An interview with political columnist & author Linda McQuaig

From my archives of a few years ago, here’s political columnist and author Linda McQuaig on Harper’s Record, Harper’s Plans, the Economy, Afghanistan, Leadership, NAFTA, and Bush’s “New Poodle”
********************************************************

Linda McQuaig’s distinguished and controversial career as a razor-sharp analyst and devastating critic of the establishment includes a National Newspaper Award in 1989 while at The Globe and Mail, a stint as Senior Writer for Maclean’s magazine, an Atkinson Fellowship for Journalism in Public Policy to study the social welfare systems in Europe and North America, and, since 2002, the position of op-ed columnist for the Toronto Star. She is the author of seven nationally best-selling books on politics and economics which include Shooting the Hippo, which was short-listed for the Governor General’s Award for Non-Fiction, The Cult of Impotence, All You Can Eat, and It’s the Crude, Dude: War, Big Oil and the Fight for the Planet. Of the latter, Noam Chomsky has written “McQuaig’s perceptive inquiry into the world’s energy system….is an urgent wake-up call that should –that must- be acted upon, without delay.” Her latest book is Holding the Bully’s Coat: Canada and the U.S. Empire published by Doubleday Canada in 2007.

James Strecker: Please evaluate Harper’s past record as Prime Minister insofar as his policies will have impact on Canada’s future, especially in the areas of health care, culture, resources, food safety, foreign policy, and the environment?

Linda McQuaig: I’d say that Harper’s record is negative in all these areas. He clearly wants to reduce the important role government can play in all of them. But his impact has been particularly destructive in the last two – foreign policy and the environment.

In foreign policy, he’s introduced a downright militaristic approach that is completely out of sync with Canadian values and traditions. Canada managed in the past to earn some respect in the world, not by aggressively striding across the world stage, but rather by promoting worthwhile causes in the international arena – like banning landmines, promoting nuclear disarmament and establishing the International Criminal Court. And, most notably, we distinguished ourselves by being a leading nation when it came to UN peacekeeping; Lester Pearson effectively invented UN peacekeeping with his leadership role in solving the Suez Crisis in 1956.

This commitment to UN peacekeeping and other worthwhile international causes had already begun to erode under the Liberals, particularly under Paul Martin. But the retreat from peacekeeping and the glorification of the military has become considerably more intense under the Harper government. Harper has greatly increased military spending, pushing it up from $13 billion in 2005 to $21.5 billion by 2010. And, contrary to what you always hear, our military spending was already sufficient. We were already the 7th biggest military spender among the 26 nations of NATO. That put us in the top one-third of military spenders in NATO. In fact, Canada has been increasing its military spending, even as most NATO countries have been decreasing theirs.

Of course, this is all part of the way Harper has brought our foreign policy more closely in line with Washington’s, as we integrate into their military industrial complex. We’ve become a helpful junior partner in George Bush’s absurd and destructive “war on terror,” operating as his point man in Afghanistan, and pressuring the other NATO countries to fall in line with America. I think it’s fair to say that, with the retirement of Tony Blair, Harper has become Bush’s new “poodle.”

As for the environment, I’ll just quickly say that the Harper government has been nothing short of a disaster. Obviously, climate change is one of the most pressing issues facing the planet – if not the most pressing – and yet the Harper government has no serious plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. And Harper has actively obstructed progress at international meetings on climate change. The Sierra Club of Canada, a respected environmental group, gives Harper an F+ for his climate change policy. (All the other national parties get a B or higher.) The only part of that ranking I don’t understand is the + part of the F+. I think a straight F would be more appropriate.

James: A self-regulating food industry, Canadian culture as a punching bag, forty year mortgages, Canada walking on quicksand with the Americans in Afghanistan. ….what else do you think Harper has planned for us in the future, should he gain a majority government?

Linda: I think you’ve captured the general drift. Who knows how far he would go? But we do know where he’d like to go, and if he had an acquiescent media, which is pretty likely, he’d probably push it pretty far. Let’s not forget his background as head of the National Citizens’ Coalition – a group that was originally set up to fight public health care and has never given up the dream of health care privatization. We also know that he’s close to evangelical Christians, who are more of a force to be reckoned with in Canada than is commonly appreciated, and who would become much more demanding with a Harper government that had a majority. We know that Harper is also ideologically committed to ever-lower taxes, which means less revenue to rebuild badly-gutted government social programs. We saw the way Harper utterly failed to use the enormous government surpluses of the past two years to rebuild these social programs, not to mention rebuilding our public infrastructure and making new advances in areas like public transit. We also know that Harper is ideologically in tune with Washington’s aggressive policies in the world. He says now – during the election campaign — that he plans to withdraw Canadian combat troops from Afghanistan by 2011, because he knows how unpopular the war is with Canadians. But, with a majority, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he changed his mind – arguing that circumstances had changed, that creating a secure Afghanistan is necessary for our own security, that the women of Afghanistan need our help, etc., etc. etc. We all know the rhetoric by now.

James: With Canada’s serious poverty problem, if you were prime minister, what economic policies would you put into effect and which policies of previous governments would you revoke to change this situation?

Linda: Well, I can tell you there would be a significant economic policy overhaul!

Perhaps it’s easiest just to say that I think we are seriously on the wrong course, in that we are moving ever closer to the U.S. economic model – that is, low-tax, small government — which is a disastrous one. Part of the problem here is that we’ve come to believe that the U.S. model is the only viable model in the global economy. But that is nonsense.

What is always overlooked is the far better European model, particularly the model of the Nordic countries. They have high taxes and large government – and they’ve ended up with far better social results. They have a wonderful range of supportive public programs – things we can’t even imagine here — free early childhood education programs, free dental care for children, free university tuition and expenses covered for all students. With their extensive social safety net, they’ve managed to virtually eliminate child poverty, and substantially reduce adult poverty.

But what is particularly striking about the Nordic model is that it’s also been very economically successful. This flies in the face of all the propaganda we hear all the time about the detrimental effect that taxes have on the economy. In fact, the Nordic countries have very high tax rates, but they also have extremely strong economic growth. They consistently rank in the top ten of “global competitiveness” as measured by the World Economic Forum in Geneva.

James: Explain what you would do about Afghanistan and the Canadian commitment of troops there.

Linda: I’d pull our combat troops out now. If NATO’s involvement over there could be transformed into a UN-led peacekeeping mission of some sort, then that would be a reasonable thing for Canada to be involved in. As it is currently operating, however, NATO’s mission is essentially a U.S.-led occupation of a foreign country, with dubious legality.

I say “dubious legality” because the original U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001 was not legal. Contrary to popular belief, it had not been authorized by the UN Security Council. What was authorized was very vague, and it was about bringing the perpetrators of 9/11 to justice. That is the language of extradition and criminal prosecution, not military invasion. (I go into this in more detail in my book, Holding the Bully’s Coat.) In any event, the point is that it was months after the invasion that the UN Security Council – under pressure from Washington – gave approval, retroactively, for the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan. In this sense, the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan is just like the invasion of Iraq – both were illegal under international law, but have been given approval retroactively by the UN Security Council, largely because Washington is a formidable power with enormous influence over the Security Council.

So the notion that Afghanistan is a “good war” while Iraq is a “bad war” is false. They both amount to U.S. occupations, with puppet governments installed to give an air of legitimacy. The reason Afghanistan is going so badly from NATO’s point of view – that the insurgents seem to be getting stronger – is that these sorts of wars of occupation are never really winnable. Regardless of the propaganda we hear all the time here, Canadian troops are regarded in Afghanistan as part of a foreign army of occupation. Foreign armies of occupation are never popular. Indeed, they provoke resistance in the population, particularly when they conduct air strikes that kill innocent civilians, as NATO does.

As for the argument that we shouldn’t leave because of our “commitment to NATO,” I think this is a ridiculous objection. First of all, NATO is run by the United States. The top military general in NATO has always been a U.S. general, who ultimately reports to the U.S. Commander in Chief (that is, the U.S. President). So NATO is really a front for the U.S. rather than a legitimate coalition of nations. Furthermore, we know that virtually all the nations of NATO don’t want to be involved in combat in Afghanistan, or at least the general public in these NATO nations are fiercely opposed to their countries being involved in combat over there. It is only because of the intense pressure from Washington that NATO nations – despite the unpopularity of the war with their own electorates – stay involved at all. Indeed, Washington has been using Canada to apply pressure to the other NATO countries to stay involved. So the notion that Canada is fighting in Afghanistan because of a “commitment to NATO” is a pretty specious concept. We are fighting in Afghanistan to please the United States, which is waging its “war on terror” as a way to extend its power in the world.

Finally, I’d just say that the stakes are so high – our soldiers killing Afghans and being killed – that there has to be an overwhelmingly strong case for war to continue our combat role over there. Clearly, there isn’t any such case for war. In fact, there is the opposite – a compellingly strong case for diplomacy and development, not war, in Afghanistan.

James: Let’s talk about Prime Ministerial style. In this image-driven age, polls indicate that people see Harper more than Dion as a leader. Any comment?

Linda: The concept of Harper as a leader is absurd, unless by leader you mean someone who looks resolute, talks tough and has a slightly nasty manner about him. That strikes me as being more bully than leader.

To me, leadership is about having the personal strength and skills to show people the way to a better way of doing things, to guide them to a better place than they might be able to get to on their own. This can be difficult to do, which is why real leadership is a rare and impressive quality.

Stephen Harper utterly lacks it, in that, first of all, he has no good idea of where this country should be going.

Take the issue of climate change, for instance. By any meaningful measure, this is one of the most important issues of our time – if not the most important and pressing. So any politician aspiring to a “leadership” role must have a serious plan about how to lead the country forward to deal with the climate change challenge.

Harper has no such plan. His plan for reducing greenhouse gas emissions simply involves reducing the “intensity” of emissions, without requiring that our overall emissions be reduced. This is nonsense, and does nothing to solve the problem.

Not only does he have no plan, but he has acted to obstruct others who do have serious plans and intentions to tackle the problem. For instance, he has blocked progress at international meetings on climate change. And now, in this election campaign, he is actively ridiculing Liberal leader Stephan Dion’s plan as dangerously risky.

I would argue that it is actually Dion who is showing some leadership, at least on this issue. It takes guts to propose a carbon tax – something that most serious observers believe is necessary and will eventually be implemented. There is always resistance to new ideas, particularly if they involve taxes. (Although Dion’s Green Shift also offers income tax reductions to compensate, particularly at the lower end.) It seems that Dion is going to lose the election, but at least he’s taken a principled stand – a key quality in leadership. For that matter, so have the other main party leaders – Jack Layton and Elizabeth May.

James: You have written that “Ottawa has proved highly co-operative with Washington’s desire to have access to our oil.” How locked in is Canada to American control of our resources and is it possible to regain or maintain some autonomous control of these?

Linda: Unfortunately, we have already given up an enormous degree of sovereignty over our energy. In signing NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement), we signed on to a section (605) that effectively prevents us from cutting back energy exports to the United States – even if we have serious energy shortages here in Canada. This was a very foolish and reckless thing to do. It’s striking that Mexico, which also has significant energy reserves, refused to agree to this section on the grounds that it compromised Mexico’s energy sovereignty. As a result Mexico was granted an exception. But Canada signed anyway!

Is it possible to change this? Well, it’s possible although not easy. It would involve revising NAFTA. And you can be sure that Washington would not readily agree to changing that section of NAFTA. It did strike me as amusing however when there was so much hand-wringing here over the fear that Barack Obama might re-open NAFTA. Re-opening NAFTA wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing! There is much to dislike in NAFTA.

Unfortunately, the Harper government is moving us further down the path of integration with the United States, through negotiation of the so-called Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). Energy is a key part of this. Harper talks about “North American energy security.” He has no concept of “Canadian” energy security. He believes in a North American energy market, where Canadian needs have no priority over American needs. This is an exceptionally good deal for the United States, since it is Canada that has the excess energy. It is our energy that will service both countries.

Of course, we make money selling energy to the United States. But we would be able to do this anyway, without committing ourselves to sell to them. My objection is not that we sell energy to the United States (although we should slow down oil sands developments). My objection is that we have signed a treaty, and plan to sign more treaties, that restrict our future control over our energy resources and what we do with them. Thus, we’ve failed to protect our own interests as a country, in the most fundamental way. That’s not only bad leadership. That’s downright stupid.

Posted in Interviews with Writers, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

INTERVIEW WITH INGRID NEWKIRK, FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT OF PETA

Another interview of a few years ago from my archives of writers and musicians, this time with Ingrid Newkirk, author of the recently published The PETA Practical Guide to Animal Rights: Simple Acts of Kindness to Help Animals in Trouble
………………………………………………………………………….

Hate mail, vegetarianism, vivisection, fur, rodeos, activism, euthanasia, neutering, ethics, and compassion: the daily life of the world’s best-known activist for animals, PETA’s controversial founder and president. Ingrid Newkirk is a celebrated animal rights activist who campaigns internationally, the author of numerous books, and the president and cofounder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the world’s largest animal rights organization. She was born in England and from age seven lived in India for eight years where she helped her mother, a volunteer with Mother Teresa. Several life-changing experiences after the age of twenty-one led Ingrid into a life of animal rights, vegetarianism, official service as a deputy sheriff and director of cruelty investigations, and ultimately the creation of PETA in 1980. For almost three decades, her impact on behalf of abused animals and their rights has been widespread and enormous. Like all active critics of the status quo whose ideas challenge long-held practices and thinking, she inspires controversy and is often criticized with vehemence, a subject with which we began this recent interview.

James Strecker: The HBO documentary, I Am an Animal, begins with your reading hate mail that you have received because of your work on behalf of animals. What is it about the writers of these letters, or about you for that matter, that inspires such uncontrollable rage in some people and makes them want to hurt you?

Ingrid Newkirk: I realize that they see me as the messenger and need to try to shoot me. The message doesn’t go down with them because it encroaches upon their lifestyle, their habits, the ugly things that give them guilty pleasures, and that I am calling them out on those dirty habits. They know that if they agree with the reasonable idea that animals feel pain and that as powerful beings we should be kind and not inflict it upon them when not necessary, they will have to stop eating and wearing and shooting animals and so on. They know that I am exposing them as cruel which is not the image of themselves they want. Tough, yes. Cool, yes. Cruel, no. I am about to blow their cover and change their lives and it makes them lash out. This is a purely defensive reaction to the truth, I believe.

JS: Food, scientific research, fashion, entertainment –I know that the horrors animals endure are endless in each of these industries. But could you clarify briefly what is it about each one that you are working to change. Let’s begin with food, since some people in Canada have recently died from eating Maple Leaf meats.

IN: PETA and I wish to change the very idea that animal flesh and excretions are food. Perhaps if you were starving in a wilderness and there was no plant matter, no nuts, no fruits, nothing else, and you came across a dead animal, you might eat the flesh to survive, as the passengers in the Andes did to their fellow passengers in that infamous case years ago. But, and I don’t mean to be Biblical here, the human body flourishes on every living seed, fruit, vegetable, legume, nut, pulse, grain and withers inside and out and becomes sick and diseased when it is fed flesh and milk and those cholesterol bombs, eggs.

JS: What about the scientific research industry? I’ve always been troubled by the carte blanche given to the scientific community and the lack of ethical accountability demanded of them.

IN: Science has achieved some useful and spectacular things, but animal experiments have not contributed at all to these gains as any honest medical historian will admit. The breakthroughs in medicine like anaesthesiology, sterilization, the new vaccines, have all come without animal use as animal use takes us in the wrong direction. The search for a magic pill to obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer, to name a few, allows people to ignore the cause of those diseases, i.e. their meat and dairy based diets and lack of exercise and fresh air, and yet the pills only abate symptoms. Animal experimentation isn’t science, it’s like witchcraft, the dark and dirty side to exploration for knowledge, and it is patently dishonest and a waste of resources. While human drug addicts go without treatment, the elderly go without adequate care, the blind have to make do unless they are rich, and so on, the government gives welfare handouts to animal experiments to blind, addict, and otherwise harm animals who, while like us in being able to experience pain, fear and the desire to get out of a metal cage, are unlike us physiologically in almost every way. Wonderful researchers like those at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (pcrm.org) conduct ethical research with human patients and make life-saving findings.

JS: It’s always seemed perverse to me that animals must suffer so people might wear some usually asinine fashions and cosmetics -and I read recently that fur might be becoming a popular item again. How’s it going on that front?

IN: Most kids today wouldn’t touch fur with a 10 foot pole. It is also no longer a luxury item. It is something prostitutes wear. We get tons of coats sent in from people who haven’t worn them in years, out of shame that they ever had them and are digging them out of storage to donate as wildlife bedding and for us to send to refugees in Afghanistan and Serbia for the winter. With the exception of bad boy designers who love to titillate and shock by putting whole animals on their models’ heads and so on, and some of hip-hop’s excesses, the biggest threat is really from China producing cheap fur that many people don’t even know is real fur. Because China is the biggest producer of fur (meaning the largest killer of animals for it), no matter what the label says (for fur that originates in China may be made into a garment or glove lining in Italy or Mexico), much of the fur on the shelves and racks of stores in North America – bits that you think are just a bit of fake around a coat cuff or jacket collar or made into a cat toy – is from real dogs and cats and other animals slaughtered in China. It’s quite frightening really!

JS: Toronto and our own Hamilton have each allowed a rodeo in the past year. So please explain to our citizens how animals suffer in rodeos and other forms of entertainment.

IN: We have a poster with a sexy Dallas cheerleader on it and the slogan, “No one likes an 8 second ride.” Well, that goes double if you have a strap cinched around your genitals, I’d imagine. I’ve inspected rodeos and seen what goes on behind the scenes, especially that electric shock prod that makes the “bucking broncho” buck just as he comes out of the shoot. One of the most pathetic events is goat roping or calf roping: these small animals, attached by a person on horseback armed with a lasso, get slammed to the ground at about 30 plus miles an hour, tearing their cartilage and their skin loose from their bones and causing massive hemorrhaging. They break limbs. All the animals with broken and chipped bones exist without pain relief, they are simply sent to the slaughter. The rodeo began when cowboys with nothing looked around, saw the animals and thought, “Hey, let’s make a game out of harassing them!” Today, you’d think a person would be embarrassed to amuse themselves in the same way, knowing what we know about animals’ feelings.

JS: Where does hunting fit in? Because the hunter risks nothing, it seems so gutless, yet we have this macho aura attached to an alleged sport that doesn’t allow one side to retaliate.

IN: You know it is just permission to be violent, to act out aggression, to feel big about yourself. I have to laugh seeing the trucks hunters drive and their bumper stickers. They are such obvious statements about the need to compensate. If you read hunting magazines, as an outsider, it is disturbing how they have to puff themselves up in the face of…a dove who weighs a few ounces, or a vegetarian grazing deer who can only flee when shot. I believe they all need urgently psychiatric counseling and looking after, I honestly do. Of course, recent studies have shown that some people’s brains do not develop the “empathy centre,” or “mirror neuron” necessary for them to feel empathy, and that means trouble for us all. I’d give hunters a wide berth and try to outlaw any such activity near your home, schools, anywhere living beings of any species congregate.

JS: In fact, let me quote last week’s Sunday Observer to you: “Paedophiles are increasingly targeting babies and children too young to speak…Police say the scale of the threat is ‘massive.’” It seems that one thing some humans seem to prefer, and this certainly proves true in all forms of animal abuse, is a helpless victim who won’t fight back, one whom they can torture and thus fulfill, without consequence, some sort of need in them. Your turn….

IN: Yes, of course. We see that with all the school shooters and serial killers, they first picked on animals, decapitating cats, shooting dogs with BB guns, hunting was their passion. The problem we are told is that no one stopped them early on. That’s why there must never be a shrug and “boys will be boys” attitude about cruelty to animals at an early age or any age.

JS: How do you compel members of our society to consider the ethical treatment of animals when many people prefer cliché to difficult truth, escape to encounter, easy simplification to complexity, conformity of all kinds to personal courage, and diversion to self-awareness?

IN: You can only do your best. We know society is besotted by sex, conflict and so on, so we use the scantily clad Lettuce Ladies, in the “mock fights” in which our bikini babes wrestle in tofu, etc., to carry the messages that a saner world would be one where we could discuss with people sensibly. That said, we have everything from scientific papers to billboards to speeches on DVD to peta.org and peta2.org for younger people with videos and recipes and freebies to replace dissection, leather, you name it, facts, the works, something for everyone. The important thing when you have a social cause is to keep plugging away, to try almost anything, to put up materials on bulletin boards, talk to people, people what they don’t know via your email.

JS: How do you get individual people to take on the ethical issues you present as personally relevant to themselves and significantly change their behaviour accordingly?

IN: You remind them that they say they believe that might doesn’t make right, that kindness is a virtue, that they care about the Earth and that there is no reason for them to lose control over their lives. I write books like Making Kind Choices, and PETA gives out videos and has massive resources it distributes.

JS: Speaking of clichés, India has a reputation as a spiritual country that reveres life, yet some of your own transforming experiences that made you an activist happened there when you witnessed cruelty to animals. What exactly happened and how did you change as a result?

IN: I grew up from the time I was 8 to 16 in India and saw hideous cruelty on the street, in the open, unlike here where it is hidden tidily away. I rescued dogs who were sorely abused, one whose mouth had been packed with mud and tied shut; bullocks who had sticks rammed up into their rectums to keep them moving when they were too tired to go another step but the pain moved them on. In India, where most of the leather you see in North America originates, the cruelty to cattle transported for slaughter, and in the slaughterhouses where dull knives are used to saw through their throats and even children participate, is beyond anything you can imagine. To say there is reverence for cows in India is true, but it is like saying Christianity forbids adultery and theft and rape and murder and so there is none of that in our countires.

JS: One could hypothesize many reasons why humans need to feel superior or special and thus free to use or abuse other forms of life. In my own experience, I’ve had native elders, academics, and followers of several religions tell me that “animals were created for man’s use.” Why is it so hard for people to see that they are one species among many and not as special as they pretend or assume?

IN: Of course, whites used to think and be proud to say so that blacks were made for their use and could be kept in chains; that they were dumb and unfeeling. People with disabilities were openly mocked on the street by educated people. The gentry lined up to see “freaks” in traveling shows. It’s the same ignorance and wish not to recognize that we are like them, the same fear that it will debase us to be like others. Just as many men panicked at the thought of women doctors because it would rob them of their superiority, at women voting, etc., so now many humans panic at the thought that they will be somehow no “better” than these others. It is demoralizing to them, reduces them in their own eyes, but very sad and silly, as history shows us so well.

JS: Man often puts himself on a pedestal of sorts as a creature of reason as compared with other animals who supposedly function by instinct alone. At the same time, this rational creature has contributed immensely to the ecological disasters we are about to face. I guess I am asking about the myth of human superiority and the assumption of reason as a human driving force.

IN: The rest of the animal kingdom lives on earth without despoiling it, we are the only animal who has taken a buzzsaw to our own nest. Look at Alaska, inhabited for millennia by billions of animals from tree frogs to bears and was pristine, now….
Nothing really to say except people need to open their eyes, stop consuming, take responsibility, or just carry on as they have and it will all be gone, gone, gone.

JS: PETA has been criticized for euthanizing animals for whom it could not find acceptable living conditions. Please clarify PETA’s position.

IN: I would rather euthanize any animal than put them on the street, give them to a slow death in research, “adopt” them out to “live” on a chain in a backyard with no companionship and no one noticing their illnesses, etc. We adopt animals out when we can, like all the little hurricane dogs, because people rallied, but usually we refer all placeable dogs and cats and other animals to shelters. We take in the broken, unadoptable, unsocialized, aged, diseased animals when people no longer want them, no one wants them, they are tired and worn down and sick and want only a peaceful release in the arms of a loving person. We deal with people who cannot afford the astronomical vet fee for euthanasia as well. But, we save more animals than almost anyone as we also run two mobile spay/neuter clinics for the indigent, and we pay for life-saving surgery for some guardians who do love their animals but who can’t truly afford to pay, and so on.

JS: I started to watch the documentary about you and PETA, and, like many, couldn’t handle the graphic footage of animals being tortured in labs and factories. Naturally I feel overwhelmed, naturally I feel guilty, because I do very little to stop this suffering. What would you say to me and others who feel as I do?

IN: I say you do not have to watch because you do things to ameliorate the suffering, to educate. But anyone who says, “I love my steak too much to watch,” must watch. It is for those who have altered their lives to reduce suffering who must compel others who haven’t to watch. You don’t have to watch, you have to show. Use the videos as an email signature, leave the peta.org site up on college computers, show them outside on the sidewalk when the circus comes to town or just any day you can. That is our job.

JS: You’re an atheist who shows repeated and active courage in your reverence for life while some people, on the other hand, use religion and spirituality as what seems a self-indulgent means of escape from ethical responsibility or as a justification for their own inertia. They say they are pursuing spiritual goals but at the same time do nothing about the cruelty in the world. Any comments?

IN: In my new book, One Can Make a Difference, the Dalai Lama says it best. He says that no matter what your religion, compassion should be your religion. To me, that’s the one that counts.

JS: Tell me about the purpose and progress of your spay and neuter program.

IN: You can’t cure homelessness for dogs and cats by finding this one home, and that one home. The flow of unwanteds is too enormous. We must cut the flow off at its source. That’s where the clinics come in. They are no to low cost. We spay about 30-60 animals a day, every day, and still can’t keep up. There need to be fleets and fleets of clinics. Meanwhile, we pour funds into begging people to spay and neuter their animals for the animals’ sake (it helps prevent cancers, frustration, etc) and also for theirs (puppies and kittens are hard to find homes for, they need shots and lots of care, there may be expensive complications for the mother during birth), and also for all the homeless animals in shelters because every home you fill by breeding a litter means that’s the same number of dogs or cats who will be killed because you took the places in homes they needed.

JS: You maintain that “animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment.” Are all people ultimately capable of getting your meaning here and changing as a result? What about those who can’t or won’t?

IN: There are still people who hate blacks, still people who only behave properly because society compels them to. We don’t need everyone to agree to change an atrocity, we just need to get the fence-sitters to understand the importance of justice for animals and come on over and join those of us who already believe that -then we have the majority.

JS: What matters most to you in life and in the world? How often do you find people who share your views?
IN: Being kind, being kind and being kind. Almost everyone in the world shares some of my views. Only sociopaths have no feelings, the rest of humanity cares about whatever they have been taught to care about, or what they have learned to expand their horizons to care about. When I was younger, although I thought I was kind, I was busy eating my way through the animal kingdom, I wore foxes and even had a huge squirrel coat, and I rode horses. I am grateful to all those who opened my eyes, got me to think about how I was conducting myself and how it did not comport with who I thought I was, opened my heart to the enormity of animal suffering, and showed me the wonderful options we have whenever we buy, eat, clothe or entertain ourselves. I probably have a long way to go but I would hate to have died as the old me.

JS: Because you are inspirational to many people, I wonder who inspires you to continue.

JS: The animals whose eyes show their pain, their hope, their despair, their love, their dependence on our actions. The lonely dogs who will this winter be left out in the freezing cold on their chains. The animals being skinned alive and looking up through their lashes in the Chinese fur markets. The chickens crying out and struggling to right themselves on the slaughter line. And the knowledge that if I can change, anyone can. I am inspired by the poet, Rabindranath Tagore, who wrote, “I slept and dreamt that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy.”

JS: Finally, Ingrid, when are you coming to speak in Hamilton?
One day, I hope!

Posted in Interviews with Writers, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SAUDI AUTHOR RAJA ALEM: AN INTERVIEW & A REVIEW

The following interview with Saudi author Raja Alem and a review of her latest book first appeared in 2008 in an alternative tabloid publication of limited circulation in Hamilton, Ontario. Ergo, both are reprinted here for a larger audience.

AN INTERVIEW WITH RAJA ALEM
By James Strecker

The Saudi Arabian author Raja Alem was born in Mecca and now lives in both Jedda and Paris. Her works include ten novels, two plays, biography, short stories, essays, literary journalism, writing for children, and collaborations with artists and photographers. She appears often on the international cultural and literary scene, especially to discuss and give workshops in women’s issues, children’s creativity, and links between east and west. She has received many awards in the Arab world and in Europe and one from UNESCO for creative achievement. With her sister, the artist Shadia Alem, she established and sponsored a Cultural Club & Recreation Center for the girls of Mecca, which was a pioneer step in enriching women’s knowledge and giving them space to exist creatively.

James Strecker: Raja, you have travelled a great deal internationally, so I’d like to know what there is about the Arabic mind, as revealed in your novel My Thousand & One Nights, that you feel we, in the West, might not readily understand.

Raja Alem: First of all, I don’t think of mind as Arabic or American or European, but instead as one universal mind in various stages of awareness. However, I do think the main difference in our approach to life is that some of us in the East are always addressing the afterlife which is deep in our unconsciousness. The West, on the other hand, is mostly dedicated to involvement in this one life. Maybe this makes us regard suffering as a road, while others see it as an end, and this affects our way of creation or our goal in creation. In any case, some in both East and West value a breaking through to Godly levels on earth, a moving to no limitation in artistic experiments, while others tend to move timidly, considering an outer power which is in control. It depends on personal experience: some work as God on earth and some work as allies with God in heaven.
In some of the Western experiments I have come to know, they are mostly in control of the plots and solutions more than some of us here; we seek power in the invisible while they leave nothing invisible.

JS: I’ve read that you are highly regarded as a writer in the Arabic world. Why do you think this is so?

RA: Because I am possessed. I mean I am true to a message, reaching beyond the impossible, the seen, the known, even beyond death. Through writing about Mecca, the forbidden zone, of which I consider myself the only inheritor of its pagan legends and history, I free my characters from moving behind tabooed borders and bring this new vision to the world. Growing up as a child in Mecca, the center of this universal energy, where pilgrims of every culture and race annually gather with their wishes and dreams, I learnt to see myself as a particle within. I am part of a whole power and I write about a way of being which is greater in being open to transformation, moving between identities and cultures, eternally changing with every minute to reach a better understanding and a oneness with the world. I see the universe as one body and we are its parts -and through art we are discovering our endless body.

JS: Do you feel any restriction or limitation as a creative female in a culture that we understand to be male-dominated?

RA: From where I see our society, I look at both males and females as dominated. But writing was the one domain I moved in freely because, when I write, I am attached to some energy above physical forms and thus I am no more a female nor a male. In fact, when I sent my first manuscript to a publisher, his response came back with “Dear Mr. Alem….” I started publishing my literary articles in the Riyadh newspaper’s cultural pages, and I’ve been respected as an intellectual ever since. As to my books, I published them outside Saudi Arabia, in Lebanon, the real arena for culture. Up until two years ago, my books were not allowed in Saudi Arabia, but they were widely read. But I think one creates one’s own limitations. I mean, it’s your decision to allow or not allow any authority to exist in the moment of creation. The moment of creation is supposed to be free of any restriction.

JS: What do you find most difficult about writing in English?

RA: Not knowing how I sound. And the fact that I can’t give the equal flavor to Arabic jargon words, tastes, beliefs. In writing about some dances and songs –which are sometimes sources of healing- I can’t find their equal even now in our own culture, since they tend to disappear. But, since I work with an English-speaking collaborator, the language of my English books is not really mine. If it was my own language, a word or a sentence would tell the reader who I am, because in Arabic there is real magic. But in English, I can’t tell if we succeeded in conveying the mixture of ancient and ultra modern tongues and visions and I am afraid that in English I might sound medieval in style. But English did somehow liberate me as a writer. I discovered that it’s easier to spell the taboos in another tongue because you don’t feel the files, the archives, attached to every word, although I am not at all inhibited writing in Arabic and I do tackle the taboos. English, in the end, has made my writing less magical, more human and earthy, but, no matter what the limitations English puts in my way, it helps me strip to my bones as a living body.

JS: I enjoyed your novel very much and wonder what you, as its creator, like about it.

RA: I am more like a hunter than a creator here, with My Thousand & One Nights, since it involves the capturing of a real life, a biography of my family in Mecca. I try to capture the smells of childhood, of peace, and pigeons flying in circles around God’s home. Do you know how it feels to grow up in a place where they tell you it is God’s home? We were playing in His courtyard, drinking His magical zamzam water, and my grandfather was the Sheikh of its carriers, the distributor of this magical water. I grew up with that. I write about that.

My Thousand & One Nights
A Novel of Mecca
By Raja Alem & Tom McDonough
Syracuse University Press
$24.95

Reviewed by James Strecker

Raja Alem’s second novel in English, My Thousand & One nights, claims many authors. The first are an Arabic tradition and culture that inspire Alem’s muse to create a slew of dramatis personae who are ripe with complex idiosyncrasies. They are usually Arabic women, a subject I, like many, know mostly through media simplifications and Hollywood clichés. The next author is the Saudi novelist herself, instinctively adept at negotiating the simultaneous truths of mundane human life and other dimensions inhabited by genies, “Underworldlings” and supposedly inanimate objects that assume living personalities.

Then we have Alem’s collaborator Tom McDonough who, with an admittedly impossible task of translating one culture and one sex into another, has reworked the author’s original version, composed in English as a learned language, into a rendering more aesthetically digestible in the West. Next, within the tale itself, is Zohr the narrator, a modern Scheharazade who seduces us with girlish enthusiasm and eager commentary from within the world of women. We remain entranced as each short chapter unfolds; there are 79 chapters in 269 pages and we hunger for each new tale.

Thus seduced, the final author down the line is inevitably the reader. True to the oral tradition which informs Alem’s style, the modern reader interprets the storyteller’s reality according to the workings of his or her piqued imagination and, thus committed, participates in each story. Alem, who writes with an exquisite ink of sensuality, would have it so, since storytelling is an intimate experience of shared creation. Her narrator declares, “Open to me now, infidel friend, kaffir, faithless reader, as I am opening to you.” For Alem, there’s no holding back, especially in the creation of a newer reality.

The book’s subject is the narrator’s aunt, the ever intriguing Jummo. She’s a woman of laughter, raunchy jokes, and jangling bracelets, a woman of “candor and fearlessness in confrontation” whose most intimate relationship is with Sidi Wahdana, a spirit harbinger of death whose various manifestations turn out to be Jummo’s raison d’etre. Sidi comes to Jummo “in every conceivable shape” and before he ultimately leads her to understand that “nothing is so alive (as death),” Sidi guides her with Sufi-friendly utterances like, “I am He –if you like. And if you don’t like, I’m not He.” The richly conceived women in Alem’s novel usually understand such forays into enigma, while a male, even the family patriarch Sheik al-Baikwaly, remains one in whom no one ever finds “any hard evidence of magical literacy.”

Within a style that flows with the fluid logic of a dream, a style that weaves its magic not so much through the continuum of narrative as a gradual accumulation of impressions, My Thousand & One Nights suggests an underpinning of autobiography, one that is affectionately anchored in the physical and psychic lives of women of Mecca where Alem was born. This city, on the verge of modernization, is of the present and still decidedly medieval. Rams are sacrificed and old beliefs -“a girl could get pregnant just by being looked at” or “if a bird pooped on her shadow” -inform everyday life. In need of counsel, people heed “contradictory stars, disorderly entrails, and other auguries.” No doubt, the assertion “The people of Mecca are made of the same stuff as their mountains” confirms a Mecca citizen’s place in timelessness and is mystically taken for fact.

Yet for all its compelling otherworldliness, its flexible realities and cultural revelation, Alem’s novel is happily much more. It is also a serious and poetic meditation on the nature of mortality and the appropriation of death into the consciousness of everyday life. These characters commute regularly to dimensions unconfined by this world and, for Alem, we don’t die but continue in other forms. If Jummo realizes that “Nothing keeps as busy as death. Nothing is so alive.” it is because Sidi has taught her, “There is no living except in the everlasting flood.” In essence, we have no need to transcend death because, in the greater scheme of things, we accommodate it as we live in various forms.

So what is real and what is fancy? For Alem, no riff on what we take for reality is inconceivable and any excursion of imagination creates a new and valid dimension of existence. Thus, she is stating a literal fact when she writes: “A delegation of geniis lay in wait for Hannah in her dreams. They captured her and escorted her to one of their underwater palaces.” It is also fact that Jummo is “betrothed to the Unseen” and that “Jummo has developed “a knack for seeing invisible creatures…wandering around the house.” This is Jummo for whom “angels appear in the wink of an eye.”

In Alem’s world, any incident, any thought, any word is potent with further possibility since imagination is all. If Sheik Baikwaly, for one, believed that “every star had a name, every name had a spirit (and) every letter of every name had a spirit too,” he later finds that “the spirits –the inner energy- oozed out of the names and took the shape of dazzling stars.” In this world, Zamzam, the sacred water drawn from the well of Mecca’s Grand Mosque, “is for whatever you drink it for” and meanings and identities can change at a storyteller’s whim. Alem’s novel, then, is a celebration of the potency of language as the basis of freedom and fulfilled existence.

My Thousand & One Nights also provides a female-favouring and playful assessment of the nuanced contest for power between men and women. In this patriarchal culture, it is women, ironically, who seem to win. For her young love Mayjan, we read that “Jummo was like a hawk; she never missed her prey, and her talent for teasing the mortal limits of Mayjan’s senses was masterful.” In turn, “the more Jummo delves into the secrets of Mayjan’s name, the more he feels imprisoned (and) Jummo’s hold on his name becomes dangerous.” Of Jummo’s husband from whom she is soon divorced, we read a dismissal that al-Neyabi is “of no astrological consequence whatsoever.” Jummo later complains “He can’t even get my fire started. His body is blind and deaf and dumb. He doesn’t feel a thing.” But, in fact, who needs really needs men? After all, Jummo concludes that ““Scheherazade didn’t so much mate with her husband Shabrayar as with her true self, her animal self.”

Both Raja Alem and her novel are highly esteemed in the Arabic world partly because, one suspects, readers there readily savour the resonance of both ambiguity and enigma and accept Sidi’s premise, “Behind every veil, another veil.” Readers in the West will derive great pleasure here in proportion to their ability, like Jummo’s, to “surrender every surrenderable thing” as they consume, with their senses open, the author’s poetic prose. They will find that Alem doesn’t actually write; she dances like a conjurer in front of you and at some point she becomes her words and their letters that you see. Myself, I often recalled, while in Alem’s world, a remark by depth psychologist Ira Progoff when I was working with him in New York years ago: “Sometimes our reality is as real as our dreams.”

Posted in Interviews with Writers, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

THE BILLY BRAGG INTERVIEW PARTS I & II

The following interview first appeared in 2008 in an alternative tabloid publication of limited circulation in Hamilton, Ontario. Since Billy Bragg will be appearing at the Danforth Music Hall in Toronto on May 3, here’s the interview again for those who missed it the first time.
………………………………………………………………………………..
In the early eighties, Billy Bragg, from Essex, England, began recording a unique hybrid of punk outrage, socially-concerned protest inspired by the Woody Guthrie-Bob Dylan template, and folk tradition. Over time, in his albums, he has balanced songs of leftist politics and of love and relationships, both written with consummate imagination. His lyrics are at one time wry and witty, sincere and uncompromising, sharply intelligent and humane, rich with detail and compact, while his accomplished knack for catchy melody has produced consistently memorable tunes. Long a chart-habitue in Britain and a widely-popular cult figure in North America, Bragg is also an author, an unstoppable leftist and anti-war/pro-peace activist, a family man, and always an outspoken and inspired social and political critic. We spoke at the CBC in Toronto..

James Strecker: You write both personal songs and political songs, and I wonder if the two overlap.

Billy Bragg : In the best songs, the personal and the political overlap because life overlaps. The ones I’m most proud of are where a successful story has a political message. Or sometimes you can use them either way. I have song called “I Keep Faith” which is both a love song and a song of commitment to humanity. The commitment is through my ongoing belief and faith in the audience’s ability to change the world, rather than me change the world. Singing a song can’t change the world, it can just offer you a different perspective of the world. But the audience, through their collective action, can make a difference and my job is to remind them of that and inspire them to go out a do the stuff that makes a difference. In “I Keep Faith” it’s how I pitch it to them that makes a difference, using the intro of the song to set the song up in a way that is unambiguously focused on what I want it to be, whether it’s the personal or the political.

JS: Because of your song The Lonesome Death of Rachel Corrie, you’ve been criticized and called a “mate of the terrorists” by someone on the internet. Any comment on criticism?

BB: Well, they will, particularly on the issue of Israel-Palestine. If you don’t agree with the Zionists, therefore you are a terrorist, or if you don’t agree with the Americans who agree with the Zioniists, therefore you must be a terrorist, but that doesn’t mean you can’t make your point. Those people are trying to close you down, trying to stop you from making your point, trying to undermine the legitimacy of what Rachel Corrie was trying to achieve. They’re trying to obscure the murderous intent of the driver of that bulldozer. They can call me any names they like, but, in the end, you’ve got to try to bring the news from nowhere to somewhere and that’s what I try to do. Criticism doesn’t particularly bother me. It didn’t back then or now. You know, if people aren’t getting upset by the songs you write, you’re probably not writing the right kind of songs.

JS: You say “I prefer it all to be open” in the song “Sexuality” and I remember Jeremy Irons telling me about the film he’d been in, Lolita, and how people didn’t want to address the fact of an adult’s attraction to a young girl. So what are the current unsaids in society?

BB: Well, that’s the key one – isn’t it? – pedophilia. It’s an issue people don’t address and don’t feel comfortable talking about. The song “Sexuality” was really a post aids anthem to make people understand about practicing safe sex and not stigmatizing the gay community as social lepers because of the problems of HIV. I do try to work with marginalized people and I did a songwriting workshop with a bunch of terminally ill women in a hospice in Weymouth, writing songs with them and trying to help them say the things they couldn’t say around the dinner table, which were namely, “I love you but I’m dying.” That was very inspirational, working with them. My own father died of cancer thirty years ago and the process the doctors encouraged us to do at the time, the “best way to deal with it,” was not to talk about it. So we didn’t say any of those things we should have said. We just sat around while dad kind of withered away and I really regret that. So working with these women seemed a way to help them to overcome that difficult silence.

JS: Do songs help those who do not speak of things like death and dying?

BB: Songs give legitimacy to whatever it is you want to say. I also do work in prisons and last year I set up a fund to raise money to buy guitars for people doing rehabilitation work in prisons, but writing songs does legitimize people’s experience in a way that other things don’t and it’s simple and easily communicable. You put a beat to it and rhythm and a rhyme, and it goes straight into your heart immediately and you can’t forget it. That’s why I’m songwriter, rather than a novelist or straight forward poet.

JS: What do you do about an apathetic society in which people take in what is said on television news shows which are owned by the corporations. Can songs penetrate that situation?

BB: Songs can offer you a different perspective, that’s the most they can do. People don’t always want a different perspective, so you’ve got to make them note it whether they want it or not. A couple of years ago I started writing songs about the politics of identity and a lot of left wing people don’t like that. They are not interested in discussing an inclusive sense of identity. They believe in internationalism and any form of nationalism or patriotism is an anathema to them. But there are as many types of patriotism as there are types of socialism and we ignore them at our peril, because, if we don’t talk about these things, we leave a vacuum which is easily filled by the far right. So we need to take that ground.

JS: How much flexibility do you need within the left wing to accommodate divergent points of view, yet not dissipate its integrity?

BB: That’s a difficult one because we live in a post-ideological period at the moment and people are trying to articulate these things in ways that accommodate where we are rather than constantly hearkening back to Marxism. I think the energy of Marxism is more or less shot. But the ideas that Marx was trying to deal with have not been resolved, so we have got to find a new language, and poets and songwriters can play a part in that. All great art has the potential to accommodate a new sense of identity, but the problem is that identity is personal and, rather than talking in blanket terms, you have to focus on what it is that makes you feel that connects you with the place where you are from. I’m talking about your sense of belonging and that’s what society seems to miss these days. So I do believe in family and my life is really shaped around my family activities, the length of time I go away on tour, when I make my albums, and what songs I write. They’re trying to reflect the family life I live.

JS: The first time I knew about you was when I heard you sing The World Turned Upside Down, one of my fave songs and it’s on Dick Gaughan’s album, and I thought “He’s playing solo electric guitar, it’s folkish music, what the hell’s going on?” And now you’re part of The Imagined Village, a group that updates performance of traditional songs, so innovation is part of the game?

BB: If you want to move the game forward, yeh. If you want to be sort of stuck in aspic, then it’s not innovation and you want to go backwards. But those of us who want to broaden the idea of what English folk music can be want to bust out of the idea that if you play solo guitar you have to be an acoustic guitar player. You’ve got to zig when everybody else is zagging. Of course, you do have to make a few compromises here and there because, if you make no compromises, things become rather precious or brittle. But as soon as you make compromises on your terms, you’re probably all right. That means you have to make sure that you are comfortable with the things they want to do rather than acquiescing to things you don’t feel are you. And I’ve had my fights with the record company. They tended to win the little ones about which single to put out from the album and I tended to win the big one like who owns the back catalogue -and I own all of my back catalogue. It’s very important for young artists to understand they shouldn’t sign their rights away for life for copyright.

JS: You have written “We can be what we want to be.” So what is it that prevents us, from doing so, because it is a tricky place between societal pressure and our own inability to do something?”

BB: Our sense that how others might see us, the urge to conform, is strong because we don’t want to stick out, we don’t want to draw attention to ourselves, we don’t want to be talked about. It’s something inculcated at school, that period of eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen when you want to look exactly the norm and you want to be right in the middle of that. But the norm moves about and every now and then the norm rushes ahead of where the mainstream is, as in punk. So if you’re fortunate to have been liberated from your worries about how people see you, then you have the opportunity to become a genuine individual.

THE BILLY BRAGG INTERVIEW PART II

In Part II of The Billy Bragg Interview, the popular protest singer talks about his Woody Guthrie albums, his approach to writing songs, his explorations of English identity, his influences, and America today.

JS: How difficult was it writing songs with Woody Guthrie’s words -or was it easy for you to do?

BB: There was some worry about the legend of Woody Guthrie and how people would feel if we did stuff that was contrary to it. But Nora, Guthrie’s daughter, specifically wanted us to do stuff that was different, she wanted us to choose songs that challenged people’s perception of Woody, that added a third dimension to that two dimensional figure of a dust bowl icon. So I was worried that, with some of the lyrics we chose, hard core Woody Guthrie fans might find it difficult to reconcile with their iconic image of him. And Nora helpfully said, “Don’t worry about the legend, I’ll deal with the legend and you just tune into the voice in the archives” and that kind of gave me license to do whatever I wanted to do. I did feel a sense of connection with him and that happened when we recorded a song called “Another Man’s Done Gone” in Dublin. In fact Nora chose that song. She brought that lyric, and I wrote the music for that, and Jay Bennett played it on the piano, and Jeff Tweedy sung it, and so the four component parts of the project were there, me Jeff and Jerry and Nora. And it’s the one song where Woody refers to the lyrics and he talks about “I feel like this scribbling might stay.” It was recorded in a two hour period and it seemed to me that we actually in some way connected with him in that moment. Nora sat in the room with us when we recorded it and at that moment I thought this is when we actually touch base with the little guy. Now I don’t think my accent would have worked with his words, and I really had to put on a bit of that mid-Atlantic thing just to connect with Woody. It would have sounded very odd singing in my voice “I live in a place called Oklahoma.” I needed to modulate toward the middle of the Atlantic and that wasn’t a bad thing, I wasn’t selling out by doing that. And in the songs that we write and the causes we support, both Woody and I, it was sort of a way of approaching politics that isn’t dogmatic and a way of approaching songwriting that’s entertaining and engaging people, rather than lecturing them. Nora said that Woody talked a lot and played little and I can do that sometimes. I get in trouble for that.

JS: Tell me about any experience of writer’s block you’ve had.

BB: If I’ve got something to write, I write, but then when I was writing my book, I didn’t write anything for ages and I couldn’t really write any songs till I finished writing the book. Once I finished writing the book, the songs just came. Every sound check I would plug the guitar in and I’d write another song. The book took two or three years, eighteen months of tossing it about and eighteen months of doing it. There were no songs and it was like a big block in the way and I just kind of chipped away at it to fragment it.

JS: Some of your songs nail a subject and some leave a lingering ambiguity.

BB: That’s not a bad thing to have ambiguity sometimes and help people fill in the gaps, particularly in relationship songs. There’s a lot of ambiguity in relationships, a lot of unsaid things, but I try and keep the ambiguity in the love songs and keep the political songs a bit clearer and straight forward so you know exactly what I’m saying.

JS: In your book, you discuss a sense of English identity.

BB: In my book I’m trying to explore how the first feelings I had about Englishness were engendered by “Scarborough Fair” by Simon and Garfunkel. Now Martin Carthy, my countryman, was playing that song from my culture about two miles from my house around that time, so why couldn’t I get my culture from Martin? Why did it take two Jewish guys from Queens and Bob Dylan’s backing band to give me my own culture? Now I’m exploring how that process works and, most significantly, I see it in the work of Bob Dylan and his use of the British folk tradition to upgrade his songwriting by taking an old English song “Lord Randall” which says “Where have you been Lord Randall my son, Where have you been my darling young one” and turning it into “A Hard Rain’s Gonna Fall.” That alchemy was so revolutionary and people like Martin Carthy were blown away not just by the song, but by the content and the imagery and what Dylan had done in taking this old tune and then totally revamped it. And as soon as he recorded that, Dylan went to England and got a lot more folksongs of people like Martin and came back and wrote some songs that were based on English folksongs. So it’s back and forth, because my own culture is here in Canada and in the US too. That’s what’s part of my culture as well because that’s what I’ve listened to and there’s a sort of feeling loop that pushes and pulls and comes and goes. There’s North American survivors –in Appalachia and Newfoundland, and there’s the Irish and the Cornish and the Scots down through the centre of Canada, and you get to the very edge of the continent in Victoria and you find mods running around on scooters listening to The Who.

JS: Who were significant influences on you? I imagine there are fifty thousand.

BB: There are a lot, yeh, but two of the biggest influences were The Clash and Bob Dylan. And, of course, Joe Strummer, before he called himself Joe Strummer, referred to himself as Woody, because he was influenced by Woody Guthrie and that’s why The Clash wrote slogans on their guitars. So both Dylan and Strummer were influenced by Woody, so he’s the father of my political song tradition. He was pretty cool. He sang “Gypsy Davy,” which is a song he learned from his grandmother, and when Childe went to collect those ballads in Appalachia, it was “Gypsy Davy” or the “Raggle Taggle Gypsies,” or whatever you wanted to call that song, that had the most variants. So with Woody singing that in Oklahoma in the 20s and 30s, there’s an argument to be made there that he was the very last of the Elizabethan balladeers, since that song was first written down in Jacobean England and it must have been old then. The same time he writes “This Land is Your Land” as an alternative to a song he keeps hearing on the jukebox that was all over America in 1940 called “Bless America.” He writes “This Land Is Your Land” and originally the punch line is “God blessed America for you and me” which he changed to “This land is made for you and me.” The point is that he’s trying to be an alternative musician, so he’s kinda like the first punk rocker as well. He covers a lot of bases that little guy, he really does.

JS: What about existential validation, feeling that you mean something through doing your music?

BB: Yeh, that’s a really important part of what I do. For the first few years I really didn’t feel as if I existed unless I was doing gigs, but I don’t feel that way now. But after twenty five years of just not being able to do it, to then have the ability to do it, the urge to go out and do it was very, very strong. I do what I always wanted to do and I get paid to do it, how fucking great is that? That’s the definition of success. And now I’ve also got a little balance in my life, I’ve got a family and other things.

JS: Some years ago you wrote a line, “If America is truly the beacon of freedom…” and I wonder what America is to you now.

BB: I have two words to say: black president. Say it: black president. The idea of it is exciting, is engaging I think the Americans are going to surprise us this November. For the first time since the war more, than half of them are going to vote in the election. I have a lot of respect for the American people. Where I come from there’s too much knee jerk anti-Americanism that doesn’t take on board that vast numbers of Americans are appalled by George Bush as we are and we need to recognize that and support those American who want their country to be a force for good in the world, rather than a force of destruction. If you’re looking for a sign to say the Bush years are over, nominating a black man for the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate is a pretty clear message. I think that politics do matter, that grass roots politics matter. Ultimately our biggest enemy in making a better world isn’t capitalism or conservatism, it’s cynicism and we have to be vigilant against our own cynicism all the time because our enemies rely on us thinking we can’t do this, it’s too long, it’s just me, it’s a little big. That cynicism is what defeats people who want to make a better world, so we have to fight against that.

Posted in Interviews from Music, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

PETER OLESKEVICH CONDUCTS OPERA HAMILTON’S LES PECHEURS DE PERLES -MARCH 9, 12, 14, 16

Usually, in order to interview a conductor, an artistic administrator, a chorus master, a university teacher of conducting, a photographer (see www.pjophotography.com ) and a promoter of the arts, one would need to have a coffee or equivalent with six different people. Recently I encountered a combination of all six roles in one person, Peter Oleskevich, an impressively versatile and dedicated cornerstone for twenty-five years of Opera Hamilton. Although Peter provided insights on many subjects, which we touched on briefly, the matter at hand was Opera Hamilton’s upcoming production of Bizet’s Les Pecheurs de Perles or, if your preference is English tea and not French café noir, The Pearl Fishers. The opera, which is not performed that often, runs for four performances on March 9 at 7:30, 12 at 8:00, 14 at 8:00, and 16 at 2 at the Dofasco Centre for the Arts in Hamilton. And now the interview:

James Strecker: I must ask you this right off the bat. I’ve been to only one concert in the Musikverein in Vienna, which is considered acoustically one of the best concert halls in the world, and you have conducted there on several occasions, I believe. Was there anything that made these performances special for you?

Peter Oleskevich: Unfortunately it was only one performance that I conducted in the Musikverein and probably not the one you attended. Indeed the acoustics are superb. There is a quality to the sound that is lush yet transparent. No matter how loud it gets, one can always hear the details. Creating music on that stage, it becomes easy to understand why the Vienna Philharmonic has such a special sound. There is also an aura that one becomes aware of, knowing that so many of the finest musicians from the last couple of centuries have performed there. I was very fortunate to use the library at the Musikverein, where I was able to peruse the original performance parts of Beethoven’s Eroica Symphony. Holding the parts that Beethoven himself had corrected (with bright colours, I might add), was a moment I’ll never forget.

JS: Do you support the once often enough stated view that European musicans and North American musicians are different in their approach to the music they play, with North Americans leaning more to technical brilliance and Europeans more toward an expression of the nuances of feeling?

PO: I don’t know if I’d agree with such a broad statement. Perhaps it might have been the case a few generations ago, but because we now live in a global village and are exposed to all cultures, I believe excellent musicians strive to balance their skills. I recall that as a post graduate student in Vienna, I discovered how difficult it really was to interpret even a simple Mozartian phrase. To do this, one needed the proper technical skills as well as musical sensitivities. In this cast of the Pearl Fishers we have four outstanding singers from North America and I would challenge anyone to say that they have less expression than a European. Technical skills are a given these days.

JS: We must talk about your hat collection, since you wear so many. With Opera Hamilton, you are Artistic Administrator, Assistant Conductor, and Chorus Master. You are also a photographer with many dramatically evocative photos of scenes from operas to your credit. You are also a teacher of conducting and a promoter of classical music to young students. Could you tell us about the satisfactions and difficulties you have faced in each of these roles?

PO: In a smaller musical organization like Opera Hamilton, it’s necessary to have a diverse skill set. Everyone in the company does more than just one thing. In fact I like doing different things and I know I’d get bored very quickly if I did the same thing repeatedly. I also like to interact with people and most of these tasks allow me to do so. I love teaching and working with children. Of course, my two passions of performing and photography give me the greatest energy, and opera gives me the opportunity to do both. Now if only I could figure out how to take pictures while I conduct….

JS: Since you’ll be conducting Les Pecheurs de Perles for Opera Hamilton next week, please tell us how the opera shows signs of compositional sophistication and how, at the same time, it also shows signs of being the work of a young twenty-five year old , albeit one who would ultimately become the composer of Carmen.

PO: Wow, where do I begin? First of all, I love this opera. In trying to evoke the Ceylon of centuries past, Bizet writes in a quasi modal style with tempo markings like Allegro feroce, which might be less sophisticated, but very effective. Everyone knows the famous tenor and baritone duet, but there are a few other arias and duets that are very mature in expressing the human condition and are musical gems. An interesting example is the Chorus hymn “Brahma, divin Brahma” that comes in Act I and at the end of Act II. It is exactly the same musically, but in Act I, everyone is happy and praising Brahma, yet in Act II they are desperately seeking Brahma’s appeasement for their transgression. This difference leads me to see the tempo and interpretation very differently, even though it’s exactly the same music.

JS: The libretto has been maligned right from the first production on several grounds, so I wonder, first of all, how you feel about the libretto in general and, second, if it presents any specific problems for you and your singers.

PO: The libretto is not problematic for me. I take things at face value and make the best of them. In this case, the stage director and singers have spent a great deal of time discussing the inner thoughts and motivations of the characters, and have found a great depth to the characters and what drives them to do what they do. We decided to go with the tragic ending (there is a version with a happy ending) and in so doing, see a man rise above his own needs by sacrificing himself.

JS: Speaking of singers, what distinct contribution does each member of your cast bring to this production? Does Bizet require any specific idiomatic savoir faire and, if so, how do your singers fare with this requirement?

PO: Let me say that I feel privileged to be working with singers of this calibre and sensitivity. Virginia Hatfield, Edgar Ernesto Ramirez, Brett Polegato and Stephen Hegedus all come with a great deal of experience and are able to interpret Bizet’s characters musically, emotionally and stylistically. They are all fine actors who continue to explore the nuances of the roles they are portraying. To this list of stars I must include the stage director, the accompanist, the supernumeraries and of course, the chorus.

JS: What challenges do you feel as the conductor when you encounter Bizet’s score? Do you experience any difficulties with a score whose autograph copy has been lost and which has been reconstructed? Have you made any alterations for this production?

PO: The challenges with this score are no different than any other music I learn and perform. I want to get to the root of what the composer is trying to portray, using my own life experience to understand it, without actually getting in the way of it. Unfortunately, French scores are notorious for being inaccurate and badly printed, so a lot of time is spent just “filling in the blanks”. Not having a scholarly edition on which to draw is a little frustrating. We have cut some of the music, but in each case it is to further the dramatic tension, and to eliminate a complete repeat of a section (which was done as a convention in French theatre).

JS: As much as I’ve been in awe of Carmen since I was a child, I’m surprised that Les Pecheurs de Perles is an opera I have not seen live for some reason -and this is Opera Hamilton’s second go at it in eleven years too! So, first of all, why did you choose to schedule it again? Then, I wonder, are there any operas that don’t get produced as often as, say, Boheme, that you would love to conduct and why would you pick these specific operas?

PO: Dramatically, this opera has a lot going for it. Add to this a lot of beautiful music, an exotic locale, a love story and tragedy, and you have a good evening of entertainment. Carmen is done very often and deservedly so. On the ledger, The Pearl Fishers is less expensive to produce because there are only four characters and it’s important in these difficult economic times to be mindful of that. I have always been drawn to things off the beaten track. Cherubini is someone I’d like to explore (Beethoven considered him to be the most dramatic composer of his time) and perhaps someone like Martin y Soler (who Mozart quotes in Don Giovanni).

JS: You have conducted La Boheme, Die Zauberflöte, L’elisir d’amore, Die Fledermaus, Eine Nacht in Venedig by Strauss, Die Csárdásfürstin by the Hungarian Kalman, and My Fair Lady. Each one, no doubt, offers distinct pleasures to a conductor as he collaborates with both musicians and singers, so could you tell us what special pleasures you experienced in these productions?

PO: I’ve also conducted other musicals, and all of these different styles and expressions satisfy my thirst for diversity. I love tasting new foods and music is no different. The singers and artistic collaborators all bring their own life experiences to the mix. It’s a veritable feast and I am fortunate to be at the table.

JS: The duet Au Fond du Temple Saint reaches deep into one’s heart and its popularity in aria recitals seems to be on the level of Nessun Dorma or Va Pensiero, so how do you as a conductor manage to keep it integrated in the production while at the same time knowing that voices behind you will be singing along? Will you be singing along?

PO: This duet has become very famous, and justifiably so. I always sing along (under my breath of course). I can’t help it and I secretly wish that the audience would sing along too. But, in the context of the opera and in the way Brett Polegato and Edgar Ernesto Ramirez are interpreting it, this duet is elevated far beyond the “party piece” that it normally is.

JS: You have been with Opera Hamilton for twenty-five years, so would you care to reminisce and tell us about maybe half a dozen or so highlights that remain with you?

PO:Now that’s a tall order. Twenty-five years distilled down to a half dozen memories. Hmmm. How about all the extraordinary people who came and shared their artistry, or all the dedicated chorus members who love to sing, Renée Fleming and Maureen O’Flynn in the Letter Writing duet from Figaro, the Steel City Don Giovanni, the Otello, where the curtain refused to open but the chorus sang their hearts out without seeing the conductor?

JS: On a personal note, one can find you exploring your Ukrainian heritage on line and I remember in the sixties that recordings of Ukrainian operas were becoming available in North America as imports, so I wonder if you have explored this repertoire in some way.

PO: Unfortunately I have not had the time to research these works. An interesting aside to my Ukrainian heritage is that my mother, although born in Ukraine, was German. I have discovered that she was born in a village some 50kms away from the Mennonite settlements where the ancestors of many Canadian opera singers originated from. Russell Braun, Ted Baerg, Peter Wiens, Anita Krause and Greg Dahl come to mind. There must have been something in the drinking water that led us all down the opera path.

JS: I’ve read that the recent death of a childhood friend caused you to reconsider various aspects of your very busy life and what is most important to you in it. If you don’t mind, could you say a few words on this turning point in your life and its impact?

PO: In fact three major things happened to me within a six month period that stopped me in my tracks and made me completely reevaluate my life. We become so caught up in the everyday things that we lose sight of the most important things. These events brought a clear focus to what’s important to me: health, happiness, family and friends. I even started up a small photography business on the side. My father passed away a couple of months ago and this only reinforced my focus.

JS: What do you plan to be doing for the next five or so years?

PO: Short answer: not sure. Long answer: I’d like to do more of the things I love, but perhaps in a better balance – a little performing, photography, teaching and spreading the good word about the art form that I love.

JS: Two final questions. What advice would you give to young singers and to young musicians would wish to pursue careers in classical music?

PO: Work hard. Particularly for those who are blessed with a lot of talent. But most importantly – let go. Abandon yourself to the music, because only then do you begin to understand that which brings you closer to eternity.

JS: I love your photo of your cat titled Mocha’s Whiskers and I wonder who is more difficult to photograph –cats or opera singers?

PO: Ha ha. Cats, of course. How often have I said to Mocha: “Work with me now. This time try it with feeling.”

Posted in Interviews from Music, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

MEMORABLE BRAHMS IN OTTAWA WITH ZUKERMAN, BRONFMAN, DEYOUNG AND THE NATIONAL ARTS CENTRE ORCHESTRA

For a composer esteemed nowadays for the inherent weight in his large-scale compositions, Brahms certainly endured much weight upon his spirit in order to create the first of these, the Piano Concerto # 1 in D Minor. There was Robert Schumann’s published praise of the as yet untested twenty year old’s creative worth which, in turn, set daunting standards for the young Brahms to achieve. There was Beethoven’s enormous shadow looming over any compositional aspiration in the nineteenth century since, after all, what does one do after Beethoven?

There was also the relationship with Robert and with Clara Schumann whom Brahms had met in 1853 via a letter of recommendation from violinist Joseph Joachim. Brahms penned his sketches of the D Minor’s intense opening movement not long after his friend and mentor Robert had jumped into the Rhine in 1854 in order to end his life. By the 1859 premiere of the concerto in Hanover, Schumann had died in 1856 and the Brahms-Clara relationship, whatever it had been, was now profound and platonic. The Concerto itself had progressed from an abortive attempt at a symphony, for which Brahms at the time was too inexperienced in orchestration, to a sonata for two pianos, to a massive concerto with all but the now reworked first movement scrapped.

How all this relevant background specifically informs the D Minor is difficult, of course, to gauge but the outcome is a work of unsettling power, heartbreaking poetry, and surprising joie de vivre. Any performance, however, requires a soloist, a conductor, and an orchestra in top notch ranks of technical and interpretative skill and, happily and memorably, such was the case recently with the National Arts Centre Orchestra with Pinchas Zukerman conducting and his pal from student days, Yefim Bronfman, as a consummate piano soloist.

Whatever one’s inevitable preconceptions of the work –and mine are no doubt coloured by Gilels with Jochum, plus other recordings by Curzon, Gould, Fleisher, and Grimaud- here was a performance of awakening newness and secure revelations about the work that held one breathless throughout. It was inherently potent but not showy, constantly evocative but not insistent, all with a prevailing mood that resolution was not so much inevitable as imminent. It was very much a performance of the present tense, one that had to discover and pursue its musical implications, one that was not so much metaphysical as on the verge of metaphysics and, certainly, human mystery.

Right from the outset of the Maestoso movement, Zuckerman favoured fluid richness over aggressive declaration and made his impact not so much with punctuating tutti as with unfolding tonal richness, with refined emotion that also suggested an underpinning of suspense about the almost unknown. The orchestra’s organically realized forward momentum revealed the music speaking enticingly inwardly. This was an integrated musical argument to be sure, one from which all Brahmsian devices seemed to emerge naturally to fulfill its aesthetic logic.

Thus, the piano’s octave progressions, its leaps and taxing tremolos and descending trills, its distinct but sympathetic presence with the orchestra, all showed Bronfman to be unobtrusively superb in creating a natural and beautifully phrased voice as he melded one’s thinking and feeling. Elsewhere, the flutes seemed like the music’s subconscious blended into the orchestra’s textures before they drifted off into air, while the timpani, whose potential Brahms was at this point exploring, took the route of suggestion over overt declaration of their presence. As a result, we had the composer’s classical architecture inside of which there beat a complex and inherently majestic human heart.

In the lyrical and hymn-like Adagio, Bronfman’s richly precise touch and liquid emotionality created an air of blossoming tenderness. One sensed vulnerability, yes, but also confession on the verge of self-discovery of a deeply felt personal truth. This was a soliloquy of the heart resolving its emotional needs and we sensed a pianistic voice revealing matters that should not be said but must be heard. In these moments of breathtaking intimacy, the orchestral restraint –or was it poise? – created a subtle tension and gave one enough to feel but not enough to comprehend. One therefore felt suspended in profound beauty.

In the Rondo the orchestra took up the piano’s rhythmic energy as if ignited by a subtle flame into dignified exuberance. The tutti seemed to expand and diminish like a pair of lungs breathing and, if the music was gypsy-inspired, Bronfman emerged as something of a “gitan” consumed by the music’s passion. Thus, as in the other two movements, we once again heard an emotional truth so genuine that it needed no confirmation beyond itself. It was, it did not cater, it unfolded as profundities often do into our hearts, for the evening and perhaps for a very long time. And to think this was only part of the program!

In an interview with Eric Friesen prior to the concert, Pinchas Zukerman stated that Brahms wrote “songful and soulful” music “from the soul of the human being.” Regarding the evening’s vocal performance, he added that “not many have the voice for this music” but that this evening’s soloist Michelle DeYoung did. In the two songs, “Gestillte Sehnsucht” and “Geistliches Wiegenlied,” as predicted, DeYoung instantly established her emotional authority with a tonally solid but inherently warm voice that produced an easily evolving lyricism. Both songs, new to me, were accompanied by Bronfman, with Zukerman’s viola echoing the mezzo’s elongated phrases or shaping lilting counter lines, more like a second voice than accompaniment and with its own caressing lyricism. One sensed an emotionally reverent poignancy here, a discreet intensity, an unforced delicacy, and in sum a no-holds barred assertion of the heart’s riches.

Friesen introduced the Alto Rhapsody with an anecdote about author William Styron who, depressed and very close to suicide, happened to hear the third part of this moving work. In Friesen’s words, “The music breaks through, he goes up to his wife and says ‘Take me to the hospital’……So music has tremendous power, music can save lives.” In turn, mezzo Michelle DeYoung, who stated that she finds the combination of soloist and male chorus “always so comforting”, brought a despair-cleansing assurance to Goethe’s text and Brahms’ music. It was a vocal performance of evolving ripeness and intensely-longing inner logic, both integrated with Zukerman’s acutely sensitive conducting. It is certainly difficult to articulate the effect of sensed vulnerability such as in this perfomance, but Brahmsian orchestral weight seemed also, paradoxically, to hover air-like like blessing and just out of reach, though still rooted in this performance. No more be said, this was beauty at its most affecting poignancy.

The concert opened with two early Brahms choruses, melodically inspiring and beguilingly sung by a mostly female high school chorus and accompanied by two French horns and a harp. It was an inspired decision to feature this talented group, who were slated only for pre-concert performance in the lobby, because, for one, we heard the special pleasure young people can feel in singing the classical repertoire. This brief and sincere performance confirmed the value of classical music as a means to give young lives an alternative voice and a musical world to discover. Earlier Friesen had asked Bronfman how he had changed over time regarding the D Minor Concerto and the pianist had responded, “My first time I thought it was an easy piece, but I was stupid. It’s always a work in progress.” The genuine commitment of these young singers suggested that they already had learned Bronfman’s vital lesson about music-making –and about living in this world.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEWS FROM MY RECENT ARCHIVES VI

My following book reviews first appeared over the past few years in an alternative tabloid publication in Hamilton. Perhaps reading the following paragraphs will tempt you to visit your local independent bookstore and to check them out there. Here’s Part VI:

1.)Like a sacred text of any religion, the religion here being classical music, The Penguin Guide to Recorded Classical Music 2008 invites anyone, from devout believer to potential convert, to come forth and experience anew the nuanced profundity of spirit. Fortunately, the tone herein, although imbued with the writers’ erudite and fanatical dedication, is one of objective consideration that acknowledges variety in individual preferences. One may be a believer in classical music, it is further implied, but one has a responsibility to explore composers and styles as yet unheard, to compare interpretations, and above all to go forth with informed ears and hearts, thanks to the Penguin Guide, and listen and hear and listen again. I’ve been referring to the Penguin Guide since times B. C. (before compact disc) and can’t imagine doing without.

The current edition begins with Adam, of the Giselle ballet, and ends on page 1588 with one recording of Symphony 2 by Ellen Taaffe Zwilich -and there’s an issue. With the editors’ goal to provide sufficient evaluation of each named recording, you won’t, of course, find every worthy classical recording included here. Thus, even acknowledged cornerstones like Schnabel’s complete Beethoven Sonatas on EMI or Toscanini’s take on Verdi’s Falstaff, must be found in previous editions. On the other hand, this guide does include many lower-priced discs that allow one to create a substantial library without going into debt, most often thanks to the Naxos label. The writing speaks to both professional and novice –and delights as it informs Try this summation of the Takacs Quartet recording of the Bartok String Quartets: “ (They) bring to these masterpieces the requisite virtuosity, tonal sophistication and command of idiom. These are full-blooded accounts of enormous conviction, with that open-air quality which suggests the fragrance of the forests and lakes of Hungary.” Such writing not only inspires one to listen, but also to develop one’s musical knowledge -and oneself- for more sensitive and acute understanding.

2.)The Eighth Edition of The Penguin Guide to Jazz Recordings also, at 1534 pages, weighs heavy; this makes sense since it contains reviews of 14, 000 CDs. Many entries include a sometimes too succinct but helpful biography and all follow the Penguin approach of designating one to four stars with half stars allowing for finer points. One plus is that 2,000 new discs are reviewed in this edition with more than 400 new artist listings, so a noble effort is made to be up to date. As well, the writing is informed as to each recording’s stature in an artist’s career, plus the artist’s historical impact, stylistic achievements, and aesthetic clout, and many a time I read passages again for pleasure. Try this piece on June Christy: “(Her) wholesome but peculiarly sensuous voice is both creative and emotive. Her long, controlled lines and the shading of a fine vibrato suggest both a professional’s attention to detail and a tender, solicitous feel for the heart of a song, something that makes the often dark material of her later years the more affecting. Her greatest moments are as close to creating definitive interpretations as any singer can come.”

Concise, evocative, apt –that’s nice. But I am playing The Complete Lester Young Studio Sessions on Verve as I write this and, of course, feel the critical entry on the same recording is missing some, though not all, Zen possibility. And I remember Oscar Peterson explaining to me how most critics presume to know the inside track but in truth miss the boat, remember Oscar’s friend and bassist Ray Brown answering my question as to the purpose of critics with a quickly-retorted, “Critics, we’re just happy if they get the tunes right.” But, for all that, this volume is essential and I will be consulting its pages many times. (By the way, Lester Young is now singing, on a rare recorded occasion, and Margaret, walking by says, “Lester sounds like Jackie (Washington).”)

3.)Last of three Penguins, if you check out The Penguin Guide to Blues Recordings, you will have one of the true mysteries of music, Robert Johnson, on the cover staring out at you –and look at those stilt-long fingers that helped make a sound so untouchably itself. Like jazz, blues music inspires passion and invites writers to pass off personal enthusiasm for universal truths, but the ensuing dialogue –or is it conflict?- is good for the soul. And the critics in the Penguin Guides do impart much knowledge and much insightful argument to reflect upon as they blend their reasonings into judgment of compelling worth; these are real people feeling the music of which they write.

So automatically I go looking for the entry on Tommy McClennan and realize that, yes, he did “force his vocals in the manner of Charley Patton and Blind Willie Johnson” and discover that “contemporaries were impressed that such a loud voice could emanate from his diminutive frame.” In the entry of Lucille Bogan, whose sexually-explicit Shave ‘Em Dry sits proud in the raunchy hall of fame, one discovers that “She made her debut recording during Okeh’s session in Atlanta in June 1923, the first time blues was recorded on location in the South…” Yep, this volume will sit beside my CD collection.

So here’s why the Penguin Guides are so popular, chez moi and everywhere. One wants to come away with a fresh perspective on musicians one knows and informed with new information into reconsideration of their work. One wants to be seduced into checking out artists one doesn’t know or, better, challenged in one’s biases, for or against, concerning already known artists, so one won’t become aesthetically lazy. One wants to agree to disagree with writers whose integrity is, as far as possible to tell, beyond reproach and then read someone sharing their passion for music –be it classical, jazz, or blues- with addiction-inspiring enthusiasm. One wants to know more about good music, music of substance and not the clichéd mediocrities that the music industry too often imposes upon us, because we ourselves are as substantial as the depth of the sounds we allow into our ears and minds and emotions.

4.&5)The barbaric destruction of a city’s accumulated character, through indifference or wanton demolition of its buildings, dehumanizes us. We are robbed of a past we once lived in our stores and offices and theatres; we are left to despair over an ugly wasteland of parking lots, especially in our city’s core. Take a look at Gary Evans’ dozen books celebrating, in photographs, Hamilton’s years gone by and realize how people once walked our streets in intimate relation to the buildings around them. Who is it who profits that our civic spirit should die in the ruin of our city?

Christopher Rauschenberg’s Paris Changing: Revisiting Eugene Atget’s Paris (Princeton Architectural Press) shows, of course, how much of that city’s overwhelming charm ensues very often from its remaining unchanged. The 76 pairings of elegantly-reproduced photographs, taken a century apart, illustrate time almost standing still and the impact is haunting. More focused on people actually living their day-to-day lives within their architectural past are Federica D’Orazio’s Rome Then and Now and Peter & Oriel Caine’s Paris Then and Now, both from Thunder Bay Press. Once again vintage photographs are paired with a current viewing of specific locations and I’m reminded over and over why I love to visit each city. Each one is sculpted from its past.

6&7)Two new volumes from The Boston Mills Press, both by Ron Brown, are endlessly fascinating with their exclusive focus (hundreds of photographs) on our own province . Top 100 Unusual Things to See in Ontario includes the eerie Cheltenham Badlands, the fascinating Cryptic Gavestone of Rushes Cemetery, and our “last covered bridge,” located in West Montrose, all within driving distance of Hamilton. Meanwhile, Ontario’s Ghost Town Heritage features over 80 locations, including 10 near Hamilton, Crook’s Hollow near Dundas and Guelph Junction being two. I find the photographs here –now a collapsed roof, now a solitary building remaining from an entire village, now an unpainted wooden wall blackened with time- seductive, unsettling, and oozing with history.

8.)The reason for Michael Dirda’s Pulitzer Prize for literary criticism speaks on every page of his Classics for Pleasure in which he considers ninety authors/titles from world literature. These include Lao-tse, Pope, Chekhov, Gorey, Spinoza, Doyle, Beowulf, Stoker, Plutarch, Frazer, Pound, Kierkegaard, Hammett –how’s that for range? Dirda writes with an evocative clarity, an informed but unpretentious delight, and an insightful knack for revealing biographical and cultural detail, all as he admirably structures each four page chapter into something of a new world for his reader. Writing like this invigorates because it blends human smarts, literary passion, and a love for getting each sentence right. I’m delighted, each time, at how much I enjoy a dip into these pages.

9.)Some favourite recent books, that involve the deeper human dimension of creativity, include Parallels and Paradoxes, published by Vintage, a series of conversations between conductor-pianist Daniel Barenboim, a Jew, and Edward Said, a Palestinian academic. It’s subtitled Explorations in Music and Society and it certainly illuminates on many topics. We learn from Barenboim, for example, that in the operas of Wagner, a notorious anti-Semite, “there is not one Jewish character. There is not one anti-Semitic remark.” And, “By knowing your Boulez and your Carter, you see aspects of Beethoven in a different way.” One leaves these pages challenged and invigorated by the authors’ passionate voices that speak their lives, their arts, and their deep concerns for truth.

10.)Testaments Betrayed by novelist-essayist Milan Kundera, from Harper Collins, is an eloquent defense of creative individuals like Kafka, Stravinsky, Hemingway, and Rushdie, who were subjected to misguided interpretation by others and, as a result, had their artistic rights and creative integrity abused or compromised. Critical opinion is too often a case of presumption without qualifications and Kundera here convinces that the artist, not the critic or any outsider, knows best. A culture must respect its artists’ sincere intentions.

11.)Some years ago, the custodian of the Franz Schubert apartment museum in Vienna shook with emotion as she told me, “Schubert was very, very poor when he was alive.” I remembered her passionate sorrow while reading Michael Steen’s The Lives & Times of the Great Composers, published by Oxford or Icon, which shows in genuinely distressing detail the horrid conditions, both social and personal, in which many of our culture’s musical masterpieces were created. We sometimes forget in our concert hall chatter that in this music real lives are speaking.

12.)Although critical consensus deems some of the Shakespearan productions at Stratford this season misguided, check out Frank Kermode’s essential Shakepeare’s Language, published by Penguin, which provides an incisive and enlightening account of the Bard as writer. Kermode, whom I’ve found elsewhere to be unnecessarily obscure, here clearly charts Shakespeare’s dramatic development from a classically influenced style to a versatile one that poetically reflected individual psychology in memorable lines. Thus he helps us to find the human within the Bard. Kermode’s consideration of passages in Shakespeare that make no apparent sense, then and now, is especially fun.

13.)My favourite books this month include Canadian Paintings, Prints and Drawings (Firefly Books), a visually impressive, oversized volume by Anne Newlands of the National Gallery of Canada. Each of 164 artists, native included, from the 17th century up to today, gets one vivid reproduction and a text of one page in which Newlands concisely blends involved aesthetic evaluation, helpful historical and geographical context, and insightful biographical gems all to demonstrate each individual life process. I especially enjoy Newlands’ literary smarts at blending information to make each painting and its artist into an event, but I did smile at the inclusion of Harold Town’s quotation, “I paint to defy death.” Every time I visited Harold, with whom I collaborated on several books, he’d be working on several projects at one time, not defying death, I suspect, but just because his creative imagination allowed him no rest.

14&15.)In 1935, the population of Ethiopia, which I haven’t visited, was 15 million; today it is 75 million. I learned this astounding fact in The Africa Book: A Journey Through Every Country in the Continent, published by Lonely Planet. When the government of Kenya, which I have visited, recently legislated free primary education for all, one 84 year old donned school uniform shorts and, hard of hearing, sat in the front row so that he might first learn to read, then read the Bible, and then prove his preacher wasn’t following it. In other words, this oversized book, and its companion volume The Asia Book, which includes the Middle East, combine essential information about Landscape, People, History, the economy and much else in six richly illustrated pages per country and always with a human touch that brings each country to flavourful life. We are outsiders to most of the world and these two volumes help to break down many shut doors of our own ignorance –unless, of course, one is president of the USA and flaunts that ignorance.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEWS FROM MY RECENT ARCHIVES PART V

1.)My list of Notable New Books begins with an oversized The USA Book: A Journey Through America from lonely planet. This volume brings each of the fifty states to vivid life with four pages, for each one, that include half a dozen visually-intriguing photographs and concisely informative but evocative text. We learn about each state’s history, landscape, people, culture and traditions, economy, myths and legends, cuisine, representation in the arts and so much else. Tidbits include the etymology of each state’s name, its nickname, motto, and flower. As usual, lonely planet excels at pinpointing essential cultural flavours and bringing both land and its people to life.

2.)Ingrid Newkirk, president and founder of PETA, is a legendary force in our modern world, not only because she tries to reduce human cruelty to animals on a major scale, but also because she is unstoppably and comprehensively practical as in her new book The Peta Practical Guide to Animal Rights: Simple Acts of Kindness to Help Animals in Trouble (St. Martin’s Griffin). This essential guide includes endorsements from Woody Harrelson, who calls it “the ultimate animal rights encyclopedia” and Martin Sheen who calls it “a terrific book that uplifts you by showing you there are easy, sensible and clear ways to help animals,” plus a Foreword by Bill Maher, and its scope is enormous. Most chapters begin with the words “What You Can Do:” and this inspiring and practical volume belongs on the bookshelf of anyone who aspires to be forward-thinking and effectively compassionate.

3.)With richly detailed discussion of twenty-one topics such as “The conductor and the soloist,” “The central European Tradition,” “Women on the podium,” and “Conductors in rehearsal,” The Cambridge Companion to Conducting, edited by Jose Antonio Bowen, transforms the reader into an informed insider in the world of conducting and classical music. For example, a chapter titled “The orchestra speaks” provides advice for an incoming conductor that includes “Don’t skip intonation,” “Don’t conduct only the melody,” “Never be sarcastic and never lose your cool.” And did you know, for example, that Karajan “claimed to admire Toscanini for his precision and clarity, and Furtwangler for his elasticity and expression….and tried to combine these elements in his readings”? Or that Boulez “outmaneuvered the establishment by joining it?” This volume is a pleasure.

4.)Bird by Andrew Zuckerman and published by Chronicle Books is an experience that is breathtakingly surreal, boldly present, and exquisitely intimate, as it shows 75 species in 200 oversize photographs, with Zuckerman photographing each bird “against his trademark white background.” It is unnerving that the photographer takes the viewer so close into the faces and feathers of each bird that one is overwhelmed with the assured and potent sense of existence in the former and becomes lost in the infinitely delicate world of the latter. We are so close to these birds that we feel amazement at the shape and colour and internal life of each bird. Apparently, Zuckerman’s ideal shutter speed is 1/8000th of a second; as a result, he allows us to enter a new universe because we never get so close otherwise.

5.)Each photograph we take is an extension of our sensory makeup: we seek familiarity of some kind but, perhaps more essential to our development, we test what is new and explore its possibilities. At least that’s what I think while doing page by page of The Graphic Eye: Photographs by Graphic Designers From Around the Globe from Chronicle Books. As promised, the graphic designers featured here “have unique ways of looking at the world” and they certainly show both the relativity of what we see as already significant and the unique aesthetic brought to the fore by each photographer in setting up and taking a shot. Over and over, this book demands that we rethink the pictures we create and also rethink ourselves.

6&7)Both Secret Lives of the Great Artists and Secret Lives of the Great Composers (Quirk Books) by Elizabeth Lunday, who writes the ‘Masterpieces’ column for mental-floss magazine, promise “outrageous anecdotes” and the “seamy, steamy, and gritty history behind the great masters.”And, yep, we have Leonardo the ‘alleged sodomist’ and Caravaggio the ‘convicted murderer’ and Hopper the ‘alleged wife beater’ or Rossini the ‘draft-dodging womanizer’ and Wagner the ‘alleged cross-dresser.’ If the word “alleged” troubles you, you’ll still find delight here with this peppy and perky biography on the run format –six to nine pages per great artist/composer on heavy stock pages, variation in font and page design, the essence-grabbing and hilarious illustrations Mario Zucca, and Lunday’s freshly energetic prose that does indeed bring each creator to life, often with a twentieth century tone to the telling. The strange effect is that, while being informed and entertained, one gains a lively, if somewhat limited, sense of each artist or composer.

8.)“It’s a swamp adder,” cried Holmes, “the deadliest snake in India!” We then read, in The Sherlock Holmes Handbook by Rascom Riggs and published by Quirk, that “there is no such snake in India,” that snakes are deaf and so cannot respond to whistles,” and that “they are physically incapable of climbing ropes.” But, what the hell, The Speckled Band, the source of the quotation, is a gripping tale and so much else in this always entertaining, always informative Handbook redeems the sleuth of sleuths as a marvelously informed, wise and sharp fellow. One learns, for example, “How to use Analytical Reasoning,” “How to Fake Your Own Death,” “How to Deal with Friends and Relations,” and “How to Survive a Plunge Over a Waterfall.” For druggies there’s “Opium Dens and Narcotics in the Victorian Era” and for royalists there’s “How to Interact with Royalty.” In “How to Deal with Women,” Holmes says, “Women are never to be entirely trusted” and then advises “Always be a gentleman,” “Take care when attempting to deduce their motives,” ”Use their emotions to your advantage,” “Underestimate them at your own peril,” and “Beware a woman scorned.” A very useful book indeed.

9.)For those making the trek to Vancouver this winter or thereafter, lonely planet offers a hand and pocket size, visually splendid Vancouver Encounter which covers the city’s nine “neighbourhoods” under four headings each: See, Shop, Eat, Play. Other chapters include Museums & Galleries, Green Vancouver, Gay Vancouver, Accommodations, and Live Music. The many colourful maps herein are splendid in readability and the many box inserts are rich with surprising information. The prose, as one expects from lonely planet, is lived in, with it, and inspiring. Go west, my reader, go west!

10.)Pomegranate Books has just reissued The Art of Robert Bateman in a striking 25th anniversary volume that differs in several ways from the original edition published by Allen Lane. Most significant, the colours of the new version are bolder and brassier with an orange tint and yellowish backlighting that suggest sunset. The result is that detail stands out more, but there is also more repeated homogeneity of tone than in the more nuanced, tonally varied, warmer and mistier reproductions of the original edition. On the other hand, there is more revelatory colour in the expanded samplings of Bateman’s sketchbooks in the new edition. What makes having both volumes a necessity is that images are often cropped differently and differ in size between the two editions, so what one loses in omission, one gains in presence and detail. Ergo, you need both volumes of an artist sometimes maligned but always a crucial documenter, an icon maker, of our vanishing natural world. These images do inspire wonder and take one’s breath away.

11.)Dale Chihuly is certainly the most celebrated glass artist living today, renowned for his innovation and creative daring in both concept and method, and The Art of Dale Chihuly (Chronicle Books) is a dazzling celebration of the artist’s breath-seizing works. This volume, published to coincide with a major exhibition at the de Young Museum in San Francisco, covers all of Chihuly’s thematic series and includes a major illustrated essay by Timothy Anglin Burgard which considers the artist in a historical and cultural context. But it’s the photographs that demonstrate imagination at work and show why glassblowers I know speak of Chihuly with reverence as if he were a maker of magic, which indeed he is.

12.)In Self-Portrait in a Velvet Dress: Frida’s Wardrobe, Chronicle Books pays tribute to another legend, the Mexican artist Frida Kahlo, through a careful look at her famous garments which, as much as her beloved paintings, denoted a creative surge of unique individuality. Included are many photographs of Kahlo wearing the garments, shoes, jewelry and headdresses, now restored and illustrated here, in stunning display. Like the Chihuly volume, this very beautiful book pays tribute to aesthetic daring that ultimately shapes icons for the collective mind and proves that true beauty has guts to follow its own course.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEWS FROM MY RECENT ARCHIVES PART IV

BOOK REVIEWS FROM MY RECENT ARCHIVES

My following book reviews first appeared over the past few years in an alternative tabloid publication in Hamilton. Perhaps reading the following paragraphs will tempt you to visit your local independent bookstore and to check them out there. Here’s Part IV:

1.)My title-says-it-all awards this month go to Chronicle Books for What Your Poo is Telling You, by Josh Richman and Anish Sheth, which considers 27 types of poo – laugh all you want, but ignorance of what you leave behind may prove fatal. 2.)Also to Eric Groves’ Butt Rot & Bottom Gas: A Glossary of Tragically Misunderstood Words, from Quirk Books, which includes terms like maidenhead locator system, “a system used by radio operators to locate sites on earth,” and cum dividend, “a payment received by share buyers if a stock is sold.” No doubt the authors of these two wee books had much fun compiling them as you certainly will while reading the same.

3.)My favorite books this month are truly special volumes to which I expect to return many times. Dance Anecdotes: Stories from the Worlds of Ballet, Broadway, the Ballroom, and Modern Dance (Oxford University Press) covers twenty-seven themes like Towering Figures, Inspiration, Turning Points, Scandals, Dancing and the Movies, On Partnering and Partnerships, and Injuries, Maladies, Misfortunes, and Cures. Each page offers a surprising insight, a fascinating snippet of information, or a delightful piece of writing that one savors and rereads. For example, here’s Eleanor Powell on Fred Astaire: “Fred dances on the off-beat and mostly on the foot, while I am always on-beat and get most of my taps from my heel.” Alastair Macaulay’s passage on Fonteyn and Nureyev in Romeo and Juliet, and their profound effect on him, is a memorable piece of exquisite prose.

4.)After many profoundly-felt hours in cemeteries like Pere Lachaise in Paris, Highgate in London, and the Zeltralfriedhof in Vienna, and perhaps because in the last dozen years I’ve had too many dear ones return in death to the earth, I find Firefly Books’ Old Canadian Cemeteries: Places of Memory by Jane Irwin a deeply moving and treasured experience. John de Visser’s 250 photographs alone -each one evocative, aesthetically potent, unaffectedly atmospheric, and intuitively sensitive to a given subject- would make this an invaluable volume, but it’s the writing itself that subtly reaches through one’s individual and collective consciousness and deep into the soil beneath one’s feet. Irwin’s concerns are the burial places across our land that denote, in commemoration, the customs of our ancestors and serve as anchors for the “future of memory.” Irwin’s admirable approach reveals historical and cultural sensitivity, plus an uncompromising dedication to human scale and human values. Most important, she argues that our dead are within us and, that in destroying their monuments, we erase a crucial means to sustain their spirit and our humanity.

5.)David Thomson’s Have You Seen…? A Personal Introduction to 1,000 Films (Knopf) is a film-lover’s mine of information. For example, we learn –at least I didn’t know- that Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath was published in April 1939, Nunnally Johnson’s script was ready by July 13, 1939, John Ford started shooting it October 4, 1939, and the picture opened October 4, 1940. And that, for Renoir’s La Regle du Jeu, “Coco Chanel made the clothes and Henri Cartier-Bresson was an assistant.” It’s also a seductive, challenging, occasionally obscure, joyfully idiosyncratic and always delicious read. The thoroughly informed and incisively opinionated Thomson can be blunt in condemnation, as in his speculation as to how Dirk Bogarde brought himself to howl with grief in Visconti’s The Damned: “Bogarde could only get himself to cry out loud by asking the question, ‘How did I get into a piece of shit like this?’” Sometimes one agrees –“Steiger became a nearly unwatchable actor as he grew older”- or disagrees –High Noon is “not a film to see more than once”-but always, in reading Thomson, one loves film more.

6.)Spatiality is fundamental to our experience of the world and the 114 architects featured in The New Architectural Generation by Kieran Long (Laurence King Publishing) give sometimes exhilarating, sometimes unsettling, but always challenging indication of the structures we will, in the near future, live our lives within. Like each of the 800 mind-expanding photographs and drawings here that challenge one’s conceptual and aesthetic complacency, the writing does likewise, say in this passage by Tom Wiscombe: “Emergent’s approach is informed by contemporary models of biology and systems theory rather than by the arts. Ecologies and economies are evolutionary, interactive and resilient –vital qualities that are conspicuously missing from architecture, but necessary for survival in post-industrial culture.” Wiscombe attempts to move beyond the “the dead-end logic of ordering, vertical structure and façade composition” in which much of the world lives. Are we ready?

7.)Since 1968, when economics joined the ranks, there are now six categories in which Nobel Prizes are awarded annually, the rest being physics, chemistry, literature, medicine/physiology, and peace. Nobel: A Century of Prize Winners, Selected and edited by Michael Worek (Firefly) groups winners in annotated lists by decade and then by year and also provides “photographs and background information on more than 200 of the most famous and most interesting laureates,” usually a page each and sometimes more –Churchill, Martin Luther King, the Dalai Lama. It’s all fascinating as biographical information and did you know that Linus Pauling “was the only man in history to have accepted two Nobel Prizes in two different countries?” Another special pleasure is the inclusion of here a page beside Banting and Macleod explaining Insulin or another beside Tonegawa on Gene Theory and the Immune System or one beside Chandrashekar considering The Death of a Star, that for which each took a respective prize.

8.)The Art of the Movie Poster with text by Dave Hehr ( Chronicle Books) measures 13 ¼ by 11 ¼ inches, it’s 1 3/8 inches thick, and it contains 1,500 posters for films from “every corner of the globe for the last 60 years” in glorious colour. So let’s put it this way: if you are interested in film or graphic arts or differences in cultural aesthetics or creative imagination or iconography or media, be sure to warn family and friends, before you open the cover, that you’ll be gone a few days. For starters, try the five posters for Fellini’s La Dolce Vita, one from each of Italy, France, United States, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia and see where art and sensual sophistication of a culture combine. Or Gary Cooper in High Noon fulfilling various archetypal propensities in Argentine, Polish, Belgian, Italian and Czech posters. Or check out the distinctive and memorable –or is it unforgettable? -styles of Bob Peak (My Fair Lady), Peter Strausfeld (Seventh Seal), or Saul Bass (West Side Story, Exodus, Anatomy of a Murder). Or the designers playing with sexual censorship in Bhowani Junction, the Bond films with all those phallic guns, Blow Up, Magnificent Obsession and most other films. And have, with each image, a creative experience before you….after all, why did they do it that way and how did they know to do it that way? You’ll soon realize that each poster here was individually, by itself, intended, with all sorts of artistic and psychological acumen behind it, to stop you in your tracks and get your butt into the local cinema. Multiply that by 1,500 and this book gets intense.

9.)Conversations with Woody Allen: His films, the movies, and moviemaking, edited by Eric Lax and published by Alfred A. Knopf, is a book bursting with revelations from inside the creative world, process and life. Allen confirms my initial feeling that his Truffaut-like Vicky Christina “is almost more of a French movie” and, in self-effacing comparison of himself to Bergman, comments, “I’m more in control than that on a cerebral level and less in control on a competence level.” Elsewhere he notes that “whether a film is in black and white or color is of no import” and in the chapter on Directing he provides several lists of his fall-time favourite films. In Writing It, he remarks, “I think in the cracks all the time. I never stop. I don’t need peace and quiet to think…..When it comes to write, I need some space.” Also, “I always loved Eve Arden.” Me too.

10.)Cally Brackman’s One Hundred Years of Menswear (Laurence King Publishing) certainly proves that the garments we don are a costume, one that helps to create what we assume to be inner and outer reality, and that we are indeed the clothes we wear. This beautiful and intriguing volume wins on many counts, especially with hundreds of imaginatively chosen and often rare photographs and commentary that is academically informed and colloquially bubbling. While Johnny Rotten is captioned with “After punk, the power to shock through dress dissipated; never again would clothing be so disturbing,” we also encounter in 1926 “Cambridge graduates in plus fours” who also look like style-challenged idiots. My surprise is Tsuguharu Foujita, whose self portrait hangs in our dining room, in “a collarless peasant print shirt with a jacquard-knit jacket c. 1924. I especially love the Brylcreem ad from 1954 when all of us were greasy and yucky but oh so cool..

11.)I have long been annoyed by writers on wine who drop a handy and trendy vocabulary of assessment into monthly columns, as if a common language and, more fundamental, a common experience of wine existed, as we tilted a glass of Bordeaux or Burgundy and their international kin toward our eager lips. Thus, the cleverly titled Questions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine, edited by Barry C. Smith and published by Oxford, is both enjoyable and appreciated as a consideration of the experience of tasting wine. Contributors include a biochemist, a linguist, a wine critic and several philosophers who consider, in ten chapters, topics that consider “What good is knowledge (in enjoying wine)?” “Wine and the brain,” “Can wines be brawny?: Reflections on wine vocabulary,” and “Wine as an aesthetic object.” In other words, henceforth, drink but think!

12.) It was the loss of his wife, his father and his mother within six months that inspired Hamiltonian Jeff Seffinga to write his latest collection of poetry, In Times of Changing Seasons. Seffinga’s voice here is at once colloquial and noble with resolution, while his knack for achingly evocative and heart-enriching details makes the poetry resonate quietly with a profound and dignified passion. What do we do about the deaths of those love? Seffinga’s answer is a book of poetry that comes with us into the fibre of our own hearts and shows us we are not alone in grief. It’s published by Serengeti Press.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BOOK REVIEWS FROM MY RECENT ARCHIVES PART III

My following book reviews first appeared over the past few years in an alternative tabloid publication in Hamilton. Perhaps reading the following paragraphs will tempt you to visit your local independent bookstore and to check them out there. Here’s Part III:

1.)Business Cards 3: Design on Saying Hello (Laurence King Publishing) presents “over 200 innovative interpretations of the humble business card, from designers and clients around the world and across the creative industries” and it’s a good thing too. All too often one is handed a business card that makes little impression or, worse, a negative one for some reason and here, with such variety to consider, one can isolate the qualities that make an aesthetically-compelling business card, and perhaps a client, a keeper. There are many creatively exciting examples here to consider. Within the perspective of history,

2.),Made in France by Reed Darmon (Chronicle Books) is a dandy little goldmine of images from the past century of “everyday French design and pop culture ephemera.” It includes posters from travel, cinema, cafes, packaging for cigarettes (O, Gitanes and Gauloises, I remember thee well!), Pathe record labels, and much else, all given visual representation, usually with nods to Art Nouveau and Art Deco.

3.)The most visually poetic volume this month is Sites of Impact: Meteorite Craters Around the World, with eerie and stunning photographs by Stan Gaz, no doubt in part because it reminds one how vulnerable the earth and its inhabitants are to destruction. Or put it this way: “The instant an asteroid collides with Earth, the billion-year course of geological and environmental history is changed forever. Energy is transferred. Matter is displaced. Climates are irrevocably altered. Entire species of plants and animals are obliterated.” Photographer Gaz takes us to ten locations, four in Australia, three in the United States, and one in each of South Africa, Namibia, and, also, Quebec. Our Canadian crater is 1.4 million years old, 3.4 kilometers in diameter, and currently doing its duty as a lake of 270 meters in depth. Introductory essays explain structures and photographs, but the fact that “the impacting meteorite melts or vaporizes during impact” is reminder enough that in this universe of ours, humanity’s most damning and perhaps redeeming quality is our insignificance among natural forces. From Princeton Architectural Press.

4.)The 2008 Canadian Subsidy Directory promises to be “the most complete and up-to-date publication available for anyone searching for Canadian grants, loans and government programs” and it certainly delivers the goods -3208 times, in fact! Indeed, the possible sources of dollars described here from just the Canada Council for the Arts alone number over 150. The directory is available in print version for $149.95 or, as either a CD or pdf file, for $69.95. Everyone in the country from the Armenian National Committee of Canada to the Hamilton Police Pipe Band to York University to the town of Tillsonburg seems to have a copy because, as one can see, this outstanding resource is both comprehensive and easy to use and it suggests new possibilities with every scan of its contents. Businesses, non-profit organizations and individuals can find, inside, detailed contact information for each funding body along with a description of each grant, loan or program available. Order toll free by calling 1-866-322-3376 and for clarification of grants, scholarships, loans, mortgages, and venture capital, check out the website at http://www.canadianpublications.net/. Do so and you’ll save yourself hours of research and frustration.

5.)Another outstanding resource, one for those wanting to know “where & how to sell what you write,” is the immensely popular Writer’s Market, with ‘over 5 million copies sold” and published annually by Writer’s Digest Books. This 88th edition for 2009 contains over “3,500 listings for book publishers, consumer magazines, trade journals, literary agents and more” -and you’ll find this blurb is rather modest since this volume contains much, much more indeed. For examples, the editor has decided to anticipate the stuff people always ask in chapters titled “Query Letter Clinic,” Freelance Newspaper Writing 101,” “How Much Should I Charge?” and “Launching Your Freelance Business.” The amount of content in a volume of 1170 pages could easily overwhelm, but Writer’s Market is, first, designed with kindness to the reader’s eyes in mind and, second, helpfully divided into categories and sub-categories that allow easy negotiation of sections on Literary Agents, Book Publishers, Consumer Magazines, Trade Journals, and Contests & Awards. Included also are sections on Canadian Book Publishers, Small Presses, and especially useful, one called Book Publishers Subject Index to let you know who publishes specific genres like Experimental, Feminist, Science Fiction, Gay/Lesbian, and Gardening, to name a few of many.

6.)Scott Yanow has, for over thirty years, written for every key jazz magazine around, from DownBeat to Coda, and I’ve long heeded his reviews in the All Music Guide to Jazz. He is thoroughly-brewed in both his love and knowledge of jazz; he is balanced, giving but firm, and engagingly passionate in his assessments; he has a knack for placing crucial historical and biographical facts; and yes, he is a pleasure to read. In his appropriately titled The Jazz Singers: The Ultimate Guide, published by Backbeat Books, Yanow provides profiles of over 500 vocalists in the idiom from the likes of Ma Rainey, Bessie Smith and Jelly Roll Morton up to the freshly-minted breed of today that includes Diana Krall and Cassandra Wilson. You’ll find here many lesser known but worthy vocalists, recommended recordings, often websites of the singers, and chapters titled “198 Other Jazz Singers of Today,”55 Others Who Have Also Sung Jazz,” “30 Jazz Vocal Groups,” and a listing of suggested DVDs. One reason, I’ll read and re-read this Guide is for a fresh take on the singers; for example, I’ve known swing and classic jazz singer Alex Pangman for some years and still learned new stuff from Yanow’s entry on Alex.

7.)Because so many musicals set up sets locally in Toronto, Hamilton, the Stratford and Shaw Festivals, and your nearby amateur theatre, The Oxford Companion to the American Musical: Theatre, Film and Television by Thomas Hischak is certainly essential to any music-lover’s library. With the enthusiastic and well-deserved endorsements of Marvin Hamlisch, Carol Channing and Jonathan Pryce, this hefty reference weighs in at 923 densely-packed and addictive pages and scores for many reasons: it includes over 2,000 entries; it features musicals, producers, composers, lyricists, choreographers, and of course performers; it covers all three media; it is designed for visual appeal, with its informative box inserts and many evocative photos; it allows easy cross-reference. I especially appreciate the writing here –thoroughly informed, deeply involved, many an entry with a surprising and previously unknown detail that brings the subject to new and vivid life, judgments throughout that seem well-reasoned and inevitable. Be warned, however: this volume is a repeatedly delicious experience from within the world of musical theatre, as much as a comprehensive resource, and, once in, you won’t want to leave.

8.)My current favourite guide to everything is the Penguin Book of Facts, edited by David Crystal and deemed by the Independent on Sunday as “One of the greatest reference books ever published.” Did you know of The Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion?” I didn’t. Do you remember your Chemistry Table of Elements? I don’t. Can you provide the capital, currency, ethnic groups, brief history, climate, and head of state for every country on the planet? Me neither. And what can you tell me about Radioactivity Units, every Pulitzer Prize for Poetry, the development of computers, Saints’ Days, the perpetual calendar from 1821 to 2020, the grape varieties of every region of France, the length of pregnancy in various mammals, the major works of Shostakovich?…..and et cetera ad infinitum. This too: as a flexible and sturdy paperback, the Penguin Book of Facts is comfortable to use too!

9.)The best reeference (sorry, I could not pass without…) book of the month, is The Official High Times Pot Smoker’s Handbook (Chronicle Books), by David Bienenstock and the editors of High Times Magazine. It promises to be “the definitive guide to pot culture” and, if you are high or not, it will no doubt take you higher. Chapters cover How to Smoke-proof your dorm room, the best pot scenes in movies, Holy Smokes: Was Jesus a Stoner?, 30 Years of High Times’ Best Buds, and –start at #1 folks- 420 things to do when you’re stoned. This one will keep you rolling in the aisles or anywhere else, for that matter, and, once you weed out your friends, this will make a nice token gift (Okay, no more).

10.)Back in the early nineties, I found myself in the south of England chatting with Jon Wynne-Tyson about his play on the relationship between Jon’s mother Esme and Noel Coward, a script which eventually was heard on the BBC. Letters between Stoj and Poj, as they called each other, are included in The Letters of Noel Coward (Knopf), a 780 page goldmine from the playwright’s private world of correspondence which embraces as well Virginia Woolf, Greta Garbo, Ian Fleming, Marlene Dietrich, FDR, GBS, T. E. Lawrence and everyone else in the Who’s Who of his era. This indispensible collection reveals much of the man and certainly confirms Sir Noel’s “talent to amuse” -and his talent to surprise as in his remark, “Did I mention that Mexico City is a cunt?”

Because I adore Coward’s plays quite often as theatrical perfection, I especially enjoy this collection’s behind the scenes documentation such as Coward musing: “I wonder why it is that my plays are such traps for directors….Nobody seems capable of leaving well enough alone and allowing the words to take care of themselves.” The account of Coward’s song “Don’t Let’s Be Beastly to the Germans,” which FDR loved and which Coward was obliged by Churchill to sing until he was hoarse, is hilarious, especially because the offended folks at the BBC missed completely the irony of the song. Some quibbles: editor Barry Day’s flip analogy of the Spanish Civil War as “an out-of-town tryout for what was to come” is glib and shallow, to be sure. But Coward, for me always suggests a complex and intense fellow, behind the seemingly easy theatrical genius on stage, and this volume helps to reveal why.

11.)With over 2,000 entries and 506 pages, Researching the Song (Oxford University Press), by Shirlee Emmons and Wilbur Watkins Lewis, is intended to guide performers, teachers and enthusiasts through “most of the mythological, historical, geographical and literary references contained in western art song.” If your familiarity touches only the works of, say, Schubert, you’ll find that many of the entries here enrishing. Did you know that Igor Stravinsky wrote “In Memoriam Dylan Thomas?” That Walt Whitman’s poetry has been set to music by at least fifteen composers who include Ned Rorem and Charles Ives, but also Vaughan Williams and Hindemith? That Schonberg set Nietzsche to music? That Shostakovich did likewise with Robbie Burns? Entries include Wilhelm Muller, whose poems were set to music not only famously by Schubert but also by Fanny Mendelssohn, Mother Goose, Sodom, and “blows his nail,” an expression used in Elizabethan lyrics. This endlessly informative volume is a constantly delightful read and an essential cornerstone for any classical music library.

12.)The most visually stunning book this month is Image and Imagination Georgia O’Keefe (Chronicle) by John Loengard, the Life photographer whose 39 haunting photographs of the 80 year old O’Keefe are here juxtaposed to stunning effect with the elderly artist’s iconic paintings. This memorable volume is visually breathtaking and evokes inner feeling akin to serenity.

13.)Fascinating as a thorough look at the many dozens of careers and occupations in the ancient world, Vicki Leon’s cleverly titled Working IX to V (Walker & Company) covers dozens of ways, some quite bizarre, that people of antiquity made a buck. Leon’s perky, entertaining and inherently enthusiastic style brings the working folk of ancient Greece and Rome to vivid life and you’ll be surprised to read about occupations such as Orgy Planner, Sycophant, Funeral Clown, Stercorarius (Manure Entrepreneur), Pirate, Vestal Virgin, and Armpit Plucker.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment