A challenge is always setting up the parameters for such creation in a pressurized environment. But I aim to and try to.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire because of their work in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

ALO: I think the most powerful thing is to be able to be quiet together. It’s difficult and exciting and when that is true and there is understanding through silence that’s very powerful. I’d love to sit quietly with Pina Bausch, Ingmar Bergman and Nina Simone.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

ALO: I can’t recall. I find everything in life influences me, whether I like it or not/am aware or not.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

ALO: I sometimes get “what do you do in the daytime?” That’s a hopeless conversation.

“How do you remember all the words?” – That is not so magical to me, as there is logic to words.

“How do you remember all the movements?” – This really IS magic to me, because it’s all abstract.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted as yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

ALO: I say my works on the stage are poor excuses for not making films. I will eventually get round to it. I’ve been given too many opportunities that I would have had to pass up on to pursue film, so I’ve waited. I think / hope the exchange from theatre will help me make the films I’d like to make.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

ALO: Maybe be more ballsy. I know so much about life in the arts is a game of opportunities. And I’m feeling very grateful for all that I have been allowed to be a part of without actively raising my hand. But what if I hadn’t been afraid to raise my hand?

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

ALO: I’m greatly inspired by the fact that people are willing to sit down in person and listen to other people’s thoughts/ideas/problems and solutions. I think that’s powerful and what is needed in real life.

I’m terrified by the internet and the speed of which it’s changing us and the world we live in. It facilitates for some much beauty, but at such a cost. We get it all immediately now, yes. But we’ve lost waiting, for instance. And we’re burning our candle from both ends.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create and/or do?

ALO: The fact that I get to exchange with other people through both the process and the presentation of the work. The be given the power to suggest ideas to the world is an honor.

JS: In your creative life thus far, what have been the most helpful comments you have heard about your work?

ALO: I can’t recall.

JS: Finally, what do you yourself find to be the most intriguing and/or surprising things about you?

ALO: Intriguing and surprising are words I can’t use to describe myself. If they apply at all someone else has to be the judge of.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

DANIEL CARTER, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS + PROGRAMMING OF TORONTO’S BUDDIES IN BAD TIMES THEATRE, ON THE NEW NATIONAL QUEER AND TRANS PLAYWRITING UNIT AND THE IMPORTANCE OF DIVERSE VOICES TO BE HEARD WITHIN THE ARTS…. A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

See the source image

 

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about the recently launched Unit. Why exactly does it matter to you and why should it matter to us?

DANIEL CARTER: The National Queer and Trans Playwriting Unit is a new initiative that aims to support playwrights creating new queer performance works. The idea was originally conceived by ZeeZee Theatre who brought together companies from across Canada – some with queer specific mandates, some without – with the aim of supporting five playwrights financially and artistically as they develop their work. The unit will conclude with a public reading of their work, and a commitment of further development and/or production of the work by the consortium of companies.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate in the work you produce or do?

DC: A lot of the work that Buddies produces comes out of our Residency Program, which is focused on deep and long-term development. The projects seen on stage spend anywhere between 3 to 5…sometimes 7 years in development, often moving through several iterations before being publicly presented. What you see on stage is really 10% of the work, whereas the other 90% is the collaborative process of creation and experimentation…and lots of meetings, emails and grant writing.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

DC: I love questions. I love bad ideas. I love exquisite pressure. I think these are all quite generative in a (creative) process. And I think I try to bring this to the work I do as a collaborator, producer, and administrator.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

DC: Tough question. My impulse was to say time to be creative. But I think there is a lot of space to be creative in the day-to-day of my role. However, when I recall freelancing and working contract positions – having more of a portfolio career – money and regular income was a consistent challenge. This is one of the reasons why I’m very excited about the Queer and Trans Playwriting Unit – the financial resources it offers to artists, so they can actually afford time and space to focus on creation, is really wonderful, and hopefully provides some sense of security.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

DC: Stay focused. Hustle. And take time to rest!

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

DC: I think my time spent at Factory Theatre in one of their new work development programs was very grounding for me as an early-career artist and having just returned to Toronto. Factory was my first “Yes” in Toronto theatre after a long list of “Nos.” (Also any time spent around Nina is time well spent. She’s just incredibly insightful, caring yet no-nonsense, and honestly just cool.)

What’s wonderful about these units are the connections and relationships built with new collaborators and new mentors, and I hope the artists who are invited into the National Queer and Trans Playwrights Unit share a similar experience. I think the networks and communities that can be shared by the ten theatre companies with the incoming artists is really thrilling and hopefully creates relationships that help to support and further the development of these new works.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

DC: It can be pretty consuming. Maybe that’s just me – but I don’t think so. Whether you’re working on a project or within a company, I think that arts work is “sticky” in the sense that it stays with you. After you leave the office, close your computer, leave the rehearsal hall – thoughts, ideas, questions pop up and percolate. I find, for myself, it’s sometimes difficult to ignore those things as they arise or pin them for later for when I’m “back at work.” This was especially true throughout the pandemic when I lived/worked in the same space – that physical line between personal life and work life became a lot more blurry. Looking at the Unit, and the layers of structure and support that are built into its foundation (i.e., dramaturgical sessions, one-on-one mentors, working with the consortium of theatres), I feel as though there is a lot of space to build a working model that allows for the balance between work and life.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

DC: Great question, but honestly after the past two years of constant pivots and adapting, I just want to do a good old fashioned staged reading of something.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

DC: I think I’d want to be a bit more bold. I remember sitting in a bit of an info session with someone from Playwrights Guild of Canada, and the person leading it shared something that I echo to anyone who would listen, which is: just apply for that thing; a group of people are going to read your work, read about who you are and what you’re interested in, even if you don’t get that thing (award, residency, acceptance to a program) there is now a group of people who know who you are, who know about your work, and can keep you in mind for future opportunities. And I would definitely echo that sentiment for those thinking about applying to this newly launched Unit.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

DC: I think a lot of important conversations are happening around arts policy, equitable work, and working models, and seeing small shifts that have the ability to lead to larger shifts is very exciting. It feels as though there’s an openness to experiment, alongside a fearlessness to inquire and interrogate, which I think is a wonderful pairing for changemaking.

I’ve worked with a lot of early-career artists so far in my work, and seeing how they prioritize health and safety, care, and equitable payment – and really at the end of the day: people – is, I think, a strong indicator of the direction the arts sector is heading. And so, I’m hopeful that a sustainable future (through an environmental lens, financial lens, and human resources lens) is on the horizon.

JS: If you yourself were a critic of the arts discussing your work, be it something specific or in general, what would you say?

DC: I think any company that is queer mandated and strives to serve a community as expansive as our queer communities is a huge undertaking. It needs a one size fits one approach when working with communities. Sometimes we do it successfully, sometimes not. But looking back on this year, seeing our digital/hybrid/in-person programming, how we’ve been centring artists and their process, and making adjustments to our ways of working, is all really wonderful.

JS: Finally, what do you yourself find to be the most intriguing and/or surprising things about you?

DC: Oh, I’m such a boring person…but I have a black belt in kung fu!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BARBARA KANERATONNI DIABO ON HER DANCE PRODUCTION SKY DANCERS, – THE STORY OF 33 MOHAWK IRONWORKERS WHO LOST THEIR LIVES IN THE QUEBEC BRIDGE COLLAPSE OF 1907 – EXPLAINS “I PUT MY LOVE, MY PAIN, MY HEART, MY TIME, MY BODY, AND MY SPIRIT INTO THIS PIECE” ….AT HARBOURFRONT’S FLECK THEATRE ON MAY 20-22ND, 2022…. A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about one or more projects that you have been working on or have recently completed or are upcoming (Sky Dancers). Why exactly do they matter to you and why should they matter to us?

BARBARA KANERATONNI DIABO: Indigenous arts have been discouraged, hidden, ignored, or even illegal for so long, it is important for everyone to support Indigenous arts now. It is important for everyone to respect and know the stories of this land and its first peoples who are still here.

Sky Dancers is my latest completed dance production that will next be shown at Harbourfront Fleck Theatre on May 20-22nd, 2022. It is a true story that is important to me personally, my community of Kahnawake, and as I have learned, becomes important to everyone who learns about it. It is the story of the 33 Mohawk ironworkers who lost their lives when the Quebec Bridge collapsed in 1907 while under construction, as well as the stories of their families and the community. This disaster was a huge event in the engineering world, Canada, and of course, my community of Kahnawake, where these ironworkers lived.

My great-grandfather was one of the ironworkers who died on the bridge that day. This production is important to me because it has affected my family and many others in my community. Researching and creating this show has brought a better understanding about my roots and my present. I believe that this story will bring better understandings to all about Indigenous people, their contributions, their challenges, and their resilience. It has universal elements in it that all people can understand about loss, tragedy, and family.

Of course, I have other projects in the works, but more to come on that another time!

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate in the work you produce or do?

BKD: I created this work so it could be understood by anyone – dance fans, people who never watch dance, Indigenous, non-Indigenous, etc. We use many elements, such as video, storytelling, lights, an elaborate set, and dance to create a full story. Certain small things that come from our culture – certain dances, songs – may not be fully understood, but I believe are still appealing to all.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

BKD: That’s a tough question! It touches on some delicate subjects, such as death, loss, and residential school, so of course there were times when I felt vulnerable or triggered. But the importance of telling this story overrode that and helped me find the courage to keep going. I put my love, my pain, my heart, my time, my body, and my spirit into this piece.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

BKD:  It varies. Unpeeling through the layers of ideas to find the “right” clarity in a project to share. Trusting the creative process even in the “low” or challenging moments. Trying to convince some people of the great importance of arts. And of course, balancing organizational challenges, such as scheduling, funding, and other logistics with the creation process in the studio.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

BKD: I would say: Hi! I love your work. Thank you for being inspiring!

You would have to ask them for their answer…but maybe they would say “thanks”!

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

BKD: Hmmm…I feel every day that new things, events, and people influence me in my life. But if I had to choose…

1- Moving back to Montreal (from Nova Scotia) and teaching high school in my community of Kahnawake (right beside Montreal). It helped me re-connect with my community and learn more about my culture, when before I did not have as much access to it because I grew up away from it much of my life.

2- Going to the Native Theatre School in Ontario (which later became the Centre for Indigenous Theatre). It was the first time that I was in an environment that allowed me to connect and explore my culture with my art.

3- Becoming a mother. Priorities change and your heart grows!

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

BKD: Sometimes people seem to see artists as less important in society. That artists are less intelligent than those in science, for example. There can be great intelligence in all sectors.

Also, some people don’t realize how much work and time is put into one performance.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

BKD: I would like to tour more internationally. When I became more ready for this, that’s when COVID hit.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

BKD: I am not sure how to answer that – I am who I am today because of everything I have lived. And I like me!

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

BKD: What gives me hope is that it seems that organizations seem to be making more real commitments and actions to support Indigenous arts.

What sometimes brings me down is that some of these conversations have been already been going on for so many years – are we making change or is history just repeating? There is still a lot of work to do…it extends way beyond just the arts.

JS: If you yourself were a critic of the arts discussing your work, be it something specific or in general, what would you say?

BKD: Ha ha – next question.

JS: Finally, what do you yourself find to be the most intriguing and/or surprising things about you?

BKD: I am always curious and love learning. I often say that I feel like an eternal beginner. I still take dance classes in new styles that I don’t know. I will never learn everything that I want to before I die.

…oh yeah – and I am an absolute science-fiction geek! I think many people don’t expect that of me!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

CANADIAN DANCE ARTIST ANNE PLAMONDON IN HARBOURFRONT CENTRE CHOREOGRAPHIC DEBUT WITH “ONLY YOU” – VULNERABILITY AND ACCEPTANCE DANCED IN DUET ..…A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about one or more projects that you have been working on or have recently completed. Why exactly do they matter to you and why should they matter to us?

ANNE PLAMONDON: Last fall, I choreographed on the production Vanishing Mélodies of BJM. A dance and theater show with the music of Patrick Watson. I also worked with the students of Arts Umbrella school in Vancouver last January. Both of these projects give me the opportunity to develop my practice and my work, as well as encouraging the transmission of our discipline to the next generation.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate in the work you produce or do?

AP: This is an interesting question. I never think about that.

When I make work, I don’t worry about what others will not appreciate. I prefer to focus on the things that they might appreciate or relate to, and find a compelling way to share it through dance.  I focus on things that matter to me, such as creating movement that is interesting, intriguing or mysterious. I also wish to address issues that touch me personally, hoping it reaches other people’s hearts as well.

I also take the creative process very seriously. I believe in the power of getting together to make something. And how rich the energy of a group of dancers and collaborators can be.

I am fully aware that my work might not please everyone, and I admit, it is not always easy to accept. But I know that making stuff is partly my doing, my conscious decisions, my abilities etc…And another part is more mysterious and holistic somehow.

There is a pretty big part of intuition in my process.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

AP: I would say…my dance background, my influences, are important parts of myself that I put into my work. Every day, I come with everything I got. All my abilities, knowledge and my experiences as a performance for 25 years. All the people I learned from too.

My work is defined by my history as a dancer and as a person. I bring all of that into the studio. Even my fears and doubts. And my bravery. At least, that’s what I try to do every day.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

AP: The challenges are also what makes my job a very exciting one. It is not a routine. My agenda varies constantly, which makes it a bit complicated when you have a family.

I can never rely on my past successes. I am an endless student, and I must continue to be curious about everything in life.

There is also a certain amount of uncertainty that comes with creation, that I have to be ok with. Every creation has a different process. I have to stay open and flexible, in order to find its hidden treasures.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

AP: I’ve been very fortunate to learn from brilliant artists in my career. Some I had the chance to say thank you. Others not. Some, I was too young to recognize the chance I had to learn from them.

So, I would say thank you.

And I hope they would say “I always believed in you”.

The ones I admire from a distance but never had the chance to meet. Uhm… I guess I would engage in a conversation about art and its role in the world.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

AP: There’s been a few turning points, but becoming a mother was a major pivotal event. In all the most positive ways.

My daughter brought a lot of meaning and balance to my life. Dancing and creating is now more of a playground for curiosity, self-accomplishment and giving back.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

AP: This one is hard to respond to because I cannot speak for others. But I can speak from experience. The kind of misunderstanding I witness sometimes, is the fact that what I dois actually a real job. It is hard to believe, but there is still a misunderstanding about that. Sometimes, people don’t understand the amount of commitment required to develop and thrive as a dance artist.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

AP: I have a lot of faith in the dance evolution and its capacity to engage an audience, a reflection, and provoke change. Movement is a universal language that brings people together, in thoughts and emotions.  In this time where we need connection more than ever, I believe dance can help healing lots of our traumas.

See the source image

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A TRIBUTE POEM TO MY UKRAINIAN UNCLE WASYL, FROM 1984

BACKGROUND: My mother’s mother and her uncle, born Wasyl and later called Charlie, were born in Ukraine. I loved both very deeply and, with limited facility, would speak Ukrainian as a child to each one. When Charlie died, I wrote this poem and it became the first of my poems to appear in a literary journal (Fiddlehead) and then in my first book of poetry (Bones to Bury). I’m sure that you can understand why, in these days of Putin’s acts of genocide, that I am posting this tribute to a gentle and kind Ukrainian man.

WASYL SZEWCZYK

 by James Strecker (c) 1984

This method I learned

from Charlie:

After the meal

wash your bowl and spoon.

Let them dry

on the counter

until you eat again.

Be patient.

He was a bachelor.

In his seventh decade

they brought women,

like weather-beaten cattle,

to the timid man’s home

for him to take in

marriage. He rejected

the sagging Polish

widows and their matchmade

schemes for his land.

He left the house and garden

in a will. There was little

else: four boxes of novels

describing sophisticated

bachelors and accessible blondes,

and a handful of age-ruined

photographs, the girl

beautiful in 1921.

Had he loved her?

He wanted to nod his head yes,

but couldn’t.

He left an epithet, Charlie,

a handy anglicized substitute

for the alien Wasyl.

We removed two kinds of shirts

from his room: white shirts

covered with cellophane, then

dust (these should not be spoiled

too soon by common labourer’s

use) and others laden with sweat,

odors of work eating the fibres.

He wasted nothing, not even

his life.

Wasyl Szewczyk is dead,

Wasyl Szewczyk of Galicia,

a Ukrainian serf from a feudal

age who despised the priest

and his landowner’s god.

He had seen a pregnant girl

beaten by holy fists, had

fled to a dirty coal mining

town, a fourteen hour shift,

and wept from the pain

of his burned, bandaged hands.

His fingers learned to play

the clarinet, cut hair

with a barber’s expertise,

hold a book of Shevchenko’s

poetry. He was attuned, like

spring, to the delicacy

of creation.

At meals, he belched with

thanks, a peasant.

He lies buried in Beausejour,

Manitoba where he once pastured

cows, and his hair was black

as a rain-soaked prairie field.

Wasyl Szewczyk is dead.

There was little to say after him.

We lacked his wit, was it peasant

or Slavic, that taunted death

as a nuisance and friend.

He knew the dead to be lucky.

What aspect knows the man?

He posed unsmiling for photographs.

He lived a long life,

should have hated the world.

He wore a suit on Sundays.

Charlie Szewcyzk, the farmer

Wasyl, died last April

in his eightieth year.

At seventy-five

he had learned to play

the violin.

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BOOKS YOU MUST READ: 32 plus 27 RECOMMENDED BOOKS

RECOMMENDED BOOKS 32 plus 27

These are some of the books I’ve read or re-read or have kept dipping into over the last few years. The few I’ve disliked shall remain absent and anonymous, but the titles in the following two lists have so very much to offer, that I ask you to check them out.

 The 27 books in LIST #2 include comments about them from my previous blogs. For the 32 books in LIST #1, about which I have no comments for now, I suggest you Google them and read about them until you feel you cannot live without them.

LIST # 1

1–Sad Little Men: Private Schools and the Ruin of England by Richard Beard

2–Piano Notes by Charles Rosen

3–Encounter by Milam Kundera

4–Venice by Marie-Jose Gransard

5–Solitude by Anthony Storr

6–Felice by Georges Simenon

7–The Blue Room by Georges Simenon

8–A Maigret Christmas and Other Stories by Georges Simenon

9–The Rough Guide to Punk by Al Spicer

10–Hollywood Lesbians: From Garbo to Foster by Boze Hadleigh

11–The Indispensable Composers: A Personal Guide by Anthony Tommasini

12–Great Philosophers Who Failed at Love by Andrew Shaffer

13–Legendary Voices Volumes 1 & 2 by Nigel Douglas

14-The Art of Reading: An Illustrated History of Books in Print by Jamie Camplin & Maria Ranauro

15-Carringtons Letters, Dora Carrington: Her Art, Her Loves, Her Friendships Edited by Anne Chisholm

16-The Globe Guide to Shakespeare: The Plays, The Productions, The Life

17-The Annotated Big Sleep by Raymond Chandler

18-A Writer’s Notebook by W. Somerset Maugham

19-The Politics of Experience by R. D. Laing

20- Love Letters Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville-West

21-The Seagull Anton Chekhov Translated by Nelson, Pevear, Volokhonsky

22- Eminent Victorians: The Illustrated Edition by Lytton Strachey

23-Six Poets Hardy to Larkin: An Anthology by Alan Bennett

24- The Anchor Anthology of French Poetry from Nerval to Valery

25-Poirot and Me by David Suchet

26-The Essential Neruda: Selected Poems

27-The Complete Poems of Anne Akhmatova trans by Judith Hemschemeyer

28-Music in Art by Ausoni

29-Artists’ Techniques and Materials by Antonella Fuga

30-Love and the Erotic in Art by Stefano Zuffi

31-The Complete Kobzar: The Poetry of Taras Shevchenko trans Peter Fedynsky

32-W. H. Auden: Selected Poems

 

LIST #2 

1- If You Should Fail by Joe Moran

2-Casablanca: Script and Legend

3-Dark City: The Lost World of Film Noir by Eddie Mueller

4-The Story of Women and Art

5-Curious History of Sex by Kate Lister

6-Clothes Clothes Clothes Music Music Music Boys Boys Boys by Viv Albertine  

7-Fighting Theory: Avital Ronell in Conversation with Anne Dufourmantelle. Translated by Catherine Porter

8-The Films of Fay Wray by Roy Kinnard and Tony Crnkovich

9-Complicated Women: Sex and Power in Pre-Code Hollywood by Mike Lasalle

10-Fantasyland: How America Went Haywire, A 500-Year Study by Kurt Andersen

11-Miriam Hopkins: Life and Films of a Hollywood Rebel by Allan R. Ellenberger

12-Early Recordings and Musical Style; changing tastes in instrumental performance 1900-1950 by Robert Philip

13-Beethoven’s Conversation Books Volume 1 Nos. 1 To 8 (February to March 1820 Edited and Translated by Theodore Albrecht

14-The Uninhabitable Earth by David Wallace-Wells

15-The Poems of Catullus: A Bilingual Edition Translated with Commentary by Peter Green

16-Time Pieces: A Dublin Memoir by John Banville

17-Peggy to her Playwrights: The Letters of Margaret Ramsey, Play Agent’ with an Introduction by Simon Callow

18-Bright-Sided: How Positive Thinking is Undermining America’ Barbara Ehrenreich

19-Elizabeth Vigée Le Brun: The Odyssey of an Artist in an Age of Revolution

20-The Band: Pioneers of Americana Music by Craig Harris and The Band FAQ: All That’s Left to Know About the Fathers of Americana.

21-From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies (from 1974 and now revised and reissued in 1987) by film critic Molly Haskell

22-Women Who Read Are Dangerous by Stefan Bollman

23-Yasujiro Ozu by Donald Ritchie

24-This is Shakespeare by Emma Smith

25-The Jazz Singers: The Ultimate Guide, published by Backbeat Books, Yanow

26-Shakespeare for the People: Working-Class Readers 1800-1900,

27-University of Toronto: An Architectural Tour Larry Wayne Richards’

 

1-IF YOU SHOULD FAIL BY JOE MORAN: We live and we fail, repeatedly, over and over, endlessly. Why? Because we are alive, because we are human. Of course, you can’t tell this to the folks at McMaster University near my home, since they promise, blank at heart and thus blanketly, the achievement of excellence to all who enter here (thank you, Dante, for “Abandon all hope, ye who enter here” – but that was another kind of hell). Moran eschews the automatic, empty-souled, and out-of-touch, cowardly “positive thinking” of our time and prefers our looking into the mirror, where fourth-placed Olympians and Leonard da Vinci (yes, even the master reconsidered as a failure) also dwell. One feels a new beauty to one’s fucked-up life while reading Moran’s hard-hitting but insightful, provocative, and very kind book.

2-CASABLANCA: SCRIPT AND LEGEND: Certainly, there are six essays included here by the likes of Roger Ebert and Umberto Eco, but it’s an especial pleasure to read the truly classic film’s script and mutter the lines under one’s breath as one’s memory and imagination work side by side, with the help of “25 classic stills” included in the book, to become Bogie, or Ilsa if you will, and bring the film to life again for the thousandth time.

3-DARK CITY: THE LOST WORLD OF FILM NOIR: Eddie Muller’s now “Revised and Expanded Edition” appears on glossy paper with sharply-focused photos throughout, so the book is both a visual and tactile delight that one holds respectfully but lovingly in one’s hands. Muller, who hosts TCM’s weekly Noir Alley, is encyclopedic in his references and here he lives and breathes the idiom with an infectious writing style that sends us all, unselfconsciously, back to the forties and fifties. This is underbelly of America stuff, stylishly done, and very irresistible, whether you own a trench coat or not.

4-THE STORY OF WOMEN AND ART: If you want to explore the hollow, pretentious, cowardly, self-centred, artificial, destructive, stifling, unsportsmanlike, clueless, selfish, jealous, self-limiting, phony, spiritually-vacant, culture-killing, and pathetic (etc,etc.etc.) dominance of patriarchy in our culture, two invigoratingly passionate and scholarly-based series from historian Amanda Vickery are essential viewing: “The Story of Women and Power” and “The Story of Women and Art,” both highly-recommended, will surprise you at every turn, inform you richly, make you angry in your heart, fill you with admiring respect, and inspire you in ways you didn’t yet know about.

5-CURIOUS HISTORY OF SEX By Kate Lister This endlessly informative, perkily and energetically written, sometimes humorous and always challenging book ends with the following: “We must talk about consent, pleasure, masturbation, pornography, love, relationships and our own bodies. Because the only way we will dispel shame is to drag sex out in the open and have a good long look at it. History has shown us how damaging shaming sexual practices. in their myriad forms, can be. Let’s learn the lesson.”

Chapter titles include A History of the Cunt, A History of Virginity Tests, Medieval Impotence Tests, Sex and Cycling, Sex Work in the Ancient World, Filthy Fannies, Hair Today Gone Tomorrow and too often one learns how medical/cultural authority has been male stupidity at its egotistical and terrified worst. Images include an “Indian gouache painting of a giant penis copulating with a female devil c. 1900” and a photo titled: “Anonymous same-sex Victorian lovers enjoy a spot of cross-dressing and mutual masturbation.” Also included is a photo with the caption: “Tart cards in a British phone box in 2004.”

6-CLOTHES CLOTHES CLOTHES MUSIC MUSIC MUSIC BOYS BOYS BOYS by Viv Albertine   In the seventies, male-dominated, and virtuoso-worshipping rock scene in Britain, what better course for a female revolution than through a band called The Slits with a drummer called Paloma aka Palmolive, a guitarist and a bass player who knew almost nothing at first about their instruments, and a totally uninhibited lead singer aged fourteen about whom we read: “..halfway through the set she was dying for a piss, she didn’t want to leave the stage and couldn’t bear to be uncomfortable, so she just pulled down her leggings and knickers and pissed on the stage – all over the next band’s guitarist’s pedals as it happened – I was so impressed. No girl had pissed on the stage before, but Ari didn’t do it to be a rebel or to shock, it was much more subversive than that: she just needed a piss. In these times when girls are so uptight and secretive about their bodies and desperately trying to be ‘feminine’, she is a revolutionary.”

This hard-to-put-down, unflinchingly yet casually honest, uninhibited, and instinctively perceptive autobiographical account by guitarist Viv Albertine, friend of Sid Vicious and Johnny Rotten and tour-mate of The Clash, inspires affection and admiration as it takes us into the life of a young woman learning the ropes not only of making music but subtly of existence.

7-FIGHTING THEORY: AVITAL RONELL IN CONVERSATION WITH ANNE DUFOURMANTELLE. Translated by Catherine Porter

“According to Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, democracy in America began with a violent break, one that has haunted America ever since, because this violence (as we are seeing it today) keeps returning in a ruthless or ungovernable way. … And for Nietzsche as for Mary Shelly, America is a sort of laboratory that contains and spikes monstrosity also.” Elsewhere, Ronell says, “The hatred directed against women that comes out in the Judeo-Christian is hatred directed against the impulse to know.” …. Or try this, “I try to show that idiocy, for Wordsworth, for Rilke, for Wallace Stevens and others, is poetry itself. It is the place of extreme nonknowing, or rather the site of an absence of relation to knowledge, a place of pure reflection that nevertheless has nothing to do with philosophy or cognition.”

Ronell’s scope could be daunting as could her high-speed chase and nabbing of relevancies, but it is indeed an inspiring ride that stimulates, teases, informs, and dances with the reader’s mind. Learning doesn’t need to plod if it can fly, and Ronell’s mind certainly soars, all with a sense of humour and deep human feeling. As a result, it’s time to reread some Heidegger, Nietzsche, Derrida and and and….and read some more Ronell. Ronell comes across as instinctively hip in pulling in her densely-populated realm of ideas, and exciting as she does so. Is this book, as it challenges on every line, intimidating? Or does Ronell with her articulation of provocative ideas and connections constantly provide a reader with a freshly-watered path of seeds for the mind.
A very fulfilling experience.

Review # 2: Fighting Theory: Avital Ronell in Conversation with Anne Avital in which the former, considered by some “one of the most productive, established, and shrewd literary and cultural theorists of our time” displays a compelling ability to think and think about thinking at one go, to run simultaneous lines of thought with all sorts of references brought forth, and a compelling ability with surprising and fresh observations like “French theory exists first of all as a product of exportation from France; cheese, wine, things connected with pleasure, or ‘French kissing’…..The label French connotes pornography, or at least excessive exploration, disordered morality.” I enjoy her recall of meetings with German scholars who criticized her thus: “she’s spoiling our fun…she sees problems in the texts, everything becomes problematic with her.” But then, thinking seems to be a crime in our culture, as it used to be a sin in religion. In any case, this is a book for slow reading of its interweaving concepts and references (Heidegger, Derrida, and and) and much ensuing thought.

8-THE FILMS OF FAY WRAY BY Roy Kinnard and Tony Crnkovich

I think I was first curious about actress Fay Wray because she was born on an Alberta farm and, of course, was later famously paired with King Kong in both jungle and atop the Empire State Building. It’s strange how one becomes gradually fascinated by a porcelain-skinned screen actress, one whose eyes seem often rooted in a trance as she speaks with precise early talkies diction, and I progressed in no particular order through the following:

The Wedding March of 1928 with Erich von Stroheim; The Finger Points of 1931 – and the somewhat stilted early sound-era acting shows – based upon the murder of an idealistic reporter who took on gangsters and was killed for it; The Most Dangerous Game of 1932 with Joel McRea and Fay Wray stranded on a remote island where a madman Russian count enjoys hunting human prey – it is here we first have a leggy Wray in tattered dress and wide-eyed stare of horror; the classic King Kong of 1932 with its “notorious censored scene” of ape undressing woman and Miss Wray on all cylinders with wide-wide-eyed stares and screams at many a turn (terrific photos of all included); 1934’s Once to Every Woman with Wray as “dedicated nurse Mary Fanshawe in love with, and soon disillusioned by, that cheating Dr. Preston; the 1934 crime melodrama Woman in the Dark, with its Dashiell Hammett roots; and two personal favorites – a charming comedy, The Richest Girl in the World, with costars Miriam Hopkins and Joel McCrea, and a suspenseful The Clairvoyant in which Wray “certainly holds her own opposite Claude Rains, one of the screen’s greatest actors.” Rains is another one I’ve been checking out.

9-COMPLICATED WOMEN: SEX AND POWER IN PRE-CODE HOLLYWOOD by Mike LaSalle

It was indeed a “true Golden Age of women’s films” from 1929 to 1934, and we are told why: “Between 1929 and 1934, women in American film were modern! They took lovers, had babies out of wedlock, got rid of cheating husbands, enjoyed their sexuality, led unapologetic careers, and, in general, acted the way many think women acted after 1968…. Before then, women on screen had come in two varieties ‘good or bad – sweet ingenue or vamp. Then two stars came along and blasted away these stereotypes. Garbo turned the femme fatale into a woman whose capacity for love and sacrifice made all other human emotions seem pale. Meanwhile, Norma Shearer succeeded in taking the ingenue to a place she’d never been: the bedroom. Garbo and Shearer took the stereotypes and made them complicated.”

Of course, these two ladies were not alone – their companions soon included, to name only several, Claudette Colbert, Marlene Dietrich, Kay Francis, Jean Harlow, Miriam Hopkins, Barbara Stanwyck, Mae West – but then the “Production Code became law in Hollywood,” vigorously propelled by Joseph Breen, an avid Catholic, political reactionary, and anti-Semite who wrote, “These damn Jews are a dirty filthy lot.” In other words, Breen pulled real life and creativity, with much help, up the ass of right-wing America and the Catholic church. As a result, films in Hollywood were bound and gagged for three decades to follow. This too is a very important book.

10-FANTASYLAND: HOW AMERICA WENT HAYWIRE, A 500-YEAR STUDY by Kurt Andersen

Okay, let’s do Trump first. Author Kurt Anderson, co-founder in 1986 and, for seven years editor, of Spy magazine recalls the following concerning Donald Trump: “we devoted dozens of pages exposing and satirizing his lies, brutishness, egomania, and absurdity. Now everybody knows what we knew then. It was kind of providential that he came along just as we were creating a magazine to chronicle America’s rich and powerful jerks…. Trump’s reality was a reality show before that genre or term existed…Among the many shocking things about Trump is his irreligiosity – that our Christian party chose the candidate who was the least Christian of the lot, and that white evangelicals nonetheless approve of President Trump overwhelmingly.”

In this context in which a major country’s leader is a liar, cowardly bully, and a ridiculous and egomaniacal ass, he has, according to perverted logic, a great number of followers. They too live a reality-denying and fantasy existence “as the ultimate expression of our national character and path. America was founded by wishful dreamers, magical thinkers, and true believers, by impresarios and their audiences, by hucksters and their suckers. Believe what you want fantasy is deeply embedded in our DNA.”

This brilliantly conceived and realized book is informative, mind-opening, keenly insightful, and gripping in its detailed and intriguing narrative. It is also disturbing as hell, and after each dip into the text I need a break from this unrelenting account of a fucked-up country whose founding dreams were made of Puritanical severity, whose exploratory impetus was out and out greed, whose nobility of heart was too often racist and sexist suppression, and whose rugged individualism was self-centred and immature inability to face life as it is without hypocrisy. I’ve personally known, admired, loved even, a number of Americans who were and are special human beings. They despair of Trump, and his America, as much as the rest of us – and despair of his followers.

11-MIRIAM HOPKINS: LIFE AND FILMS OF A HOLLYWOOD REBEL by Allan R. Ellenberger

What is it about the great actresses who emerged in the thirties? A subtle feminine grandeur? A confidence of being that imbued every performance with solid but unforced presence? A blend of individual human personality and complex technical smarts that shaped every character with distinct qualities? A long-lasting impact because we can’t imagine their performances done any other way? A knack for greatness in the art of acting? The mystery of everyday womanhood?

Here are the films of Miriam Hopkins I have watched from one to ten times already and will again watch again any time anywhere. Take the dinner scene of Hopkins and Herbert Marshall in Trouble in Paradise directed with a polished sense of sexual fun and European sophistication for adults by Ernest Lubitsch – she pickpockets his watch, he her garter, and both delight in the game, and so do we. Or watch the two films in which Hopkins and her archrival Bette Davis star together – Old Acquaintance and The Old Maid – and compare how two theatrical presences emerge and hold their ground, each in competition with the other. In the former film, Davis gets to shake Hopkins quite violently and no doubt quite happily so– it’s in the script. Yet in Men Are Not Gods, Hopkins is quite touching in her compassion for an actress who is pregnant and the actor, her husband, with whom Hopkins is in love.

Or what about the two men and Hopkins of Design for Living and her believably casual final resolution – why not have both? Hopkins is quite at home in The Heiress among de Haviland, Clift and Richardson and gut-wrenching during and after the rape in The Story of Temple Drake. Do you know a sexier moment in film than when Hopkins as the “sluttish” Champaigne Ivy sits naked and sheet-covered on a bed and dangling her naked leg to tempt Dr Jekyll to “come back soon?”

Perhaps Hopkins was “one of the most difficult stars in Hollywood” but she was also gifted and admirably gutsy in taking charge of her film and stage careers. She had intellectuals Dreiser, Parker, and Stein as friends and had “a close and enduring friendship with Tennessee Williams.” In The Richest Girl in the World, the scene where Hopkins realizes she is coming to love Joel McCrea is a lesson in reaction acting with Hopkins doing a whole palette of expressions – I’ve watched this scene several dozen times. And I recommend this book about an underrated and overlooked major actress.

12-EARLY RECORDINGS AND MUSICAL STYLE; changing tastes in instrumental performance 1900-1950 by Robert Philip

Author Robert Philip spells out his purpose at the outset: “Recordings show how performance has gradually changed from the early twentieth century to our own time”. and we can witness how “performing styles can be seen as remnants of nineteenth century style.” “They demonstrate how the practices of the late twentieth century, including those we take entirely for granted, have evolved. The greatest value of this is that it forces us to question unspoken assumptions about modern taste, and about the ways in which we use it to justify our interpretations of earlier performance practice.”

The recordings of the early twentieth century are the link between two eras and they provide a “valuable key to understanding both the development of modern performance practice, and the practices of earlier centuries,” Philip also points out. One of the themes running through this book is that “musicians do not necessarily do what they say” … “and that in many cases it would be impossible to deduce everyday features of performance without the recordings” Philip takes us through quite detailed comparisons and discussions in chapters titled, for example, Flexibility of Tempo, String Vibrato, Orchestral Portamento, Tempo Rubato, and Long and Short Notes.

Be warned that you’ll inevitably compile a list of performances you have to hear, really hear. I am so tempted by this passage: “On recordings, the contrast between the old and the new school is very vivid. Sometimes the two styles can be heard side by side, for example in the famous recording of J. S. Bach’s Concerto for Two Violins made in 1915 by Kreisler and Zimbalist. This shows very clearly the difference between Kreisler’s continuous vibrato, which was unusual at that date, and Zimbalist’s traditional, more sparing use of it…”

Review # 2- No doubt you have often wondered, “What is the relationship between performance and recording? How are modern audiences affected by the trends set in motion by the recording era? What is the impact of recordings on the lives of musicians?” Happily, ROBERT PHILIP – a lecturer, music critic, broadcaster, writer, and performer – has also had these questions in mind and he breaks new historical and aesthetic ground in his PERFORMING MUSIC IN THE AGE OF RECORDING. Often, we can only piece together a hypothetical take on the styles of Brahms, Liszt, Chopin, and everyone else in the 19th century, but Philip makes such exploration a music-lover’s adventure, especially since we might not have recordings of a composer playing but we do have a student of a student of the composer in question on old 78s. And to think that Philip’s idea of doing research by listening was first met with academic disdain!

13-BEETHOVEN’S CONVERSATION BOOKS VOLUME 1 NOS. 1 TO 8 (FEBRUARY TO MARCH 1820 Edited and Translated by Theodore Albrecht

Beethoven lovers rejoice! A few months ago, this announcement grabbed my attention: “A complete new edition of Beethoven’s conversation books, now translated into English in their entirety for the first time. Covering a period associated with the revolutionary style of what we call “late Beethoven”, these often lively and compelling conversations are now finally accessible in English for the scholar and Beethoven-lover.”

Beethoven had increasing deafness from around 1798 and by 1818, he’d begun “carrying blank booklets with him, for his acquaintances to jot their sides of conversations, while he answered aloud. Often, he himself used the pocket-sized booklets to make shopping lists and other reminders, including occasional early sketches for his compositions. Today, 139 of these booklets survive, covering the years 1818 up to the composer’s death in 1827 and including such topics as music, history, politics, art, literature, theatre, religion, and education as perceived on a day-to-day basis in post-Napoleonic Europe.”

I’m now reading “February 1818 to March 1820” which means having a huge number of “new footnotes exclusive to this edition and brand-new introductions” in support of comments written by a variety of individuals who chatted and dined and drank with Beethoven. We don’t learn much of Beethoven’s own thinking, since the books usually contain questions and responses of Beethoven’s company at the time and not Beethoven’s own verbal comments and responses.

The editor has much to deal with, from, say, the self-serving forging of entries of Schindler, Beethoven’s occasional friend/secretary, to even the changing of numbering system on Vienna’s streets, to passing indications – perhaps – of Beethoven’s being commissioned to compose the Missa Solemnis. Let’s face it, these books, chaotic and mysterious as they can be on each page, do suggest fascinating aspects of the day-to-day life of a great composer. What did Beethoven say to evoke a specific comment, one often wonders, and one is gradually drawn, in countless fragments of conversation, into the world of a great creative spirit and mind.

14-THE UNINHABITABLE EARTH by David Wallace-Wells: The earth’s dire future, predicted – and far too much ignored or denied – not too long ago, is now our daily horrifying present tense, one which Wallace-Wells thoroughly details in chapters like Heat Death, Hunger, Dying Oceans, Unbreathable Air, and Economic Collapse. And, of course I still read just recently another smug and arrogant right-wing denier on the editorial page of Britain’s The Daily Telegraph. And like many others I do become angry whenever it is obvious that the fate of the world and all life forms are at the mercy of childishly egotistical and indifferent leaders and their followers who live only to look the other way.

15- THE POEMS OF CATULLUS: A BILINGUAL EDITION Translated with Commentary by Peter Green may have its critics among classicists regarding translation of specific words or cultural accuracy or even among poets regarding meter and awareness of poetic methods, but this edition does offer the appeal of an energetic personality with an assertive, sometimes confrontational, attitude that makes for a compelling read. Try #16 opening with “Up yours both, and sucks to the pair of you.” There is much here that arouses delight, and who knows what else?

16-I once interviewed author John Banville, a man who spontaneously answered my many questions, including those about writing, in beautifully constructed paragraphs. So, I read his TIME PIECES: A DUBLIN MEMOIR very slowly, surely with the intent to savour his quietly delicious and subtly moving writing. Also, to take in his connection to memory, time, cultural detail, and all else in one’s life that walks a fine line between remembering and reconstructing the past. “Dublin was never my Dublin, which made it all the more alluring. I was born in Wexford…” he begins, and later continues, “December days in the approach to Christmas are short, and end with a sense of soft collapse.” And he later exclaims, “Oh to be unhappy in the arms of Monica Vitti!” when first seeing L’Avventura. Oh, yes, agreed, give me some of that unhappiness!

17-Talking of delicious, the back cover of PEGGY TO HER PLAYWRIGHTS: THE LETTERS OF MARGARET RAMSEY, PLAY AGENT WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY SIMON CALLOW offers the following passage to David Hare from Ms Ramsey, a woman devoted to theatre and writing of the highest standards and writers of the highest integrity: “Fuck the critics. They’ve all compromised or sold out. They are failures. Along comes a shining child of twenty-six and tells them what’s wrong with them. They aren’t big enough to take the blows.” This book is an informed, opinionated, and exciting ride inside the real world of theatrical creativity and politics. Ramsey is a thorough pleasure to read and – why not? – perhaps emulate.

18-Whenever I weary of the ever-present denial of life’s hard realities posing as ‘positive thinking’ or ‘religion’ or ‘spirituality,’ I take an audio recording of BARBARA EHRENREICH’S BRIGHT-SIDED: HOW POSITIVE THINKING IS UNDERMINING AMERICA’ for another listen in the car, and find myself again applauding how this sharply-honed and ‘take no BS writer’ takes on both religious hypocrites and opportunistic new age gurus who make a good buck from the – take your pick – helplessness, gullibility, stupidity, or hopelessness of their followers. Her next book is Natural Causes: An Epidemic of Wellness, The Certainty of Dying, and Killing Ourselves to Live Longer, which, like the first, I’ve read, listened to, and thanked from the bottom of my sanity.

19-ELIZABETH VIGÉE LE BRUN: THE ODYSSEY OF AN ARTIST IN AN AGE OF REVOLUTION tells the story of an artist who has become a personal favorite, and I’m not alone in my high regard since Joshua Reynolds himself esteemed her higher than Van Dyck. I once flipped out over her technical mastery and depiction of character in her Self-portrait in a Straw Hat in London’s National Gallery where I later declared to the bookstore custodian – with her ensuing startled look – that the artist had the most kissable lips in town. Being Marie Antoinette’s favorite portraitist, Vigée le Brun had to quickly depart Paris after 1789, for travels in Italy, Austria, Russia, and England, during which both her clientele and her fame grew. This fascinating but discreet biography is as informed as possible, with sympathetic reference to the artist’s autobiography, and written in the somewhat guarded enthusiasm of academic prose.

20-The closest I ever got to The Band was through interviewing Garth Hudson some years ago in 2005. Recently, I have been deep-diving again into the one-of-a-kind and richly-realized music of The Band and, to support my listening to ten of their albums (okay, one is by a solo Rick Danko), have read two meticulously researched, consistently informative, sometimes eye-opening books: THE BAND: PIONEERS OF AMERICANA MUSIC BY CRAIG HARRIS AND THE BAND FAQ: ALL THAT’S LEFT TO KNOW ABOUT THE FATHERS OF AMERICANA. The Harris book grabbed me early with its reference to If I Had a Hammer, originally The Hammer Song by The Weavers on the Hootenanny label (a 78-rpm recording I once owned). The FAQ chapter on clubs connected to The Band – or Ronnie Hawkins, actually – took me down memory lane of Toronto’s Le Coq d’Or, Warwick Hotel, Friar’s Tavern, Edison Hotel, Steele’s Tavern (yep, I heard Gordon Lightfoot there), Embassy Club, and Hamilton’s Golden Rail and Grange Tavern (there was one other where Hamilton Place was later built – name???). Both books are good reads full of information and certainly make one appreciate The Band even more.

21-FROM REVERENCE TO RAPE: THE TREATMENT OF WOMEN IN THE MOVIES (from 1974 and now revised and reissued in 1987) by film critic MOLLY HASKELL takes an encyclopedic, feminist, acutely perceptive, insightfully critical, and ground-breaking look at the images of woman in film right from cinema’s beginnings. Haskell has a discerning mind and an evocative and razor-sharp writing style to match, so her take on women in cinema is always thought-provoking and challenging as she explores, say, the three types of women characters who appear in the woman’s film – the extraordinary woman, the ordinary woman, and ordinary woman who becomes extraordinary – and considers factors in a film woman’s life like the sacrifices she must make or the afflictions she endures or the choices on her plate or competition with other women. We rethink a great deal because of Haskell, say, about the misrepresentation of Doris Day as a professional virgin. Haskell is right on about Jeanne Moreau, Ingmar Bergman, Catherine Deneuve, and Francois Truffaut who “cannot, does not. lead innocence over the divide into experience.” Much here for both women and men to think about.

22-WOMEN WHO READ ARE DANGEROUS BY STEFAN BOLLMAN contains this passage: “Reading now meant identifying with the emotions of another as expressed on paper, and thereby exploring and expanding the horizons of one’s emotional potential.” In other words, women who enter the worlds of worthy authors, enter with their imaginations and minds beyond the immediate control of the patriarchal cultures in which they live. They can learn more of life in the world and thumb a ride on the trajectories of their independent thoughts. Each painting in this beautiful collection of often new discoveries faces a sympathetic and often poetic description, but what often strikes the reader is the intense concentration and unviolated privacy of the depicted reader. Each painting is a world unto itself and we must give of ourselves to enter it.

23-Yasujiro Ozu is considered by the Japanese to be “the most Japanese of all their directors” says DONALD RITCHIE in his full-length critical work on the director, OZU, has its sections titled Introduction, Script, Shooting, Editing, Conclusion, plus a very detailed Biographical Filmography. I’ve been under Ozu’s spell for a long time via Criterion Collection prints of his late in career but sometimes very early in career films, been under the spell of one of his stars, the mysteriously radiant Setsuko Hara (even bought a book of her film photographs from Japan and, yep, it was in Japanese). But it’s hard not to treasure Ozu’s ability to stress subtly the profundities of day-to-day life, to present light brush stroke insights into human psychology and behavior, to imply so much by nuance. Ozu loved his sake, lots of it especially when working on shooting scripts, and, unmarried, he lived with his mother until her death, and he shows us so much about people and about ourselves with his usually knee-high camera angle and loads of spiritual and directorial artistry that we slowly come to understand.

24-Another essential book on Shakespeare? I used to have six or seven such books which felt fresh with each re-connection, and I’m adding THIS IS SHAKESPEARE by EMMA SMITH to that list of reference pleasures. How can one resist a book that begins, in the Introduction, with “Lots of what we trot out about Shakespeare…? blah blah blah is just not true, and just not important.” Whatever your take on Shakespeare, this book will challenge it and enlighten you with fresh perspectives on his plays. After reading Smith on Coriolanus, 1 Henry IV, Twelfth Night, and The Tempest, I already reread the sixteen-page chapter on Coriolanus again, just to enjoy her inventive and informed perspective, her seductively fresh and undeniable writing style, her passionate commitment to Shakespeare as a master of theatricality and theatrical meanings, and her ability to communicate and celebrate the playwright’s “gappy” quality. Smith maintains “Gappiness is Shakespeare’s dominant and defining characteristic. And ambiguity is the oxygen of these works…”

25-SCOTT YANOW has, for over thirty years, written for every key jazz magazine around, from DownBeat to Coda, and I’ve long heeded his reviews in the All Music Guide to Jazz. He is thoroughly-brewed in both his love and knowledge of jazz; he is balanced, giving but firm, and engagingly passionate in his assessments; he has a knack for placing crucial historical and biographical facts; and yes, he is a pleasure to read. In his appropriately titled THE JAZZ SINGERS: THE ULTIMATE GUIDE, published by Backbeat Books, Yanow provides profiles of over 500 vocalists in the idiom from the likes of Ma Rainey, Bessie Smith and Jelly Roll Morton up to the freshly-minted breed of today that includes Diana Krall and Cassandra Wilson. You’ll find here many lesser known but worthy vocalists, recommended recordings, often websites of the singers, and chapters titled “198 Other Jazz Singers of Today,”55 Others Who Have Also Sung Jazz,” “30 Jazz Vocal Groups,” and a listing of suggested DVDs. One reason, I’ll read and re-read this Guide is for a fresh take on the singers; for example, I’ve known swing and classic jazz singer Alex Pangman for some years and still learned new stuff from Yanow’s entry on Alex.

26-SHAKESPEARE FOR THE PEOPLE: WORKING-CLASS READERS 1800-1900, published by Cambridge University Press, is a compelling study that is rich with humanity, partly because author Andrew Murphy uses as his resource more than a hundred fascinating autobiographical texts, from the era, in either published and manuscript form. Thus, we discover the profound connection between bard and working-class readership, with special focus upon radical readers “for whom Shakespeare’s work had a special political resonance.” We also learn how access to cheaper editions and public elementary education in Britain developed over the nineteenth century and how, in time, Shakespeare became “annexed” by an academic elite while the working class also turned instead to “mass-circulation newspapers or fiction.” We meet numerous individuals in this intriguing study, like Betsy Cadwaladyr who worked as a servant, ship steward, and nurse in the Crimean War with Florence Nightingale, all the while a diligent reader –and actor- of Shakespeare.

27-Because I did my M.A. at U of T, even before some of the buildings discussed herein were built, LARRY WAYNE RICHARDS’ handsomely produced UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO: AN ARCHITECTURAL TOUR from Princeton Architectural Press brings many memories of decades ago to vivid recollection, especially because Tom Arban’s stunning photographs are both bold and mysterious at one time and Richards’ text well serves both historical and guidebook ends. More than 170 buildings from all three campuses –St. George, Scarborough, and Mississauga- are featured, and one can read the background of, say, University College of 1858, Hart House of 1919, Massey College of 1963, and even the Royal Ontario Museum with photographs from both 1914 when it opened and today when it went wild on Bloor Street in architect Daniel Libeskind’s hands.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

HANNA SHYBAYEVA & UTRECHT STRING QUARTET BEETHOVEN PIANO CONCERTOS 3 & 4……CD -DVD-BOOK OF THE WEEK


Hanna Shybayeva’s somewhat recent CD arrived this afternoon and I’ve been doing a repeated back and forth, between Beethoven’s 3rd and 4th concerti, well into this evening. What an absolute pleasure these performances are, transcribed for piano and string quartet with bass added. Both are dynamic and intriguing in the interaction of piano and strings, both display a seductively assured yet subtly mysterious presence throughout. I know these works from many live and recorded listens, but now I hear them anew – I mean that – in these two spirited performances. Shybayeva carries one along with pianism that projects poise and dignity, one that is exciting with musical purpose. Her tone is ripe and firm, deeply rich with the security and beauty of, say, a precious jewel. I hold my breath for new discoveries in what I am hearing from both piano and strings- and they certainly continue to appear.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

COMPOSER/PIANIST FRANK HORVAT EXPLAINS HIS LATEST RECORDINGS: “I STARTED WITH THE HEALING ELECTRONIC SOUNDS OF ‘HAPPINESS IN A TROUBLED WORLD,’ FOLLOWED BY SOLOS FOR OUR TIME, ‘MUSIC FOR SELF-ISOLATION,’ AND NOW ‘PROJECT DOVETAIL’ WHICH FEATURES SOME OF MY CHAMBER COMPOSITIONS THAT ARE INSPIRED BY OTHER FORMS OF ART, LIKE VISUAL ART, LITERATURE, AND FILM” …. A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us what you want the public to know about your recent project or one you are actively working on. For instance, what is it, why is it, and how is it done? Also, please tell us about your collaborators.

FRANK HORVAT: The album, Project Dovetail, marks the final release in a trilogy of releases in 2021. I started with the healing electronic sounds of Happiness in a Troubled World, followed by solos for our time, Music for Self-Isolation, and now Project Dovetail. Project Dovetail features some of my chamber compositions that are inspired by other forms of art…visual art, literature, film, etc. Project Dovetail features some of Canada’s top chamber musicians, including Edwin Huizinga (violin), TorQ Percussion Quartet, Kathryn Ladano (bass clarinet), Elixir Baroque Ensemble, Elizabeth Reid (viola)

JS: Please give us a brief autobiography, some stuff about yourself, that is relevant to this project.

FH: Born and raised in Ottawa (only child to loving parents who are immigrants to Canada). Lived my entire life in Toronto (stayed after attending U of T). Other than composing, I have also led my life as a performing pianist and music educator. I am very passionate about using my artistic output as a platform to bring attention to mental health issues, climate change and human rights.

JS: In what ways was this project easy to do and in what ways was it difficult to realize? How long did or will it take and why that long?

FH: It was quite easy to work on this project since I had musicians and engineers go through the recording process with me that are not only talented, but so easy-going and friendly. The challenge was the disruptions to our recording schedule due to the pandemic (the album was supposed to come out 1 year ago), but it was not a serious issue in the end and I’m so happy how it all turned out.

JS: Please us how you fund such a project, or how others help.

FH: I feel grateful to have received support from the Canada Council for the Arts and FACTOR to fund the production of this album.

JS: How did doing this project change you as a person and as a creator?

FH: Many of the recording sessions for this album were conducted during the pandemic. Despite precautions in the studio, it made me realize how resilient musicians are…we can create music under the most unprecedented circumstances.

JS: What kind of audience will this project interest? What new audience are you also seeking? Why to both questions?

FH: I hope that the album will be appreciated by both connoisseurs of modern classical music and those who are interested in the arts in general as they might find it interesting how all these other artistic disciplines inspired me to compose these works. I hope they will see a connection through the sound of the music.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate about the work you produce or do?

FH: That’s a great question. I don’t really think about this as I never want my compositional process to be influenced by what an audience might think. I want the creative process to be as organic as possible.

JS: How are you planning to promote, market, and sell this project to the public?

FH: Spotify and YouTube are going to be the main platforms I hope people will experience the work. My wife, Lisa, is a talented video artist and she has plans to produce new videos featuring the works from the album.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

FH: This might sound a bit “corny” to say, but it’s literally my heart and soul. I am a passionate individual about life so my music must also stand that litmus test.

JS: What are our biggest challenges as a creative person?

FH: It’s interesting that the biggest challenge happens to also be what I am most grateful about my life as a composer. Commissions and funding for projects can come my way in such an erratic way. I don’t have a steady paycheque so to speak. Even though that can feel precarious, it’s also exciting as I never know where the next opportunity might come from…. life always feels fresh.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that brought you to the creation of this work.

FH: Many of the compositions on this album were composed within the last 10 years. That time period was a time of creative revelation for me as I felt that I was becoming secure with my compositional voice. So, the release of this album is very much a celebration of that for me personally.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

FH: That I am not an entrepreneur. There are many similarities between artists and entrepreneurs, but the key difference is that an entrepreneur looks at society and seeks to provide a product or service which is underserved or does not exist. On the other hand, a true artist creates what’s from their heart oblivious to the taste of the public and then markets the hell out of it afterwards. I’ve had many well-intentioned people ask me, “why don’t you compose music people want to hear?” I then have to explain how I’m different than a business person.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted as yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

FH: As a composer, I would like to compose more choral music. I have composed very little thus far and I know I could create some wonderful works. I love the genre so much and get inspired by it. It just happened yet because most of the opportunities has just not gone in that direction yet…but I hope it does.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

FH: I honestly would not change anything. I am extremely blessed to do what I love and to do it with people I appreciate. I hear a lot of people saying they wish things might happened earlier in life but I’m not like that. Everything happens for a reason.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

FH: Because of technology, we leave in an artistic world that has democratized the distribution of the work. So, if you create something that resonates with people, they will find it some way or another. What concerns me is how the world will consume live performances moving forward as a ramification from the pandemic.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create and/or do?

FH: That my work is an extension of what makes me tick as a human being…my hopes, fears and dreams. So, if someone never meets me personally, my work will still give them some insight into me.

JS: What exactly has the impact of the COVID pandemic been on your creative work and your life in the arts?

FH: The pandemic has been an incredibly productive time for me creatively. Being stuck at home has eliminated life distractions and given me focus on my craft. It’s reminded me that as artists, we can face many roadblocks, but still do what we do. And that’s so important.

JS: How has the pandemic changed you as a person?

FH: It has strengthened my life belief that I must traverse focussing as much as possible on what I have the ability to control and not worry about what’s out of my control.

JS: What’s next in the coming few years of your creative life?

FH: I’m so excited about many interesting commissions that I will start working on, including projects where I not only collaborate with other musicians but artists of other disciplines as well.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

DANCER OLGA BARRIOS PERFORMS SEPTEMBER 29 AT FALL FOR DANCE NORTH: A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about one or more projects that you have been working on or have recently completed. Why exactly do they matter to you and why should they matter to others?

OLGA BARRIOS: Recently I co-produced and presented the Vanguardia Dance Festival in Toronto in collaboration with my good friend and talented artist Norma Araiza. We created that festival in 2008 with the purpose of having a platform for us (independent artists of Latin American background) to present our works, and we have done it bi-annually since then. At that moment we were struggling to have the option of being selected to present our pieces in the regular festivals and platforms. The project has grown incredibly, and we have had the opportunity of supporting many artists of our community.

It matters because this project has given us the option to grow as producers, artists and of course as persons, while we support other people to grow. And it should matter to others because it is a space to support incredible artists of the minorities.

Also, the work Meitiza – (Mixed woman in Spanish). That I will be presenting at Night Shift. It is a project that departs from a personal research on cultural identity as choreographer of latinx background, digging into the traces of my indigenous origin in Colombia, where the traces of indigenous people have been erased as in many places in the globe. Thus, it expands in a wider dialogue based on the woman of many colors that I am, and with the many other voices that look for connection with those ideas of erased traces on history. The work looks for an extended dialogue with the diverse voices in the Americas. I expect to continue digging into questions in form and content such as in the corporal gesture, the protocols of the stage, the video, the voice and the sound landscape. I also look for an approach to the analysis of the voice of mixed-raced woman in a contemporary society and in my history.

JS: How did doing these projects change you as a person and as a creator?

OB: I consider the arts a basin link in the process of building community and society. So, all my artistic processes change me in a way of construction. Pursuing tools to become a piece of society that brings humanity, analysis, and new perspectives to the spaces I inhabit and the people that surround me.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate about the work you produce or do?

OB: I think people appreciate my work on different levels, depending on the place where I stand with my work. I move through the realities of a “first and a third world”. So, the perspectives are many. I think what people can’t understand deeply sometimes is the amount of work that each process has. Or maybe it is that sometimes artists do not show much. The behind the scenes, the research time, the everyday questions of development, the multiple hats to make possible the realization of a work, the over work, the hard work.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

OB: I put all myself. My full body, my time, my energy, my questions about life, my inquiries about society, depending on the moment of life where I am. I work full time in my craft. All what I do in terms of living I project into my work.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

OB: Big challenges are time and money, sometimes to bring to life all the ideas on the table, or in the list of projects. However, those are things that creative people navigate in order to make things happen… but those are there constantly.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

OB: My parents supported me when I decided to switch my ideas of a career and pursue my artistic career. Even though they were not people from the arts, and we are originally from a country where being an artist is maybe for some people with certain privileges, they gave me all their energy to support my ideas, without thinking if that was a regular career or even a career. After their support and energy, I found that the possibilities were within me. So, they are the main impulse motor that supports the whole thing. After that, I have worked in arts most of my life, and I have found in my work a strong place to belong into a society and into diverse communities.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

OB: Most people think a person cannot live from working in the arts. But I have had the opportunity to do it. It demands a lot of work, and many hats, and of course artists we have to be very creative to survive and to develop the work.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted as yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

OB: I already move between two countries developing projects, and I have created a bridge between Canada and Colombia. I am still developing those projects for more people. However, I would like to move more of my work to different countries. The delay is having the time to find the connections to move, and again time to go beyond the projects that I have right now.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

OB: I really like all that I have lived so far, so maybe I will need a parallel life to do a few more things here and there. But probably, going into some intensive courses or working with other companies in other countries, for instance, but those are things that might happen, but if not, I have had the privilege of working with amazing artists.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

OB: I see hope when the questions arise. I see hope when we question the models of society through our ideas in the arts. I see hope when artists and of course my students have a critical analysis of the hegemonic structures. I see hope when an honest proposal crosses my path. And I find it depressing when we start seeing art as a product.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create and/or do?

OB: I feel very fortunate to have the opportunity to do my work. That’s it what I like the most, to be able to do it. Of course, I like to move, to create, to contemplate, to explore, to do different things, to take diverse ways to go to places. To be on the move.

JS: In your creative life thus far, what have been the most helpful comments you have heard about your work?

OB: I don ́t really remember exactly the comments, but I have had feedback from very diverse people including kids. And that is very rewarding, all feedback makes the work continue growing and moving.

JS: What exactly has the impact of the COVID pandemic been on your creative work and your life in the arts?

OB: It has had a strong impact. How to teach, how to perceive space, how to dialogue with my work through the screen, how to video/choregraph. How to re-connect with open spaces. I have been working constantly site-specific but these times have made us think of the scenic arts in diverse ways. A lot to learn, to think also about arts in terms of life and society.

JS: How has the pandemic changed you as a person?

OB: I was very blocked at the beginning, it made me question many things in relation to the socio-political, the environmental, privileges and life itself … I imagine there are as many on this planet. Then, my survival side jumped, and I started creating like crazy. But it also made me think about honoring my present and to be more generous with my time, my ideas, and with myself. I would say more fragile and also stronger at the same time.

JS: Finally, what do you yourself find to be the most intriguing and/or surprising things about you?

OB: I couldn ́t really tell. I find myself in a continuous dialogue with myself… However, one thing might be the continued internal drive to move and to create, that sometimes helps others to go with me in the ride.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

DANCER BAKARI IFASEGUN LINDSAY PERFORMS OCTOBER 2 AT FALL FOR DANCE NORTH: A REVIEWER INTERVIEWS PEOPLE IN THE ARTS

JAMES STRECKER: Please tell us about one or more projects that you have been working on or have recently completed. Why exactly do they matter to you and why should they matter to others?

BAKARI IFASEGUN LINDSAY: You might not be expecting this answer, but the most recent project I have been working on has been my health. I was diagnosed with a life altering illness which had both an emotional and physical impact on my life. I guess my creative mind is what saved me. It certainly put a reflective perspective on my life as an artist because for three and half months I was incapable of moving beyond going from my back to my side which took a great deal of effort and caused tremendous pain. For a moment I thought I would not be able to dance again.

JS: How did doing these projects change you as a person and as a creator?

BIL: Well, I guess I can say it has opened my heart to appreciating the smaller things in life. I look at a lot of sunrises and sunsets. I even notice the fact that I am walking because there was a time just to walk was a challenge.

JS: What might others not understand or appreciate about the work you produce or do?

BIL: I work from an Africanist movement aesthetic that has reached a level of development and sophistication that it sometimes seems inherent because of my ethnicity (African Descent). So, the years of research and development get overlooked as natural talent.

JS: What are the most important parts of yourself that you put into your work?

BIL: The most important parts of myself that is in all my work are my spirituality, style and identity. Sometimes the use of spiritual elements is deliberate, while other times they are understated and support the performance. Design and beauty are key elements in my creative process, while my experiences often influence the work.

JS: What are your biggest challenges as a creative person?

BIL: Time, there never seems to be enough time to thoroughly investigate work through the creative process. Which I guess is tied to resources, both physical and intellectual.

JS: Imagine that you are meeting two or three people, living or dead, whom you admire because of their work in your form of artistic expression. What would you say to them and what would they say to you?

BIL: I would love to meet the late Martha Graham, and Alvin Ailey.

‘If you were not able to dance or create dance, what would you have done?’ It’s difficult to know what they would probably say, but they have left phenomenal words of wisdom.

JS: Please describe at least one major turning point in your life that helped to make you who you are as a creative artist.

BIL: Working with Vincent Mantsoe, the physical and spiritual power he was able to evoke in my dancing influenced my notion of physical limits for movement.

JS: What are the hardest things for an outsider to understand about your life as a person in the arts?

BIL: I feel it’s the insanity to practice an art form that offers so little financial rewards, but yet we continue to practice.

JS: Please tell us what you haven’t attempted as yet that you would like to do in the arts? Why the delay so far?

BIL: I think I have attempted all that has interested me artistically; however, there are opportunities that I would like to have, such as creating work for bodies that exist outside of my physical aesthetic.

JS: If you could re-live your life in the arts, how would you change it and why?

BIL: No regrets, no changes. I have a full, notice I said have and not had, because I plan to have lots more of an artistic life.

JS: Let’s talk about the state of the arts in today’s society, including the forms in which you work. What specifically gives you hope and what specifically do you find depressing?

BIL: It’s depressing, but very little gives me hope in the ARTS. There seems to be less and less resources and respect for the form. The advent of technology has made the arts and artist dispensable.

JS: What exactly do you like about the work you create and/or do?

BIL: My work often transforms an audience and that excites me. I love that I tell physical stories that offers transcendence to the audience participant.

JS: In your creative life thus far, what have been the most helpful comments you have heard about your work?

BIL: That the work was developing a new Canadiana in dance.

JS: What exactly has the impact of the COVID pandemic been on your creative work and your life in the arts?

BIL: Hmmmm, because I was ill for most of the pandemic it has not really impacted me yet. I guess I am slowly getting back to it. I would say ask me in a year from now.

JS: How has the pandemic changed you as a person?

BIL: Yea, my illness coincided with the pandemic, so my focus has been on me and not so much of the pandemic. I guess as I begin to reintegrate into regular life, whatever that is, I will have to reflect. Ask me in a year or so.

JS: Finally, what do you yourself find to be the most intriguing and/or surprising things about you?

BIL: I am a very spontaneous person; however, I am a very methodical and analytical person which is kind of an oxymoron.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment